<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-15.9'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/02/cost-bites-407-court-of-appeal-overturns-decision-striking-out-points-of-dispute-because-of-non-ainsworth-compliance-judgment-given-today/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-02T12:45:22Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 407: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS DECISION STRIKING OUT POINTS OF DISPUTE BECAUSE OF NON-AINSWORTH COMPLIANCE: JUDGMENT GIVEN TODAY</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-02T13:00:10Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/02/the-current-importance-of-pleadings-85-there-is-no-free-pass-when-an-action-is-brought-on-behalf-of-multiple-claimants-there-is-a-definite-sense-of-the-claimants-thrashing-about-trying-to-fin/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-02T10:37:30Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 85: THERE IS NO &amp;quot;FREE PASS&amp;quot; WHEN AN ACTION IS BROUGHT ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE CLAIMANTS: &amp;quot;THERE IS A DEFINITE SENSE OF THE CLAIMANTS THRASHING ABOUT, TRYING TO FIND ANY ISSUES WHICH COULD BE TRIED WHICH AVOIDED ANY INVESTIGATION OF ANY FACTS.&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-02T10:45:32Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/02/five-thousand-claimants-and-just-eight-court-fees-court-of-appeal-upholds-decision-on-cpr-7-3/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-02T09:33:28Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>FIVE THOUSAND CLAIMANTS AND JUST EIGHT COURT FEES:  COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION ON CPR 7.3</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-02T10:00:51Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/02/the-court-was-wrong-not-to-strike-the-defence-out-a-failure-to-dispute-a-point-in-the-jersey-courts-meant-it-was-not-open-to-a-defendant-to-argue-it-again/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-01T16:25:01Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THE COURT WAS WRONG NOT TO STRIKE THE DEFENCE OUT: A FAILURE TO DISPUTE A POINT IN THE JERSEY COURTS MEANT IT WAS NOT OPEN TO A DEFENDANT TO ARGUE IT IN A SECOND ACTION</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-02T07:00:31Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/02/advocacy-the-judges-view-looking-at-series-2-and-why-this-applies-to-all-litigators-including-that-regular-missive-that-you-should-not-threaten-your-opponent-with-a-proctology-examination/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-01T15:52:54Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ADVOCACY - THE JUDGE&amp;#039;S VIEW: LOOKING AT SERIES 2: AND WHY THIS APPLIES TO ALL LITIGATORS... (INCLUDING THAT REGULAR MISSIVE THAT YOU SHOULD NOT THREATEN YOUR OPPONENT WITH A PROCTOLOGY EXAMINATION..)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-02T06:00:55Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/01/artificial-intelligence-and-litigation-an-update-on-consultation-findings-from-the-civil-justice-council/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-01T07:43:44Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-01T11:00:39Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/01/witness-evidence-wednesday-2-a-checklist-for-those-called-up-to-prepare-witness-statements-in-a-farepak-type-scenario/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T22:13:30Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY 2: A CHECKLIST FOR THOSE CALLED UP TO PREPARE WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A &amp;quot;FAREPAK&amp;quot; TYPE SCENARIO</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-01T08:00:26Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/01/witness-evidence-wednesday-the-case-where-the-governments-witness-evidence-was-so-bad-that-it-withdrew-the-case-before-the-respondents-gave-evidence-why-the-principles-relating-to-witness-evidence/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T22:09:58Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE CASE WHERE THE GOVERNMENT&amp;#039;S WITNESS EVIDENCE WAS SO BAD THAT IT WITHDREW THE CASE BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS GAVE EVIDENCE: WHY THE PRINCIPLES RELATING TO WITNESS EVIDENCE NEED TO BE UNDERSTOOD</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-01T07:00:12Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/01/where-things-go-wrong-in-litigation-and-stopping-it-happening-to-you-3-advising-a-client-that-if-they-discontinue-then-they-cant-come-back/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T15:08:59Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WHERE THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU 3): ADVISING A CLIENT THAT IF THEY DISCONTINUE THEN THEY CAN&amp;#039;T COME BACK</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-01T06:00:34Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/30/where-things-went-wrong-in-litigation-and-stopping-it-happening-to-you-2-advising-a-client-that-they-are-not-liable-for-costs-because-proceedings-have-not-been-served/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T10:46:48Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-30T12:00:17Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/30/damages-in-anticipation-of-death-and-losses-prior-to-death-2026-webinar-2nd-july-2026/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T10:47:38Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>DAMAGES IN ANTICIPATION OF DEATH AND LOSSES PRIOR TO DEATH 2026: WEBINAR 2nd JULY 2026</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-30T11:00:11Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/30/where-things-went-wrong-in-litigation-and-stopping-it-happening-to-you-1-costs-advice-on-discontinuance/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-30T10:00:44Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 1: COSTS ADVICE ON DISCONTINUANCE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-30T10:00:06Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/30/the-online-procedure-rules-and-practice-directions-rules-2026-come-into-force-here-is-a-summary-and-the-rules-themslves/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-29T14:40:48Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-30T07:00:46Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/30/expert-watch-53-that-clinical-negligence-case-again-the-defendants-experts-made-mistakes-and-then-gave-an-impression-of-loftiness-the-judge-felt-unable-to-rely-on-their-conclusions/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-29T14:03:02Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>EXPERT WATCH 53 (THAT CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE AGAIN): THE DEFENDANT&amp;#039;S EXPERTS MADE MISTAKES AND THEN &amp;quot;GAVE AN IMPRESSION OF LOFTINESS&amp;quot; : THE JUDGE FELT UNABLE TO RELY ON THEIR CONCLUSIONS</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-30T06:00:10Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
