Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Advertising Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Zenith Chambers, Leeds, & Hardwicke, London
Browse: Home » Serving documents
DENTON APPLIED WHEN THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT SHOW UP FOR TRIAL

DENTON APPLIED WHEN THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT SHOW UP FOR TRIAL

January 22, 2018 · by gexall · in Applications, Relief from sanctions

In Foreman v Williams [2017] EWHC 3370 (QB) Peter Marquand (sitting as a High Court judge) considered the application of the Denton principles in an unusual context.  The claimant required relief from sanctions because he was unable to serve documents on…

ANOTHER MONTH, ANOTHER DECISION ON NON-SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE RESULT OF A "NEGLIGENT OR INCOMPETENT ERROR"

ANOTHER MONTH, ANOTHER DECISION ON NON-SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE RESULT OF A “NEGLIGENT OR INCOMPETENT ERROR”

September 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Higgins & Ors v ERC Accountants & Business Advisers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2190 (Ch) His Honour Judge Pelling  (sitting as a High Court judge) considered a number of issues relating to service of the claim form. It is another example…

PROVING SERVICE BY FAX: OPERATOR OF A FAX MACHINE IS A "RESPONSIBLE PERSON"

PROVING SERVICE BY FAX: OPERATOR OF A FAX MACHINE IS A “RESPONSIBLE PERSON”

March 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Serving documents

In  a judgment today in  LBI EHF -v- RAIFFEISEN ZENTRALBANK ÖSTERREICH AG [2017] EWHC 522 (Comm) Mr Justice Knowles CBE had to consider whether the fact that a party could not find a fax meant that it had not been served. This involved…

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2019. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Legal Futures Civil Litigation Conference, 2019

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 15,258 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WHEN EXPERTS REPORT THINGS THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN SAID: IT NEVER GOES WELL (WHEN THEY ARE FOUND OUT AT LEAST)
  • KEEP YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS SHORT AND TO THE POINT: A SHOT ACROSS THE LITIGANTS’ BOWS
  • CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 32: BEWARE YE, BEWARE YE, BEWARE YE THE HUMBLE WITNESS SUMMARY: IT COULD BITE BACK – WITH VENGEANCE
  • COURT REFUSED TO ORDER THAT CONTESTED EVIDENCE BE REMOVED FROM EXPERT REPORTS
  • EXAGGERATION IS NOT NECESSARILY FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: WHEN THE DEFENDANT DIGS A BIG EVIDENTIAL HOLE FOR ITSELF

Top Posts & Pages

  • EXAGGERATION IS NOT NECESSARILY FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: WHEN THE DEFENDANT DIGS A BIG EVIDENTIAL HOLE FOR ITSELF
  • KEEP YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS SHORT AND TO THE POINT: A SHOT ACROSS THE LITIGANTS' BOWS
  • CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 32: BEWARE YE, BEWARE YE, BEWARE YE THE HUMBLE WITNESS SUMMARY: IT COULD BITE BACK - WITH VENGEANCE
  • WHEN EXPERTS REPORT THINGS THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN SAID: IT NEVER GOES WELL (WHEN THEY ARE FOUND OUT AT LEAST)
  • COURT REFUSED TO ORDER THAT CONTESTED EVIDENCE BE REMOVED FROM EXPERT REPORTS

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death
  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 3rd edition

Useful Links

  • Hardwicke
  • Justice- Standard Order for Directions
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • www.Bailii.org
  • Zenith Chambers
  • Zenith Personal Injury Blog

Archives

Copyright © 2019 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by WordPress and Origin