HAVE YOU COMPLIED WITH AN "UNLESS ORDER"? GUIDANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF E-DISCLOSURE

A hearing on the question of whether a party has complied with an unless order is always a fraught one. The stakes are high, particularly for the party alleged to be in breach.  Here we look at compliance in relation…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND COSTS BUDGETING: THE JUDGMENT IN MITCHELL -v- NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS IN FULL

The full transcript of the decision of Master McCloud    in Andrew Mitchell MP –v- Express Group Newspapers [2013] EWHC 2355 (QB) is now available. The case was discussed, in outline in an earlier post,  http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/08/11/litigatorswant-to-work-for-nothing-then-dont-file-your-costs-budget-on-time/  but that was on the…

SANCTIONS AND DEFAULT: THE NEW APPROACH IN PRACTICE. THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF BAKER -v- HALLAM ESTATES

The post yesterday looked at the duties owed by an applicant making a without notice application. The full transcript of the case is now available and contains some salutary observations.   Baker –v- Hallam Estates Baker -v- Hallam Estates [2013]…

DOES THE CIVIL LITIGANT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS? CPR 3.9, ARTICLE 6 AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

This post looks at the case law relating to Article 6 and the right to a fair trial in civil proceedings. It looks at whether decisions under the new CPR 3.9 need to consider the issue of “proportional response”.  …

SERVICE OF A COPY CLAIM FORM IS NOT GOOD SERVICE: HOW COULD THIS BENEFIT A CLAIMANT?

This post looks at the unusual case of  Hills Construction –v- Struth [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC) which considered issues relating to service of the claim form and extensions of time for service of the Particulars of Claim.   The facts…

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CPR: CAN BITE DEFENDANTS TOO!

This post looks at the decision in Dass –v- Dass where the defendant was refused permission to rely upon medical experts because they had not been served in accordance with court directions.  Many of the recent cases in relation to…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE KEY DATE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW CPR 3.9

This post deals with misunderstandings that appear to be in place as to which cases the new CPR 3.9 provisions on relief from sanctions apply to. In particular whether the key date is the date of issue of proceedings or…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE WHERE RELIEF WAS REFUSED

This post discusses a recent case where the Court refused relief from sanctions.   In Thavattheva Theveraraja and Southern Territory Ltd –v- Riordan, Burke and Prestige Property Developer UK Ltd (Ch D 09/08/2013) Hildyard J refused relief from sanctions when…

LITIGATORS:WANT TO WORK FOR NOTHING? THEN DON'T FILE YOUR COSTS BUDGET ON TIME

This post deals with the extremely draconian penalty imposed on a litigant who fails to file a costs budget on time. THE RULES CPR 3.13 and 14 deals with the duty to exchange costs budgeting.     Filing and exchanging…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE IN WHICH RELIEF WAS GRANTED. WYCHE -v- CAREFORCE GROUP LTD

Every case in relation to relief from sanctions is being examined carefully after 1st April. The case of IAN ALAN WYCHE v CAREFORCE GROUP PLC (2013)QBD (Comm) 25/07/2013  is going to be of interest. The case is not yet fully reported…