CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPEAL ON POSSESSION ISSUES STAYED BY PD51Z: NO SALAMI SLICING OF CASES WHERE A LANDLORD IS SEEKING POSSESSION
In the judgment in TFS Stores Ltd v The Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) General Partner Ltd & Ors[2020] EWCA Civ 833 the Court of Appeal (by a majority) stayed a number of appeals, holding that they were possession proceedings…
Civil Procedure (Coronavirus): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUNDUP – JUNE 2020
This round up looks at the impact that COVID-19 is having on the law, and procedure in particular. The key cases in relation to the impact of coronavirus were considered in the post on the Kings Chambers’ blog Coronavirus: How…
JUDGMENT SET ASIDE WHEN DEFAULT WAS OBTAINED BECAUSE OF “LOCKDOWN”: LITIGATORS MUST BE AWARE THAT THE WORLD SHIFTED ON ITS AXIS ON 23 MARCH 2020
The judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in Stanley v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2020] EWHC 1622 (QB) is the first reference I have seen to that part of CPR PD51ZA that deals the court’s general discretion when faced…
GOING BACK INTO COURT: MY FIRST EXPERIENCE OF A SOCIALLY DISTANCED TRIAL
Yesterday I had my first experience since “lockdown” of going back into a court building to do a trial. I did a series of tweets about it and they have had some attention. That is why i thought it best…
CORONAVIRUS LAW: SHOULD A HEARING BE IN PERSON OR BY VIDEO?
In Surrey Heath Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2020] EWHC 1650 (QB) Mr Justice Freedman considered submissions that a hearing should take place in person. He held that there was an onus on part requesting a hearing in court…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE TRIAL HELD REMOTELY: AND IT WORKED WELL…
I have highlighted some cases where remote hearings have had difficulties. In Jones v Ministry of Defence [2020] EWHC 1603 (QB) the judgment indicates that the remote hearing in a clinical negligence case worked well. THE CASE The case was…
THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 31: THE MUSICAL SECTION: NIKOLAS CLARKE – THE CONDUCTOR’S TALE
Having had 30 lawyers write about their experiences in lockdown it is now time to vary the membership. Indeed the club constitution requires us to lighten the mood and provide cheer to the profession. So I have decided to expand…
THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB: OUR THIRTY FOUNDING MEMBERS: WHERE WILL THE CLUB GO FROM HERE?
We now have thirty founding members of The (not so) Lonely Litigator’s Club. I started the club in the hope that it would give some people some support during lockdown by seeing how other lawyers are coping whilst working at…
WHEN REMOTE HEARINGS GO WRONG: AND STRUGGLING THROUGH TO PUT THEM RIGHT – AT WHOSE COSTS?
I often listen to, and read, official statements about remote hearings with a degree of scepticism. The impression is given that things are going smoothly. The reality is that things are often going awry and it is taking a great…
THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 30: OUR FINAL FOUNDING MEMBER MICHAEL WILLIAMSON: ” THAT ADMIRABLE SOLICITOR FROM CREWKERNE”
This is the last post in this series in its current format. The thirty club members to date are our “founding members”. I started this series so lawyers could share their experiences of working through lockdown. Michael has dealt with…
THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 29: STEPHEN LOXTON: THE CLERK’S TALE
Next on our list of members is Stephen Loxton, Director of Clerking at Kings Chambers. Steve is working from home with two young children for company. He is one of hundreds (if not thousands)of people involved in the management of…
THE (NOT SO) LONELY LITIGATOR’S CLUB 28: DAVID WITHERS
There may, at times, be a slight Yorkshire bias to the selection of club members, be assured that this is not unconscious. However I noticed that South Yorkshire was missing. Today we here from David Withers a partner at Irwin…
The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) (Coronavirus) Rules 2020: EXTENDING STAY ON POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS UNTIL THE 23rd AUGUST 2020EEDINGS TO THE 23
These Regulations come into force on the 25th June 2020. The put the stay on possession proceedings into the rules (they have previously been in a Practice Direction). The rules are available here . THE NEW RULES Citation and commencement…
CORONAVIRUS LAW: POSSESSION APPEAL HEARD IN STAY PERIOD: JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GIVEN UNTIL END OF THE STAY
The judgment of Mr Justice Cavanagh yesterday in Bromford Housing Association Ltd v Nightingale & Anor [2020] EWHC 1532 (QB) is another variant of the issues relating to the stay of possession proceedings. In this case the judge declined to…
CORONAVIRUS LAW: APPLICATION TO ADJOURN HEARING REFUSED: JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED
The decision of Mr Justice MacDonald today in Lancashire County Council v M & Ors (COVID-19 Adjournment Application) [2020] EWFC 43 is another case where an application to adjourn because of Covid concerns was refused. The judge held that an…
BACK TO COURT: USEFUL ADVICE AND LINKS FOR KEEPING SAFE WHILST OUT AND ABOUT IN A PANDEMIC
The courts are, gradually, re-opening. Civil and criminal hearings are taking place. We have to trust that steps are being taken to protect our health. I asked on Twitter for advice that people had in relation to getting to, and…
CORONAVIRUS LAW: COVID IS NOT GOING TO BE USED AS A REASON TO ALLOW A LATE AMENDMENT TO A DEFENCE
In the judgment today in Pearce v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust [2020] EWHC 1504 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert considered an argument that the Coronavirus epidemic could play a part in the defendant’s application to amend its defence. …
TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: REMOTE COURT HEARINGS GUIDANCE NOTE
The Transparency Project have produced a Remote Court Hearings Guidance Note. This is aimed at litigants themselves. Although it is quite specifically aimed at the Family Courts many litigants (and some lawyers) may find this of some assistance. THE…
CORONAVIRUS LAW IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: A HYBRID HEARING WILL NOT BE UNFAIR IF LEADING COUNSEL CANNOT ATTEND IN PERSON
In the judgment today in C (Children : Covid-19: Representation) [2020] EWCA Civ 734 the Court of Appeal dismissed an argument that a “hybrid” hearing, to be heard with one side’s leading counsel attending remotely, was unfair. THE CASE…
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE QUEEN’S BENCH MASTERS FROM 15th JUNE 2020: (EVEN THOUGH YOU’RE NOT GOING TO EQUITY YOU WILL HAVE CLEAN HANDS…)
A further bulletin has been issued which sets out the procedure for hearings before Queen’s Bench Masters from the 15th June. The default position is that hearings will be heard remotely. If an “in person” hearing is needed then it…