<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-16.1.1'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/21/throwback-friday-avoiding-negligence-claims-in-litigation-an-8-point-survival-guide-august-2019/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-20T16:06:29Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>THROWBACK FRIDAY: AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION AN 8 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE (AUGUST 2019): AND LOOK AT THE LINKS...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-21T11:00:53Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/21/expert-watch-66-red-flags-and-experts-1-the-duty-to-consider-the-range-of-opinions-often-honoured-in-the-breach-often-fatal-to-a-partys-case/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-17T16:09:47Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>EXPERT WATCH 66:  RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN &amp;quot;HONOURED IN THE BREACH&amp;quot;; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY&amp;#039;S CASE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-21T07:00:34Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/21/expert-watch-65-when-the-judges-say-we-attach-very-little-weight-to-a-report-it-is-clear-that-something-has-gone-wrong/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-17T09:54:44Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY &amp;quot;WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT&amp;quot; TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-21T06:00:49Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/20/another-interesting-discussion-about-interest-the-starting-point-is-that-the-claimant-is-entitled-to-be-compensated-for-being-out-of-its-money-no-matter-what-it-would-have-done-with-it/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-19T13:58:14Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ANOTHER INTERESTING DISCUSSION (ABOUT INTEREST...): THE STARTING POINT IS THAT THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO BE COMPENSATED FOR BEING OUT OF ITS MONEY (NO MATTER WHAT IT WOULD HAVE DONE WITH IT...)</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-20T11:00:26Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/20/when-a-court-may-make-no-order-for-costs-the-factors-considered-12-key-points-and-a-useful-checklist-for-practitioners/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-20T06:50:10Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WHEN A COURT MAY MAKE NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE FACTORS CONSIDERED: 12 KEY POINTS AND A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-20T06:00:09Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/19/cost-bites-437-should-the-defendants-conduct-of-the-action-lead-to-indemnity-costs-being-awarded-yes-it-should/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-18T21:23:39Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 437: SHOULD  THE DEFENDANT&amp;#039;S CONDUCT OF THE ACTION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS BEING AWARDED?  YES IT SHOULD...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-19T11:00:48Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/19/interest-on-damages-1-generally-2-after-the-defendant-fails-to-beat-a-part-36-offer-there-is-no-need-to-find-dishonesty-or-serious-conduct-to-award-enhanced-interest/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-18T20:55:26Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>INTEREST ON DAMAGES: (1) GENERALLY; (2) AFTER THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO BEAT A PART 36 OFFER: THERE IS NO NEED TO FIND DISHONESTY OR SERIOUS CONDUCT TO AWARD ENHANCED INTEREST</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-19T09:00:38Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/19/witness-evidence-wednesday-red-flags-and-witness-statements-1-the-witness-that-gives-the-court-their-opinion/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-18T15:52:40Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: RED FLAGS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS (1):  THE WITNESS THAT GIVES THE COURT THEIR OPINION</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-19T06:00:44Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
