CIVIL CASE OF THE YEAR: AA -v- LBS: DAVID -v- GOLIATH?

December 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

There were only a few comments when I asked, on twitter, for recommendations for the civil case of the year. I have overlooked the obvious candidate (Denton)and gone for a case that can, and should, reinvigorate belief in the civil justice system. The decision of HH Judge Anthony Thornton QC in AA ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below

Tags: Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Witness statement

4 Responses

Tim · December 29, 2014 at 22:10:43 · →

But how many people have resigned in the light of the judgment?
NL · January 26, 2015 at 12:33:28 · →

None. Or at least none have been publicly mentioned.
Tim · January 26, 2015 at 19:08:44 · →

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/aa_v_london_borough_of_southwark
Tim · January 27, 2015 at 01:32:05 · →

Item 6 on the agenda:

http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/g4960/Public%20reports%20pack%20Tuesday%2025-Nov-2014%2019.00%20Housing%20Community%20Safety%20Scrutiny%20Sub-Committee.pdf?T=10

Comments are closed.

← THE NEW PART 36 PART 2: OTHER EFFECTS OF ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER

THE NEW PART 36: PART 3: UNACCEPTED OFFERS AND INCREASED RESTRICTIONS ON DISCLOSURE OF OFFERS →