https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/08/an-introduction-to-the-coroners-court-for-personal-injury-and-clinical-negligence-lawyers-2026-webinar-17th-july-2026/ 2026-07-02T14:15:18Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CORONER'S COURT FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS 2026: WEBINAR 17th JULY 2026 2026-07-08T14:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/08/expert-watch-57-judge-decides-that-an-expert-that-has-not-complied-with-their-duties-to-the-court-should-be-named-he-had-a-choice-to-involve-himself-in-these-proceedings-and-to-be-paid-for-doing/ 2026-07-08T09:48:39Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 57: JUDGE DECIDES THAT AN EXPERT, THAT HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THEIR DUTIES TO THE COURT, SHOULD BE NAMED; "HE HAD A CHOICE TO INVOLVE HIMSELF IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AND TO BE PAID FOR DOING SO..." 2026-07-08T12:00:49Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/08/53284/ 2026-07-06T16:36:23Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PERSONAL INJURY MATTERS 17(2): LIABILITY CATCHUP (2): A SUCCESSFUL STRESS AT WORK CLAIM CONSIDERED 2026-07-08T11:00:22Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/08/a-judge-should-not-have-prevented-a-defendant-tenant-speaking-at-a-possession-hearing-just-because-they-had-not-filed-a-defence-the-civil-procedure-rules-have-primacy-over-a-peremptory-order/ 2026-07-06T15:35:38Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en A JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE PREVENTED A DEFENDANT TENANT SPEAKING AT A POSSESSION HEARING JUST BECAUSE THEY HAD NOT FILED A DEFENCE: THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES HAVE PRIMACY OVER A PEREMPTORY ORDER 2026-07-08T07:00:35Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/08/witness-evidence-wednesday-when-a-litigator-makes-a-statement-on-behalf-of-their-client-a-useful-checklist-on-the-source-of-information-and-belief/ 2026-07-05T19:31:58Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN A LITIGATOR MAKES A STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENT: A USEFUL CHECKLIST ON THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF 2026-07-08T06:00:21Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/07/expert-watch-56-a-section-of-a-judgment-that-specifically-criticises-a-medical-expert-i-was-struck-by-the-absence-of-a-rigorous-and-careful-multidiscplinary-approach-to-this-issues-in-this-case/ 2026-07-07T14:47:02Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 56: A SECTION OF A JUDGMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY CRITICISES A MEDICAL EXPERT: "I WAS STRUCK BY THE ABSENCE OF A RIGOROUS AND CAREFUL MULTIDISCPLINARY APPROACH TO THIS ISSUES IN THIS CASE" 2026-07-07T13:00:49Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/07/expert-watch-55-was-this-war-or-caused-by-war-trial-judge-considers-the-evidence-of-two-experts-on-geopolitics-but-finds-one-is-partisan/ 2026-07-07T14:57:16Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 55: WAS THIS WAR? (OR CAUSED BY WAR): TRIAL JUDGE CONSIDERS THE EVIDENCE OF TWO EXPERTS ON GEOPOLITICS, BUT FINDS ONE IS PARTISAN 2026-07-07T12:00:53Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/07/personal-injury-matters-17-1-liability-catchup-1-pub-operator-is-not-vicariously-liable-for-doormens-acts-a-conclusion-reached-with-regret/ 2026-07-05T22:07:30Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PERSONAL INJURY MATTERS 17 (1): LIABILITY CATCHUP (1): PUB OPERATOR IS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR DOORMEN'S ACTS: A CONCLUSION REACHED "WITH REGRET" 2026-07-07T11:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/07/cost-bites-411-how-does-a-court-determine-the-amount-of-an-interim-payment-as-to-costs-when-the-case-has-not-been-budgeted-should-a-payment-be-ordered-at-all/ 2026-07-06T21:59:15Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 411: HOW DOES A COURT DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF AN INTERIM PAYMENT AS TO COSTS WHEN THE CASE HAS NOT BEEN BUDGETED? SHOULD A PAYMENT BE ORDERED AT ALL? 2026-07-07T07:00:08Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/07/cost-bites-410-a-claimants-compliance-with-the-rules-relating-to-issue-and-pleading-cannot-be-used-as-a-grounds-for-reducing-its-recoverable-costs/ 2026-07-06T16:40:53Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 410: A CLAIMANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES RELATING TO ISSUE AND PLEADING CANNOT BE USED AS A GROUNDS FOR REDUCING ITS RECOVERABLE COSTS 2026-07-07T06:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/06/where-things-go-wrong-in-litigation-and-stopping-it-happening-to-you-4-not-serving-properly-obtaining-default-judgement-incorrectly-and-suing-a-party-wrongly-a-lot-of-lessons-here/ 2026-07-05T20:37:07Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en WHERE THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 4: NOT-SERVING PROPERLY; OBTAINING DEFAULT JUDGEMENT INCORRECTLY AND SUING A PARTY WRONGLY: A LOT OF LESSONS HERE 2026-07-06T10:00:53Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/06/service-points-48-a-default-judgment-in-the-first-action-against-a-defendant-who-was-never-served-leads-to-a-second-action-being-struck-out/ 2026-07-05T20:51:43Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SERVICE POINTS 48 : A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THE FIRST ACTION (AGAINST A DEFENDANT WHO WAS NEVER SERVED) LEADS TO A SECOND ACTION BEING STRUCK OUT 2026-07-06T07:00:16Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/06/back-to-basics-monday-2-a-series-of-checklists-to-help-you-with-drafting-statements-for-corporate-clients-the-source-of-information-and-belief/ 2026-07-05T18:55:57Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en BACK TO BASICS MONDAY (2): A SERIES OF CHECKLISTS TO HELP YOU WITH DRAFTING STATEMENTS FOR "CORPORATE" CLIENTS: THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF 2026-07-06T06:00:58Z Blog