2 Responses
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 12.4K other subscribers
Recent Posts
- SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH – AND BY THE WAY – AS IT TURNS OUT – THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
- WHAT TO DO IF THE DEFENDANT MAKES AN EARLY PART 36 OFFER: WEBINAR 29th APRIL 2026
- COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 4: WHY IS PD57AC BREACHED SO OFTEN? “SOLICITORS MIGHT FEEL UNDER PRESSURE TO SIGN CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE … EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW THAT STATEMENTS WERE NOT COMPLIANT…”
- COST BITES 379: HIGH COURT JUDGE UPHOLDS DECISION THAT INTERIM BILLS WERE STATUTE BILLS AND THAT THE CLAIMANT COULD NOT SEEK ASSESSMENT OUT OF TIME
- OPENING LINES TO START THE WEEK: “FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNISED THAT HUMAN HEARING CAN BE DAMAGED BY EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE”
Top Posts
- SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH - AND BY THE WAY - AS IT TURNS OUT - THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
- OPENING LINES TO START THE WEEK: "FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNISED THAT HUMAN HEARING CAN BE DAMAGED BY EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE"
- BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN YOU ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE THE COURT HAS TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WILL ALL COST...
- COST BITES 379: HIGH COURT JUDGE UPHOLDS DECISION THAT INTERIM BILLS WERE STATUTE BILLS AND THAT THE CLAIMANT COULD NOT SEEK ASSESSMENT OUT OF TIME
- COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 4: WHY IS PD57AC BREACHED SO OFTEN? "SOLICITORS MIGHT FEEL UNDER PRESSURE TO SIGN CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE ... EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW THAT STATEMENTS WERE NOT COMPLIANT..."
Archives
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
The wording on the N1 hasn’t changed but you can use the form to incorporate the Particulars of Claim. To amend with a sticker or not to amend with a sticker. That is the question …..
The approved wording certainly seems not to get round the original mischief.
However, could you get the desired effect by inserting something like Paragraph 1 “It has been explained to me that contempt proceedings could be brought against me if I have made, or caused to be made, a false statement within this document.”?