PART 36: A NEAR MISS IS NOT ENOUGH

  A  recent case emphasises that a “near miss”  with a Part 36 offer is not relevant to the court’s assessment of costs after a trial.   There was, for a time, a developing jurisprudence around “near miss” offers and Part 36. In Carver –v- BAA Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412 http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/ma...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below