https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/commercial-litigators-on-the-naughty-step-3-why-pd57ac-was-introduced-the-proper-and-sensible-scope-of-evidence-in-chief-is-no-longer-the-stock-in-trade-knowledge-of-those-responsible-for-proofing/ 2026-04-24T13:24:32Z Civil Litigation Brief en COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: "THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES..." 2026-04-24T14:00:21Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/proving-things-288-how-should-a-court-consider-a-claim-for-loss-of-earnings-when-the-claimant-is-still-in-employed-smith-v-manchester-approach-prevails/ 2026-04-24T15:23:57Z Civil Litigation Brief en PROVING THINGS 288: HOW SHOULD A COURT CONSIDER A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS STILL IN EMPLOYMENT? SMITH -v- MANCHESTER APPROACH PREVAILS 2026-04-24T13:00:39Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/claims-for-loss-of-earnings-avoiding-the-pitfalls-webinar-19th-june-2026-together-with-a-useful-questionnaire-and-series-of-checklists/ 2026-04-24T10:19:54Z Civil Litigation Brief en CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS) 2026-04-24T12:00:06Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/the-weaponisation-of-applications-to-commit-in-civil-proceedings-its-not-clever-its-not-tough-and-it-certainly-is-not-a-marketing-tool/ 2026-04-24T09:36:57Z Civil Litigation Brief en THE "WEAPONISATION" OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT'S NOT CLEVER, IT'S NOT "TOUGH" AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL 2026-04-24T10:00:47Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/cost-bites-378-reform-of-the-solicitors-act-1974-part-iii-read-the-consulation-paper-a-chance-to-comment-on-the-provisions-that-are-a-great-mystery-to-many-solicitors-not-my-words/ 2026-04-24T08:52:28Z Civil Litigation Brief en COST BITES 378 : REFORM OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974, PART III: READ THE CONSULATION PAPER: A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE "A GREAT MYSTERY" TO MANY SOLICITORS (NOT MY WORDS...) 2026-04-24T08:52:28Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/24/throwback-friday-schedules-and-counter-schedules-are-not-a-number-crunching-exercise-april-2018/ 2026-04-23T15:56:21Z Civil Litigation Brief en THROWBACK FRIDAY: SCHEDULES AND COUNTER-SCHEDULES ARE NOT A "NUMBER CRUNCHING EXERCISE" (APRIL 2018) 2026-04-24T06:00:58Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/23/witness-statements-served-late-the-court-granted-relief-from-sanctions-be-wary-of-missing-things-when-other-things-are-going-on/ 2026-04-23T13:44:50Z Civil Litigation Brief en WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED LATE: THE COURT GRANTED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - BUT... : BE WARY OF MISSING THINGS WHEN OTHER THINGS ARE GOING ON... 2026-04-23T14:00:38Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/23/mega-cost-bites-378-who-would-spend-15751483-plus-vat-to-recover-damages-of-16-91-welcome-to-the-surreal-world-of-collective-proceedings-the-cat-are-concerned-that-litigation-is-being-brou/ 2026-04-23T14:09:33Z Civil Litigation Brief en COST (MEGA) BITES 378: WHO WOULD SPEND £15,751,483 PLUS VAT TO RECOVER DAMAGES OF £16.91? (WELCOME TO THE SURREAL WORLD OF "COLLECTIVE PROCEEDINGS": THE CAT ARE CONCERNED THAT LITIGATION IS BEING BROUGHT FOR THE LAWYERS & FUNDERS RATHER THAN CONSUMERS 2026-04-23T07:30:26Z Blog https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/04/23/commercial-litigators-on-the-naughty-step-2-non-compliance-with-pd57ac-he-knows-not-of-what-he-speaks/ 2026-04-22T19:37:59Z Civil Litigation Brief en COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 2: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PD57AC: "HE KNOWS NOT OF WHAT HE SPEAKS" 2026-04-23T06:00:26Z Blog