https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/26/cost-bites-406-can-a-party-recover-unnecessary-costs-as-damages-the-consequences-of-an-unnecessary-second-action-considered-in-the-high-court/ 2026-06-26T11:05:28Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 406: CAN A PARTY RECOVER UNNECESSARY COSTS AS DAMAGES? THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNNECESSARY SECOND ACTION CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT 2026-06-26T11:00:54Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/26/the-webinar-on-the-sra-guidance-on-effective-supervision-what-litigation-firms-need-to-know-together-with-lots-of-checklists-and-templatesnow-available-on-demand/ 2026-06-25T20:49:49Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE WEBINAR ON THE SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION: WHAT LITIGATION FIRMS NEED TO KNOW: TOGETHER WITH LOTS OF CHECKLISTS AND TEMPLATESNOW AVAILABLE "ON DEMAND" 2026-06-26T09:00:22Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/26/cost-bites-405-should-a-successful-claimants-conduct-lead-to-a-deduction-of-45-of-their-costs-a-tooth-decision/ 2026-06-26T06:43:50Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 405: SHOULD A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT'S CONDUCT LEAD TO A DEDUCTION OF 45% OF THEIR COSTS? A TOOTH DECISION... 2026-06-26T08:00:16Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/26/should-the-court-allow-a-newly-appointed-employee-to-represent-a-limited-company-at-a-hearing/ 2026-06-25T20:00:13Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW A "NEWLY APPOINTED" EMPLOYEE TO REPRESENT A LIMITED COMPANY AT A HEARING? 2026-06-26T07:00:56Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/26/throwback-friday-thirteen-years-of-blogging-june-2013-the-teenage-years-are-starting/ 2026-06-25T16:18:55Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THROWBACK FRIDAY: THIRTEEN YEARS OF BLOGGING (JUNE 2013): THE TEENAGE YEARS ARE STARTING... 2026-06-26T06:00:24Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/25/asking-the-judge-questions-after-judgment-is-delivered-they-have-to-be-necessary-to-enable-the-parties-to-understand-the-reasoning-of-the-decision-and-these-go-too-far/ 2026-06-25T15:08:27Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en ASKING THE JUDGE QUESTIONS AFTER JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED: THEY HAVE TO BE NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE PARTIES TO UNDERSTAND THE REASONING OF THE DECISION (AND THESE GO TOO FAR...) 2026-06-25T15:04:48Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/25/the-current-importance-of-pleadings-83-the-case-of-the-solicitors-lien-the-judge-should-not-have-decided-an-application-to-strike-out-on-the-basis-of-an-unpleaded-case/ 2026-06-25T14:24:16Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 83: THE CASE OF THE SOLICITOR'S LIEN: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE DECIDED AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT ON THE BASIS OF AN UNPLEADED CASE 2026-06-25T09:58:54Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/25/the-new-sra-guidance-on-supervision-7-recording-arrangments-if-it-isnt-written-down-it-hasnt-happened/ 2026-06-24T16:34:40Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON SUPERVISION 7: RECORDING ARRANGMENTS (IF IT ISN'T WRITTEN DOWN IT HASN'T HAPPENED...) 2026-06-25T07:00:41Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/25/an-application-to-set-a-default-judgment-aside-3-the-denton-criteria-considered/ 2026-06-24T14:09:39Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (3): THE DENTON CRITERIA CONSIDERED 2026-06-25T06:00:15Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/24/an-application-to-set-a-default-judgment-aside-2-consideration-of-promptness-when-nothing-happened-for-a-year/ 2026-06-24T13:59:56Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (2): CONSIDERATION OF "PROMPTNESS" WHEN NOTHING HAPPENED FOR A YEAR... 2026-06-24T12:00:39Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/24/the-new-sra-guidance-on-effective-supervision-6-what-is-meant-by-the-conduct-of-litigation-it-turns-out-its-a-matter-of-professional-judgment/ 2026-06-24T09:44:37Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 6: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (IT TURNS OUT ITS A MATTER OF "PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT") 2026-06-24T11:00:55Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/24/an-application-to-set-a-default-judgment-aside-1-the-evidence-as-to-the-merits-the-judge-should-not-have-conducted-a-mini-trial/ 2026-06-24T09:22:51Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en AN APPLICATION TO SET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ASIDE (1): THE EVIDENCE AS TO THE MERITS: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE CONDUCTED A "MINI TRIAL" 2026-06-24T10:00:52Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/24/witness-evidence-wednesday-evidence-by-video-link-from-abroad-a-point-to-watch-some-useful-guidance-and-practical-steps/ 2026-06-24T08:57:00Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: EVIDENCE BY VIDEO LINK FROM ABROAD: A POINT TO WATCH : SOME USEFUL GUIDANCE AND PRACTICAL STEPS 2026-06-24T09:00:24Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/06/24/expert-watch-51-the-expert-valuers-should-have-gone-into-this-exercise-blind-their-credibility-would-be-much-improved/ 2026-06-23T16:02:39Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 51: THE EXPERT VALUERS SHOULD HAVE GONE INTO THIS EXERCISE "BLIND" - THEIR CREDIBILITY WOULD BE "MUCH IMPROVED" 2026-06-24T06:00:35Z Blog