Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure Rules

SERVICE POINTS 39: ISSUES OVER CORRECT SPANISH ADDRESS DID NOT RENDER SERVICE INVALID

May 12, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Here we have a case as to service when the claimant was successful.  There were issues as to service as to the correct address and the correct means of service in Spain.  The claimant adduced evidence from a Spanish lawyer…

COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING "MIXED" SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO...)

COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING “MIXED” SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO…)

May 12, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

This judgment considers issues relating to the liability of costs, reasons why “mixed” success should lead to a reduction and the appropriate quantum for costs on a summary assessment.  There are also interesting issues here in relation to hourly rates…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 71: COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO AMEND EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT CASE WAS "UNTENABLE": LESSONS HERE FOR EVERYONE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 71: COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO AMEND EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT CASE WAS “UNTENABLE”: LESSONS HERE FOR EVERYONE

May 11, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we have a case where the judge refused the claimant permission to amend the Particulars of Claim in circumstances where it was conceded that the current pleading was “untenable”.   There are important lessons here for everyone involved in preparing…

THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR - FROM NICE LAWYERS (MAY 2020)

THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE GOOD STUFF ABOUT BEING A LITIGATOR – FROM NICE LAWYERS (MAY 2020)

May 8, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Well being

In May 2020 we were in the grip of the COVID crisis.   Many of the posts from that period deal with issues arising from COVID, including a series (“The (Not So) Lonely Litigator’s Club – which looked at how people…

PROVING THINGS 289: CLAIMANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH BASIC FACT OF ASBESTOS EXPOSURE

PROVING THINGS 289: CLAIMANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH BASIC FACT OF ASBESTOS EXPOSURE

May 5, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Personal Injury, Uncategorized, Witness statements

This is another case that highlights the evidential difficulties of establishing exposure in asbestos cases. The principal victim is often dead, the claimant (usually a widow) cannot give direct evidence of the facts of exposure and the case is reliant…

COST (MEGA) BITES 382: THE AMOUNT WAS "STAGGERING" BUT THE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH AN ARBITRATOR'S AWARD OF $26 MILLION FOR COSTS

COST (MEGA) BITES 382: THE AMOUNT WAS “STAGGERING” BUT THE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH AN ARBITRATOR’S AWARD OF $26 MILLION FOR COSTS

May 5, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

Anyone going through a detailed assessment of costs can look ruefully at this judgment about costs in arbitration proceedings. The arbitrator awarded $26 million in costs based on very scant information.  As it turns out the courts had no power…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 69: ALLEGATIONS OF DISHONESTY SHOULD HAVE PLEADED: IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO QUESTION WITNESSES ON THE BASIS THAT THEY HAD ACCEPTED A PROPOSITION WHEN THEY HAD NOT DONE SO

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 69: ALLEGATIONS OF DISHONESTY SHOULD HAVE PLEADED: IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO QUESTION WITNESSES ON THE BASIS THAT THEY HAD ACCEPTED A PROPOSITION WHEN THEY HAD NOT DONE SO

May 5, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Statements of Case

There are several matters of interest in this judgment given last Friday. Firstly that allegations of fraudulent conduct were made when those assertions had not been pleaded.  Secondly the judge was critical of the attempt to cross-examine witnesses on the…

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHAT AFFECT DOES A BANK HOLIDAY HAVE ON THE COMPUTATION OF TIME UNDER THE CPR?

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHAT AFFECT DOES A BANK HOLIDAY HAVE ON THE COMPUTATION OF TIME UNDER THE CPR?

May 4, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Normally there are no posts on bank holidays. But this subject is apposite. If you are having a day off today, what impact does a bank holiday have on the computation of time.   COMPUTATION OF TIME AND BANK HOLIDAYS…

WEBINAR ON PD57AC WITNESS STATEMENTS: NOW AVAILABLE "ON DEMAND": IF YOU MISSED IT YOU CAN STILL WATCH IT...

WEBINAR ON PD57AC WITNESS STATEMENTS: NOW AVAILABLE “ON DEMAND”: IF YOU MISSED IT YOU CAN STILL WATCH IT…

May 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Webinar, Witness statements

The webinar on Mastering PD57AC – Getting Witness Statements Right in the Commercial Courts is now available “on demand”.   You can watch it at your leisure. Booking details are available here. The webinar includes a series of checklists and a…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 68: COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS THAT THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED AMENDMENTS: THE PLEADINGS WERE "INCOHERENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INSUFFICIENTLY PARTICULARISED"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 68: COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS THAT THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED AMENDMENTS: THE PLEADINGS WERE “INCOHERENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INSUFFICIENTLY PARTICULARISED”

April 30, 2026 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we have a rare case where the Court of Appeal overturns a decision of the first instance judge to allow a party to amend their pleadings.  There is a detailed analysis of why the proposed amendments were deficient. “I…

SERVICE POINTS 38: THE CLAIMANT SERVES AT THE WRONG ADDRESS BUT THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPLY IN TIME (A CLASSIC STORY)

SERVICE POINTS 38: THE CLAIMANT SERVES AT THE WRONG ADDRESS BUT THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPLY IN TIME (A CLASSIC STORY)

April 30, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

This is a case where lessons can be learnt by both claimants and defendants. The claimant served at the wrong address, however the defendant did not respond promptly or timeously. KEY PRACTICE POINT There are lessons here for both parties….

