WHAT WOULD THE SUPREME COURT THINK ABOUT MATTERS RELATING TO PROCEDURE? CLUES FROM THE PRIVY COUNCIL?

March 15, 2014 · by · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Striking out

The Mitchell case was not appealed.  Practitioners have no clue as to the approach of the Supreme Court to matters of procedure. However a decision of the Privy Council on the 3rd March makes interesting reading as to potential construction of the Civil Procedure Rules. Real Time Systems –v- Renraw ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below

Tags: , ,