In The 52 Occupiers of the Ceramic Works v Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 17 (TCC) District Judge Baldwin considered an application to substitute a defendant after the primary limitation period had expired. The judge, if anything, was critical of the defendant's stance. The claim...
Once again, and incredibly frustratingly, there is no mention of what costs order was made. This is of crucial importance to all practitioners so WHY IS IT ALWAYS OMITTED FROM THE REPORTS???