LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS SUMMARIES: HERE’S AN INGENIOUS ARGUMENT – THAT DIDN’T WORK: PERMISSION TO ADDUCE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE FROM PARTIES OWN WITNESS ALSO REFUSED

In Smith & Anor v Crawshay [2019] EWHC 2507 (Ch)  HHJ Paul Matthews considered an argument that the defendant was allowed to rely on a witness summary.  He also refused permission to adduce further evidence in evidence-in-chief from a witness and had some strong views on the late (or non) disclo...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below