MUDSLINGING IN WITNESS STATEMENTS CAN BACKFIRE: BUNDLES OF IRRELEVANT DOCUMENTS COUPLED WITH IRRELEVANT AND INADMISSIBLE WITNESS STATEMENTS: A FAMILIAR TALE?

The case of Mohidin -v- The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 2740 (QB) will, no doubt, be looked at in detail for its implications for claims against the police.  The case also contains interesting observations about similar fact evidence and the weight to be given to witnesses ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below