DEALING WITH PROCRASTINATION: A POST I HAVE FINALLY GOT AROUND TO…
Every litigator, indeed every living being, has problems with procrastination. In civil litigation this can lead to major problems and is, if truth be known, responsible for a large number of procedural issues. Here we look at practical solutions to deal with a problem that virtually every litigator has. A failure to realise this, to face up to it, and to have strategies in place to deal with these issues underlies a surprising number of cases relating to limitation, service and procedural default.
PROCRASTINATION AND “FISH FILES” ARE AN INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM
The problem of delay and “avoidance” of tasks that need doing is not unique to the United Kingdom. Many of the links below come from the USA where the problem of the “fish file” is universally recognised. A “fish file” is a file that has been left for so long it has started to smell. Fish files feature several times in John Grisham’s work. He even wrote a short story about a lawyer’s issues with fish files.
THE CONSEQUENCE OF NOT DEALING WITH FISH FILES
This is actually a very serious problem. Procrastination can lead to depression which, in turn can lead to other problems.
The crucial thing is to realise that this is a universal problem. Every lawyer has one of these files (I often ask at lectures and, over the years, only one person has said they did not [his colleagues later cast much doubt on this]). Further there is plenty of material out there (a lot of it American) which can usefully be adapted. Here I have some links to useful on-line guides.
USEFUL LINKS: DEALING WITH PROCRASTINATION
- The on-line site “Lawyers with Depression” takes this issue very seriously and provides practical guidance in Depression and Procrastination
- The Law Society of British Columbia has a 10 point plan to overcome procrastionation
- Spencer Consulting offer tips on time management in Overcoming Procrastination: How to get things done despite yourself
- Law Practice Management deals with the issue, the advice includes Eat the Frog
- Hilary Rettig offers explanations as to why lawyers are often prone to procrastination
- Attorney at Work has 5 steps to beat back procrastination
- The ABA has guidance on how dealing with procrastination can help lawyers avoid disciplinary problems
- Lawyers.Com has guidance on these issues in procrastination is not a plus
- Think like a Lawyer has a guide: How to stop procrastinating
- The Lawyer Coach Blog has a tip: How to stop procrastionation in your practice
- The (non) billable hour has an explanation as to Why lawyers procrastinate
- Some really interesting discussions in the ABA Journal (on litigation) Fix the problem if you are always behind in your work
- Legal Productivity has a Procrastination Flowchart for attorneys
- The Daily Record has Five tips for lawyers to avoid procrastination
- The ABA Journal advises that Procrastination Can be Managed
LITIGATION SPECIFIC
Some of the above are general.
- Solo Practice Journal has the Case of the procrastinating PI Attorney
- The California Litigation Attorney Blog has a piece on The Perils of Procrastination – Misunderstanding a Statute of Limitations
IT CAN AFFECT YOUR HEALTH
- The on-line site “Lawyers with Depression” takes this issue very seriously and provides practical guidance in Depression and Procrastination
- Lawyers concerned for Lawyers discusses pattern of depression and avoidance hurting practice
PRACTICAL ADVICE
Gibson & Perkins Attorneys offer regular malpractice avoidance tips. In “Managing your Fish Files” they recommend a regular swapping of fish files to ensure that problems are shared and dealt with.
HUMOUR: TO SURVIVE WE HAVE TO LAUGH
- Legal Cheek offers advice on how do to it: Procrastination: a Jaded Solicitor’s Guide
- Above the Law has 7 Ways to Kill Time While working at a law firm
- Followed by 7 more Ways to Kill Time While working at a law firm
- Wait but Why on Why Procrastinators Procrastinate
AREN’T WE A LONG WAY AWAY FROM CIVIL PROCEDURE?
No. We are bang on the money in relation to the cause of so many cases being subject to sanctions. It is not lack of knowledge or ability that causes many procedural problems but a failure to get to grips with the issues in the case, or a failure to deal with the case itself because it (or a specific issue in the case) has become a “fish file”.
WHAT IS TO BE DONE?
Every litigator is working under much more stress in the post-Mitchell world. Many of the reported cases on sanctions are clearly due to procrastination. This has to be recognised as an issue and dealt with. There is no point denying that these problems exist. There are methods of addressing these issues. If these problems are not dealt with and recognised then time limits will be missed and sanctions will inevitably follow. This is not a subject that can be put to one side to be dealt with later.
GUIDANCE FROM YOUR PEERS
In 2014 I held a seminar on avoiding procedural problems. The participants in that programme came up with a number of practical steps.
THE LIST: THE COMBINED EFFORT OF ALL THE TEAMS
1. If you are stuck ask for help. Get a second opinion.
2. The firm should carry out regular file reviews.
3. Delegate the work if necessary (but don’t “dump” it on junior colleagues”).
4. If you are avoiding a file, make an appointment with yourself specifically to do that task.
5. Segment the work into pieces.
6. Have an office “swop-shop” where files can be exchanged if necessary.
7. Ensure that there is an open culture in the office where problem files can be discussed.
8. Make an appointment with the client (it was felt that this could encourage action and also give rise to encouragement and inspiration).
9. Go to counsel [I should explain that a number of my colleagues were also taking part, I accept their vested interest].
10. Deal with matters when you are at your best.
11. Ensure that everyone has a manageable case load.
OTHER ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS
. Also take a look at The Daily Record: tips for lawyers to avoid procrastination.
1. Recognising you have a problem is a major part of the battle.
2. “Fashion a starting point”. Start on a simple administrative task on the file and work from there.
3. Create a sense of urgency – or delegate the file.
4. Break the work down into segments.
5. Reward yourself when the work is done.