https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/05/back-to-basics-monday-giving-the-source-of-information-in-a-witness-statement-when-there-is-a-corporate-client-problems-keep-occurring/ 2026-07-05T13:31:30Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION IN A WITNESS STATEMENT WHEN THERE IS A CORPORATE CLIENT: PROBLEMS KEEP OCCURRING 2026-07-05T06:00:14Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/03/cost-bites-409-a-part-36-case-to-finish-of-the-week-claim-8-4-million-get-102000-having-turned-down-an-offer-of-3-175-million-it-is-not-unjust-for-the-claimant-to-face-to-normal-part-36-cons/ 2026-07-03T17:58:09Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 409: A PART 36 CASE TO FINISH OFF THE WEEK: CLAIM £8.4 MILLION GET £102,000 (HAVING TURNED DOWN AN OFFER OF £3.175 MILLION): IT IS NOT "UNJUST" FOR THE CLAIMANT TO FACE TO NORMAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES, NOR WOULD THE COURT "PICK AND CHOOSE" IN RELATION TO THE COSTS PAYABLE 2026-07-03T15:00:44Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/03/cost-bites-408-who-if-anyone-should-pay-the-costs-when-the-court-makes-no-decision-on-the-substantive-issue/ 2026-07-03T10:43:08Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en COST BITES 408: WHO (IF ANYONE) SHOULD PAY THE COSTS WHEN THE COURT MAKES NO DECISION ON THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE? 2026-07-03T11:00:51Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/03/throwback-friday-which-witness-will-be-believed-is-it-all-a-lottery-july-2014-issues-of-witness-credibility-considered/ 2026-07-03T09:20:23Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en THROWBACK FRIDAY: "WHICH WITNESS WILL BE BELIEVED? IS IT ALL A LOTTERY? (JULY 2014): ISSUES OF WITNESS CREDIBILITY CONSIDERED 2026-07-03T10:00:53Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/03/expert-watch-54-the-deputy-master-should-not-have-ignored-the-expert-evidence-before-the-court-it-was-relevant-and-addressed-the-central-issue/ 2026-07-02T23:12:29Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en EXPERT WATCH 54 : THE DEPUTY MASTER SHOULD NOT HAVE IGNORED THE EXPERT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT: IT WAS RELEVANT AND ADDRESSED THE CENTRAL ISSUE 2026-07-03T07:00:10Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/07/03/a-solicitor-should-just-not-be-saying-this-is-in-a-witness-statement-it-strayed-well-beyond-what-she-could-legally-give-evidence-about-from-her-own-knowledge-included-hearsay-from-an-unnamed-source/ 2026-07-02T23:15:09Z Civil Litigation Brief ® en A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT "STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE..." 2026-07-03T06:00:21Z Blog