<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-16.0.1'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/29/two-procedural-points-to-watch-giving-remote-evidence-from-abroad-seeking-costs-before-the-first-tier-tribunal/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-29T10:53:30Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>TWO PROCEDURAL POINTS TO WATCH: GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE FROM ABROAD: SEEKING COSTS BEFORE THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-29T11:00:35Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/29/cost-bites-420-indemnity-costs-awarded-you-should-have-applied-to-strike-us-out-or-you-could-have-made-a-lower-offer-are-not-an-attractive-arguments-in-this-context/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-28T22:43:10Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 420 : INDEMNITY COSTS AWARDED: &amp;quot;YOU SHOULD HAVE APPLIED TO STRIKE US OUT&amp;quot; OR &amp;quot;YOU COULD HAVE MADE A LOWER OFFER&amp;quot; ARE NOT AN ATTRACTIVE ARGUMENTS IN THIS CONTEXT</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-29T08:00:54Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/29/another-breach-of-judgment-embargo-case-why-solicitors-must-badger-their-clients-about-compliance-the-court-embargo-is-fundamentally-different-from-journalist-embargo/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-28T22:01:22Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ANOTHER BREACH OF JUDGMENT EMBARGO CASE: WHY SOLICITORS MUST BADGER THEIR CLIENTS ABOUT COMPLIANCE: &amp;quot;THE COURT EMBARGO IS FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FROM JOURNALIST EMBARGO&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-29T07:00:06Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/29/witness-evidence-wednesday/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-28T21:29:55Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: LARGE PARTS OF THE CLAIMANT&amp;#039;S WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE STRUCK OUT: &amp;quot;INADMISSIBLE AS A MATTER OF LAW&amp;quot; &amp;quot;OF MARGINAL RELEVANCE&amp;quot; AND DEAL WITH &amp;quot;WHOLLY COLLATERAL ISSUES&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-29T06:00:51Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/28/mazur-matters-the-legal-services-board-final-report-on-mazur-regulatory-review-of-advice-and-guidance-provided-to-the-profession-on-the-conduct-of-litigaiton-by-approved-regulators-and-regulatory/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-28T11:25:44Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>MAZUR MATTERS 66: THE LEGAL SERVICES BOARD FINAL REPORT ON MAZUR: &amp;quot;REGULATORY REVIEW OF ADVICE AND GUIDANCE PROVIDED TO THE PROFESSION ON THE CONDUCT OF LITIGAITON BY APPROVED REGULATORS AND REGULATORY BODIES&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-28T11:30:16Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/28/cost-bites-419-how-claiming-counsels-fees-on-an-n260-can-lead-to-referral-to-the-attorney-general-for-contempt-of-court-proceedings-to-be-considered-signatory-beware/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-28T10:11:25Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 419: HOW CLAIMING COUNSEL&amp;#039;S FEES ON AN N260 CAN LEAD TO REFERRAL TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS TO BE CONSIDERED: SIGNATORY BEWARE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-28T10:00:56Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/28/seeking-a-stay-pending-an-appeal-generalised-assertions-are-no-substitute-for-evidence/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-27T22:02:41Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>SEEKING A STAY PENDING AN APPEAL: &amp;quot;GENERALISED ASSERTIONS ARE NO SUBSTITUTE FOR EVIDENCE&amp;quot;: COURT REFUSES APPLICATION</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-28T07:00:14Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/28/service-points-50-is-service-of-a-tenant-and-an-address-stated-in-the-lease-good-service-when-the-tenant-is-not-there-does-the-contract-override-the-cpr/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-27T21:31:33Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>SERVICE POINTS 50: IS SERVICE OF A TENANT AND AN ADDRESS STATED IN THE LEASE GOOD SERVICE WHEN THE TENANT IS NOT THERE?  DOES THE CONTRACT OVERRIDE THE CPR?</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-28T06:00:15Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/27/general-damages-for-psychiatric-injury-the-key-issues-considered-webinar-30th-july-2026/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-26T22:15:03Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>GENERAL DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY - THE KEY ISSUES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 30th JULY 2026</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-27T12:00:48Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/27/cost-bites-418-the-parties-should-share-the-costs-of-an-electronic-platform-initially-this-multi-claimant-case-is-most-definitely-suitable-for-costs-budgeting/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-26T18:50:01Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 418:  THE PARTIES SHOULD SHARE THE COSTS OF AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM (INITIALLY): THIS MULTI-CLAIMANT CASE IS MOST DEFINITELY SUITABLE FOR COSTS BUDGETING</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-27T11:00:19Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/27/an-application-to-strike-out-for-abuse-or-process-adjourned-to-see-whether-this-need-happen-on-a-rolling-basis-one-thousand-claimants-started-but-are-unlikely-to-finish/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-26T18:24:02Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT FOR ABUSE OR PROCESS ADJOURNED - TO SEE WHETHER THIS NEED HAPPEN ON A &amp;quot;ROLLING BASIS&amp;quot;: ONE THOUSAND CLAIMANTS STARTED BUT ARE UNLIKELY TO FINISH...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-27T08:00:33Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/27/the-practices-i-have-identified-must-stop-the-court-lays-down-a-clear-warning-in-relation-to-inadequate-time-estimates/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-27T07:19:40Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>&amp;quot;THE PRACTICES I HAVE IDENTIFIED MUST STOP&amp;quot;: THE COURT LAYS DOWN A CLEAR WARNING IN RELATION TO INADEQUATE TIME ESTIMATES</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-27T07:00:59Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/27/back-to-basics-monday-when-a-doctor-provides-a-note-to-the-report-about-the-capacity-of-a-witness/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-07-27T06:41:06Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>BACK TO BASICS MONDAY:  WHEN A DOCTOR PROVIDES A NOTE ABOUT THE CAPACITY OF A WITNESS: WHAT THE COURT REQUIRES</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-07-27T06:00:44Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
