<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-15.7.1'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/commercial-litigators-on-the-naughty-step-3-why-pd57ac-was-introduced-the-proper-and-sensible-scope-of-evidence-in-chief-is-no-longer-the-stock-in-trade-knowledge-of-those-responsible-for-proofing/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-24T13:24:32Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: &amp;quot;THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES...&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T14:00:21Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/proving-things-288-how-should-a-court-consider-a-claim-for-loss-of-earnings-when-the-claimant-is-still-in-employed-smith-v-manchester-approach-prevails/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-24T15:23:57Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>PROVING THINGS 288: HOW SHOULD A COURT CONSIDER A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS STILL IN EMPLOYMENT? SMITH -v- MANCHESTER APPROACH PREVAILS</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T13:00:39Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/claims-for-loss-of-earnings-avoiding-the-pitfalls-webinar-19th-june-2026-together-with-a-useful-questionnaire-and-series-of-checklists/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-24T10:19:54Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T12:00:06Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/the-weaponisation-of-applications-to-commit-in-civil-proceedings-its-not-clever-its-not-tough-and-it-certainly-is-not-a-marketing-tool/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-24T09:36:57Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THE &amp;quot;WEAPONISATION&amp;quot; OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT&amp;#039;S NOT CLEVER, IT&amp;#039;S NOT &amp;quot;TOUGH&amp;quot; AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T10:00:47Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/cost-bites-378-reform-of-the-solicitors-act-1974-part-iii-read-the-consulation-paper-a-chance-to-comment-on-the-provisions-that-are-a-great-mystery-to-many-solicitors-not-my-words/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-24T08:52:28Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 378  : REFORM OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974, PART III: READ THE CONSULATION PAPER: A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE &amp;quot;A GREAT MYSTERY&amp;quot; TO MANY SOLICITORS (NOT MY WORDS...)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T08:52:28Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/throwback-friday-schedules-and-counter-schedules-are-not-a-number-crunching-exercise-april-2018/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-04-23T15:56:21Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THROWBACK FRIDAY: SCHEDULES AND COUNTER-SCHEDULES ARE NOT A &amp;quot;NUMBER CRUNCHING EXERCISE&amp;quot; (APRIL 2018)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-04-24T06:00:58Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
