THE DANGERS OF A LAWYER GIVING EVIDENCE: A “SOMEWHAT STRANGLED VERSION” OF THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION & BELIEF: SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION DISMISSED BECAUSE OF PAUCITY OF FIRST-HAND EVIDENCE

There are numerous posts on the blog about the need for first-hand evidence to be given, and the dangers of a lawyer making witness statements.  These risks are exemplified in the judgment of Chief Master Marsh today in The David Roberts Art Foundation Ltd v Riedweg [2019] EWHC 1358 (Ch) (06 June 20...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below