https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/remote-participation-in-court-hearings-the-judicial-principles-explained/ 2026-06-09T13:12:16Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en REMOTE PARTICIPATION IN COURT HEARINGS: THE JUDICIAL PRINCIPLES EXPLAINED 2026-06-09T13:30:38Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/updated-guidance-on-completing-case-administration-tasks-in-myhmcts/ 2026-06-09T09:14:51Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en UPDATED GUIDANCE ON COMPLETING CASE ADMINISTRATION TASKS IN MyHMCTS 2026-06-09T12:00:58Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/preparing-a-schedule-and-providing-evidence-in-a-fatal-claim-webinar-12th-june-2026/ 2026-06-08T22:09:21Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PREPARING A SCHEDULE AND PROVIDING EVIDENCE IN A FATAL CLAIM: WEBINAR 12th JUNE 2026 2026-06-09T11:00:39Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/should-proceedings-be-struck-out-when-the-claimants-had-issued-in-the-wrong-court-using-the-wrong-method-the-denton-principles-considered/ 2026-06-09T09:18:29Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SHOULD PROCEEDINGS BE STRUCK OUT WHEN THE CLAIMANTS HAD ISSUED IN THE WRONG COURT, USING THE WRONG METHOD? THE DENTON PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED 2026-06-09T09:00:24Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/expert-watch-50-the-expert-should-have-given-his-true-opinions-earlier-not-waited-until-cross-examination/ 2026-06-08T21:55:10Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 50: THE EXPERT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN HIS TRUE OPINIONS EARLIER - NOT WAITED UNTIL CROSS-EXAMINATION 2026-06-09T07:00:40Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/09/fundamental-dishonesty-established-at-trial-it-was-not-a-substantial-injustice-to-dismiss-the-claim/ 2026-06-08T21:57:19Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY ESTABLISHED AT TRIAL: IT WAS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE TO DISMISS THE CLAIM 2026-06-09T06:00:56Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/08/expert-watch-49-expert-evidence-is-unusual-at-an-interlocutory-hearing-this-mixture-of-of-submissions-and-opinion-was-not-cpr-35-compliant-expert-evidence/ 2026-06-05T13:15:50Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 49: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS "UNUSUAL" AT AN INTERLOCUTORY HEARING: "THIS MIXTURE OF OF SUBMISSIONS AND OPINION WAS NOT CPR 35 COMPLIANT EXPERT EVIDENCE" 2026-06-08T09:00:50Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/08/the-judge-was-entitled-to-believe-the-claimant-and-find-that-he-was-not-fundamentally-dishonest-defendants-appeal-hits-a-barrier/ 2026-06-07T21:01:42Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE JUDGE WAS ENTITLED TO BELIEVE THE CLAIMANT AND FIND THAT HE WAS NOT FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: DEFENDANT'S APPEAL HITS A BARRIER 2026-06-08T07:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/08/cost-bites-399-when-the-costs-of-the-litigation-almost-entirely-consume-the-value-of-the-estate-being-sued/ 2026-06-07T21:48:14Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 399: WHEN THE COSTS OF THE LITIGATION ALMOST ENTIRELY CONSUME THE VALUE OF THE ESTATE BEING SUED: 2026-06-08T07:00:03Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/08/back-to-basics-monday-the-duty-to-serve-a-notice-of-appeal-as-soon-as-is-practicable/ 2026-06-05T16:05:28Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: THE DUTY TO SERVE A NOTICE OF APPEAL "AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE" 2026-06-08T06:00:50Z Blog