PROVING THINGS 113: POOR EVIDENCE COLLECTION: EXPERTS STRAYING WELL BEYOND THEIR REMIT AND WHO ARE “NOT ENTITLED TO REACH THAT CONCLUSION”

 Family cases, however, often come up with interesting observations in relation to the judge's role as a fact finder. Similarly much can be gained by looking at  the judge's observations on experts. We see a critique of the process of evidence collection and criticism of three  experts in Kent Count...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below