<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-16.0.1'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//www.civillitigationbrief.com/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/13/an-order-for-wasted-costs-narrowly-averted-but-then-there-were-issues-on-both-sides-none-of-the-legal-professionals-in-this-case-have-averted-themselves-with-glory/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-12T16:37:30Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>AN ORDER FOR WASTED COSTS NARROWLY AVERTED - BUT THERE WERE ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES:  &amp;quot;NONE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN THIS CASE HAVE AVERTED THEMSELVES WITH GLORY&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-13T08:00:58Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/13/attempts-to-revisit-the-preliminary-issues-refused-also-the-judge-would-have-preferred-to-see-witness-statements-not-just-documents/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-12T15:54:55Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ATTEMPTS TO &amp;quot;REVISIT&amp;quot; THE PRELIMINARY ISSUES REFUSED:  ALSO THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO SEE WITNESS STATEMENTS NOT JUST DOCUMENTS...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-13T07:00:36Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/13/advocacy-the-judges-view-a-recap-of-the-series-3-there-is-a-special-ring-in-hell-for-a-certain-type-of-advocate-why-all-litigators-should-know-these-things/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-12T15:10:43Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>ADVOCACY THE JUDGE&amp;#039;S VIEW A RECAP OF THE SERIES 3: &amp;quot;THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE&amp;quot;: WHY ALL LITIGATORS SHOULD KNOW THESE THINGS...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-13T06:00:36Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/12/witness-evidence-wednesday-the-paucity-of-evidence-provided-by-the-defendants-an-application-for-summary-judgment-cannot-be-defended-by-bare-assertion/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-11T22:13:02Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS: AN APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY &amp;quot;BARE ASSERTION&amp;quot;</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-12T07:00:34Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/12/cost-bites-433-what-are-significant-developments-when-you-want-to-vary-a-costs-budget-why-there-were-no-such-developments-here/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-11T21:42:01Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 433: WHAT ARE &amp;quot;SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS&amp;quot; WHEN YOU WANT TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET? WHY THERE WERE NO SUCH DEVELOPMENTS HERE</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-12T06:00:21Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/11/cost-bites-432-the-court-cannot-alter-the-costs-budget-unless-there-is-are-significant-developments-high-court-decision/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-12T22:51:17Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 432:  THE COURT CANNOT ALTER THE COSTS BUDGET UNLESS THERE ARE &amp;quot;SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS&amp;quot; : HIGH COURT DECISION</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:30:29Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/11/cost-bites-431-a-case-where-both-sides-needed-relief-from-sanctions-so-that-they-could-argue-issues-of-costs-the-problems-flock-together/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-10T21:35:54Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>COST BITES 431: A CASE WHERE BOTH SIDES NEEDED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS SO THAT THEY COULD ARGUE ISSUES OF COSTS: THE PROBLEMS FLOCK TOGETHER...</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-11T08:00:07Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/11/service-points-53-how-does-the-court-protect-the-position-of-a-party-who-wants-to-appeal-decision-in-relation-to-jurisdiction-but-risks-accepting-jurisdiction-in-the-meantime-a-puzzle-solved-by/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-10T16:17:02Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>SERVICE POINTS 53:  HOW DOES THE COURT PROTECT THE POSITION OF A PARTY WHO WANTS TO APPEAL DECISION IN RELATION TO JURISDICTION BUT RISKS &amp;quot;ACCEPTING&amp;quot; JURISDICTION IN THE MEANTIME? A PUZZLE SOLVED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-11T07:00:02Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2026/08/11/should-an-assessment-of-damages-go-ahead-pending-an-appeal-8-million-costs-could-help-avoid-45-million/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-08-10T15:40:35Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Civil Litigation Brief ®</news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>SHOULD AN ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES GO AHEAD PENDING AN APPEAL? £8 MILLION COSTS COULD HELP AVOID £45 MILLION: THE TRIAL COULD MATERIALLY ADVANCE THE LITIGATION AND NARROW FUTURE DISPUTES</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-08-11T06:00:19Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
