Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Advertising Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham.
Browse: Home » 2014 » August

THE RISK OF INDEMNITY COSTS: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TELL YOUR CLIENT?

August 31, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting

The idea of costs budgeting was, in part at least, to give the parties some certainty as to the costs they would have to face it they lost an action.   However the decision in  Kellie & Kellie -v- Wheatley &…

COSTS BUDGETING: CONDUCT, INDEMNITY COSTS AND PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT: KELLIE -v- WHEATLEY CONSIDERED

August 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting

We looked at the decision in Kellie & Kellie -v- Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd[2014] EWHC 2866(TCC) yesterday in the context of drafting witness statements.  The judgment is equally interesting on the issue of costs and costs budgeting. There is an…

A WORKING EXAMPLE OF THE DANGERS OF NOT TAKING A FULL WITNESS STATEMENT: DISASTER CAN STRIKE

August 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements

The decision of Judge Keyser Q.C. In Kellie & Kellie -v- Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd [2014] EWHC 2866(TCC)  gives a working example of the dangers of not taking a full witness statement and exploring issues of importance with a…

PROTOCOL FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF EXPERTS: THE NEW BITS

August 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Expert evidence

There has been much coverage of the forthcoming changes to the guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims.  There have been several additions which impose specific duties upon solicitors.  SOLICITOR MUST MAKE POSITION CLEAR IF FURTHER DOCUMENTS ARE…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FROM DOWN UNDER

August 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Useful links, Witness statements

Recent posts have given rise to a international tour searching out guidance for the preparation and drafting of witness statements. We have been to Scotland, and to the East, and now we arrive in Australia where the Western Australian Bar…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND COMPLYING WITH THE RULES: WHY WITNESS STATEMENTS CAN COME TO GRIEF

August 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The case of Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd (in administration) v. UBS AG [2014] EWHC 2450 (Comm) contains yet another example of the very real dangers of using a witness statement to argue a case.  It is usually unhelpful and often…

WITNESS STATEMENTS; WITNESSES; EVIDENCE AND PSYCHOLOGY: GUIDANCE FROM THE EAST

August 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements

The post yesterday looked at guidance on taking witness statements from Scottish Judges. Here we look at a real gem of an article by Ula Cartwright-Finch and Alex Waksman of Herbert Smith Freehills on the accuracy of witness statements and…

ANOTHER RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS CASE – ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE MP: RELIEF GRANTED AFTER FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF FUNDING

August 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Relief from sanctions

Relief from sanctions was granted to the claimant in Ye0 MP -v- Times Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 2853 (QB). THE ACTION This was a defamation action where the claimant had failed to file notice of funding with the Particulars of…

THE PROCESS OF TAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FROM ACROSS THE BORDER

August 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

There is relatively little guidance to litigators on the process of taking witness statements. What are appropriate questions and, to what extent, can the witness be “guided” by the lawyer.  These are difficult and sensitive topics which have been considered…

CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS – HERE’S THE CATCH: THE JUDGE CAN ACCEPT SOME OF THE EVIDENCE SOME OF THE TIME

August 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements

There have been several posts on this blog in relation to witness evidence and witness credibility.  One important point to note is that a judge is entitled to find that a witness is correct on some matters and not on…

APPEALS: STAY OF EXECUTION AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY APPELLATE COURT: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES

August 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure

The fact that an appeal is made, or permission to appeal is granted, does not automatically grant a stay of execution.  The appellant has to apply for a stay and the court can grant conditions.  The law and principles governing…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX & CHANCERY CHAMBER: LEEDS -v- COMMISSIONERS CONSIDERED

August 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Relief from sanctions

One of the places where Mitchell, and subsequently Denton, had a major impact was the specialist tribunals. As we have seen in this blog Mitchell principles were applied with some vigour and the “clarification” by Denton has also had an effect….

A 20 DAY TRIAL WHEN THE CASE WAS ALL ABOUT ONE WITNESS: WOULD THIS CASE BE ANY DIFFERENT TODAY?

