https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/28/practice-direction-changes-introduced-yesterday-new-provisions-in-the-damages-claim-portal-other-remedy-claims-can-now-be-made/ 2026-05-28T12:13:50Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PRACTICE DIRECTION CHANGES INTRODUCED YESTERDAY: NEW PROVISIONS IN THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: "OTHER REMEDY" CLAIMS CAN NOW BE MADE 2026-05-28T12:30:45Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/28/personal-injury-points-15-the-students-loan-company-may-be-an-emanation-of-the-state-some-interesting-issues-here-these-are-issues-of-law-not-one-on-which-a-witness-can-express-an-opinion-or/ 2026-05-27T16:11:06Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 15: THE STUDENTS LOAN COMPANY MAY BE AN "EMANATION OF THE STATE": SOME INTERESTING ISSUES HERE: THESE ARE ISSUES OF LAW - NOT ONE ON WHICH A WITNESS CAN EXPRESS AN OPINION OR VIEW... 2026-05-28T08:00:46Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/28/personal-injury-points-14-claimant-fails-in-slipping-case-there-was-a-hypothetical-risk-of-slipping-which-the-defendant-did-not-need-to-deal-with/ 2026-05-27T16:21:56Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 14: CLAIMANT FAILS IN SLIPPING CASE: THERE WAS A "HYPOTHETICAL" RISK OF SLIPPING WHICH THE DEFENDANT DID NOT NEED TO DEAL WITH 2026-05-28T07:00:10Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/28/personal-injury-points-13-where-there-is-blame-there-is-not-always-a-claim-the-defendant-breached-their-duty-but-the-claimants-action-failed/ 2026-05-27T16:19:06Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 13: WHERE THERE IS BLAME THERE IS NOT ALWAYS A CLAIM: THE DEFENDANT BREACHED THEIR DUTY BUT THE CLAIMANT'S ACTION FAILED 2026-05-28T06:00:30Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/27/the-current-importance-of-pleadings-77-case-struck-out-there-was-insufficient-pleadings-of-fact-from-which-it-could-be-inferred-that-any-of-the-allegations-have-a-real-prospet-of-success/ 2026-05-26T21:58:42Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 77: CASE STRUCK OUT: THERE WAS "INSUFFICIENT PLEADINGS OF FACT FROM WHICH IT COULD BE INFERRED THAT ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE A REAL PROSPET OF SUCCESS" 2026-05-27T09:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/27/service-points-44-local-authority-fails-to-serve-properly-on-interested-parties-to-proposed-appeal-the-whole-appeal-fails/ 2026-05-26T19:48:11Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SERVICE POINTS 44: LOCAL AUTHORITY FAILS TO SERVE PROPERLY ON INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROPOSED APPEAL: THE WHOLE APPEAL FAILS 2026-05-27T07:00:20Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/27/witness-evidence-wednesday-tips-for-testifying-in-court-from-the-united-states-attorneys-office-middle-district-of-pennsylvania/ 2026-05-26T21:18:40Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: TIPS FOR TESTIFYING IN COURT: FROM THE UNITED STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA) 2026-05-27T06:00:36Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/26/service-points-43-why-cpr-6-15-is-not-the-cavalry-coming-over-the-hill-to-save-you-if-the-claim-form-has-not-been-served-properly/ 2026-05-26T14:56:48Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SERVICE POINTS 43: WHY CPR 6.15 IS NOT THE "CAVALRY" COMING OVER THE HILL TO SAVE YOU IF THE CLAIM FORM HAS NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY 2026-05-26T15:00:44Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/26/service-points-42-a-82-million-pound-fails-because-the-claim-form-was-sent-by-email-to-solicitors-who-had-not-stated-that-they-would-accept-service-an-old-issue-and-a-big-one/ 2026-05-26T14:50:18Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SERVICE POINTS 42: A £82 MILLION POUND FAILS BECAUSE THE CLAIM FORM WAS SENT BY EMAIL TO SOLICITORS WHO HAD NOT STATED THAT THEY WOULD ACCEPT SERVICE: AN OLD ISSUE (AND A BIG ONE) 2026-05-26T13:30:18Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/26/cost-bites-391-too-much-correspondence-grade-c-rates-not-increased-and-so-called-arguments-which-repeat-the-contents-of-over-lengthy-witness-statements/ 2026-05-26T10:20:19Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 391: TOO MUCH CORRESPONDENCE, GRADE C RATES NOT INCREASED AND "SO CALLED" SKELETON ARGUMENTS, WHICH REPEAT THE CONTENTS OF OVER-LENGTHY WITNESS STATEMENTS 2026-05-26T10:01:46Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/26/avoiding-the-pitfalls-bundles-witnesses-and-preparing-for-trial-webinar-on-29th-may-2026-it-may-be-a-whole-bundle-of-fun/ 2026-05-25T16:17:00Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: BUNDLES, WITNESSES AND PREPARING FOR TRIAL: WEBINAR ON 29th MAY 2026: IT MAY BE A WHOLE BUNDLE OF FUN 2026-05-26T07:00:23Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/05/26/cost-bites-391-court-of-appeal-upholds-decision-that-solicitors-bill-should-be-assessed-at-nil-there-is-no-restitutionary-right-to-damages-where-the-cfa-itself-made-express-provisions-for/ 2026-05-25T14:29:35Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 391: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION THAT SOLICITOR'S BILL SHOULD BE ASSESSED AT "NIL": THERE IS NO "RESTITUTIONARY" RIGHT TO DAMAGES WHERE THE CFA ITSELF MADE EXPRESS PROVISIONS FOR THESE CIRCUMSTANCES 2026-05-26T06:00:40Z Blog