DEFENDANT IN CASE WITH PROTECTED PARTY ENTITLED TO RESILE FROM “COMPROMISE”: REQUIREMENT FOR COURT APPROVAL NOT A BREACH OF ECHR RIGHTS

In Revill v Damiani [2017] EWHC 2630 (QB) Mr Justice Dingemans  held that the rule that required a protected party to obtain a court order to approve a proposed settlement remained good law. It did not breach the claimant's human rights.

  THE CASE The claimant was badly injured in a road traf...