August 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Expert evidence, Mediation & ADR, Witness statements

Back in 2003 Chris Evans, the radio presenter, was involved in a lengthy contractual dispute with a number of defendants.  There were 9 parties to the action and the trial went on for twenty days. The judge’s observations at the…

PART 36 OFFERS AND NON-MONETARY CLAIMS: A HIGH COURT CASE CONSIDERED

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Part 36, Risks of litigation

We have looked before at the advantages to a claimant in making an early Part offer. If the claimant matches or beats that offer at trial then there are advantages in costs and interests. There can also be a 10%…

MORE ABOUT TRIAL BUNDLES: MOST OF THE STUFF IN THEM IS USELESS (APPARENTLY)

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Written advocacy

The decision discussed earlier today of Dowdall -v- William Kenyon & Sons Ltd [2014] EWHC 2822 (QB) contained an interesting observation that I wanted to deal with separately. It concerns the “usefulness” of trial bundles. OBSERVATIONS ON THE BUNDLES The Claimant has…

SECOND ACTION AFTER SETTLEMENT NOT AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: SECTION 33 APPLICATION ALLOWED: DOWDALL CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Second set of proceedings

The case of Dowdall -v- William Kenyon & Sons Ltd [2014] EWHC 2822 (QB) decided yesterday contains some important observations in relation to allegations of abuse of process; estoppel and section 33. THE FACTS Mr Dowdall has pleural mesotheliomia. In 2003…

FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF AMENDED CFA DETAILS IS NOT A SERIOUS OR SIGNIFICANT BREACH: HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Relief from sanctions

The High Court decision in Ultimate Products Ltd -v- Wooley [2014] EWHC 2706 (Ch) provides further guidance as to what the courts are likely to consider “serious or significant” breaches. The High Court judge upheld the decision of the Master…

CIVIL EVIDENCE: WITNESS STATEMENTS: PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF AN ORAL CONTRACT

August 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

I have written before about witness evidence and the difficulties in establishing matters without the benefit of corroboration.  The case of Brogden & Reid -v- Investec Bank Ltd [2014] EWHC 2785 (Comm) reported today illustrates this problem. THE ISSUES: WAS THERE AN…

THE MITCHELL CASE RUMBLES ON: MORE PROCEDURAL ISSUES: SPLIT TRIAL ORDERED

August 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure

I feel almost duty bound to continue to report on the Mitchell case, even if now has limited relevance to the question of sanctions. The latest case management decision offers an interesting decision on whether there should be a split…

DENTON CONSIDERED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: ELDER -v- REVENUE & CUSTOMS

August 3, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Relief from sanctions

The Denton case was considered by the First Tier Chamber: Tax Tribunal in Elder -v- Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 728 (TC). Consideration of the Denton principles led to relief being granted.  The decision is, obviously, specific to the rules relating to…

1 2 Next →

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2021. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22,745 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DON’T SETTLE AFTER A MEDIATION: NO ISSUE BASED ORDER, INDEMNITY COSTS AND £127,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS
  • KERRY UNDERWOOD ON COSTS – AND SO MUCH MORE: SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE READ ALL ABOUT IT
  • SEEKING SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THERE ARE QUITE STRINGENT RULES: CLAIMANT HAD TO RECTIFY SITUATION TO OBTAIN ORDER
  • WHY CAN’T YOU ASK LEADING QUESTIONS IN COURT (AND WHY SHOULDN’T YOU DO IT WHEN PREPARING A WITNESS STATEMENT)
  • NEW FORM N244: SOMETHING TO WATCH OUT FOR

Top Posts & Pages

  • NEW FORM N244: SOMETHING TO WATCH OUT FOR
  • SEEKING SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THERE ARE QUITE STRINGENT RULES: CLAIMANT HAD TO RECTIFY SITUATION TO OBTAIN ORDER
  • WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DON'T SETTLE AFTER A MEDIATION: NO ISSUE BASED ORDER, INDEMNITY COSTS AND £127,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS
  • KERRY UNDERWOOD ON COSTS - AND SO MUCH MORE: SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE READ ALL ABOUT IT
  • WHY CAN'T YOU ASK LEADING QUESTIONS IN COURT (AND WHY SHOULDN'T YOU DO IT WHEN PREPARING A WITNESS STATEMENT)

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 14th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Hardwicke
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • www.Bailii.org

Archives

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies.
To find out more, as well as how to remove or block these, see here: Our Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2021 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by WordPress and Origin