<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-16.1.1'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/24/cost-bites-440-why-indemnity-costs-were-ordered-a-look-at-the-claimants-pleaded-case-firstly-it-was-pleaded-too-widely-secondly-there-were-then-attempts-to-put-the-case-outside-the-pleadings/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-23T20:54:39Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 440: WHY INDEMNITY COSTS WERE ORDERED A LOOK AT THE CLAIMANTS&amp;#039; PLEADED CASE: FIRSTLY IT WAS PLEADED TOO WIDELY, SECONDLY THERE WERE THEN ATTEMPTS TO PUT THE CASE OUTSIDE THE PLEADINGS</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-24T13:00:15Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/24/civil-litigation-brief-webinars-coming-up-later-this-year-a-new-discount-code/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-18T15:19:23Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF WEBINARS COMING UP LATER THIS YEAR: A NEW DISCOUNT CODE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-24T09:00:20Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/24/cost-bites-438-is-the-existence-of-a-costs-budget-a-reason-not-to-award-indemnity-costs/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-23T19:48:46Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 439 : IS THE EXISTENCE OF A COSTS BUDGET A REASON NOT TO AWARD INDEMNITY COSTS ?</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-24T08:00:41Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/24/back-to-basics-monday-relief-from-sanctions-the-relevance-of-the-clients-being-solely-at-fault-some-difficult-issues-to-tackle/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-23T19:07:29Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE RELEVANCE OF THE CLIENTS BEING SOLELY AT FAULT: SOME DIFFICULT ISSUES TO TACKLE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-24T06:00:54Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/24/cost-bites-438-claimants-untenable-arguments-leads-to-reduction-in-costs-recovered-hourly-rates-far-too-high-even-when-the-claim-was-only-for-9-million/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-19T13:21:22Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 438  : CLAIMANT&amp;#039;S UNTENABLE ARGUMENTS LEADS TO REDUCTION IN COSTS RECOVERED: HOURLY RATES FAR TOO HIGH, EVEN WHEN THE CLAIM WAS &amp;quot;ONLY&amp;quot; FOR £9 MILLION</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-24T06:00:21Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