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: KEEPING COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS OFF THE NAUGHTY STEP: WEBINAR PLUS USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND PRECEDENTS: 30th APRIL 2026

April 29, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Webinar, Witness statements

For the past week we have looked at cases where judges have been critical of the failure to comply with the provisions of PD57AC.  These issues are being addressed in the webinar tomorrow. In addition to looking at the guidance…

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 5: PD57AC AND REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS: WHY LAWYERS NEED TO BE PRISED AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT BLANKETS

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 5: PD57AC AND REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS: WHY LAWYERS NEED TO BE PRISED AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT BLANKETS

April 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

PD57AC is very prescriptive in the guidance it gives in relation to the way in which documents are referred to in witness statements.  This is another example of a rule that is often breached, with statements often referring to, and…

THE DEFENDANT WAS OUT OF TIME FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: THE COURT DID NOT HAVE POWER AT THIS STAGE IN ANY EVENT

THE DEFENDANT WAS OUT OF TIME FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: THE COURT DID NOT HAVE POWER AT THIS STAGE IN ANY EVENT

April 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

This judgment provides a short reminder that if a party wants to seek permission to appeal from the court that made the decision then that application must be made  at the hearing being appealed itself, or any adjournment of that…

IS AN APPLICATION VALID IF THE INCORRECT  COURT FEE IS PAID?  THE ISSUES CONSIDERED...

IS AN APPLICATION VALID IF THE INCORRECT COURT FEE IS PAID? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED…

April 28, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content

We have had a flurry of cases recently about the consequences of failing to pay the correct fee when issuing proceedings.  Here we have a case where the court considers the implications of a failure to pay the correct fee…

SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH - AND BY THE WAY - AS IT TURNS OUT - THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE

SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH – AND BY THE WAY – AS IT TURNS OUT – THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE

April 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Is service on a P.O. Box address good service?  That was the issue being considered in this appeal.  However the claimant was in for a bit of a shock.  Enquiries by the judge revealed that the claim form had never…

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 4: WHY IS PD57AC BREACHED SO OFTEN? "SOLICITORS MIGHT FEEL UNDER PRESSURE TO SIGN CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE ... EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW THAT STATEMENTS WERE NOT COMPLIANT..."

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 4: WHY IS PD57AC BREACHED SO OFTEN? “SOLICITORS MIGHT FEEL UNDER PRESSURE TO SIGN CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE … EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW THAT STATEMENTS WERE NOT COMPLIANT…”

April 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Webinar

There has a been a regular flow of cases where the courts have commented that PD57AC has not been complied with,  it is “more honoured in the breach than the observance”, was noted in one judgment.   Given that these are…

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN YOU ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE THE COURT HAS TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WILL ALL COST...

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN YOU ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE THE COURT HAS TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WILL ALL COST…

April 27, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Here we are looking at a basic requirement that is often overlooked.  When a party is applying for permission to rely on expert evidence there is a mandatory obligation to provide the court with an estimate of costs.     THE…

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: "THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES..."

COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: “THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES…”

April 24, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

It is useful to remember why the strictures in PSD57AC were introduced.   It followed  the report of the Witness Evidence Working Group  which was produced at the end of 2019.  That report highlighted some major issues in relation to the…

CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)

CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)

April 24, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Personal Injury, Webinar, Witness statements

It is surprising how many allegations of negligence are made against lawyers because of a failure to consider and obtain damages for loss of earnings.  In addition there are a growing number of cases where claimants have come to grief…

SERVICE POINTS 36 : "THIS IS AN AREA OF UNDOUBTED STRICTNESS": ERRORS IN SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM WERE FATAL TO THE CLAIM

SERVICE POINTS 36 : “THIS IS AN AREA OF UNDOUBTED STRICTNESS”: ERRORS IN SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM WERE FATAL TO THE CLAIM

April 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

Regular readers of this site will not need reminding of the strictness of the rules relating to service of the claim form.  Here we have another example. The claimant failed to serve the sealed claim form within the period allowed…

COST BITES 377: THE COURT WOULD NOT STAY A PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT PENDING THE DEFENDANT'S APPEAL AND/OR APPLICATION FOR A RIGHT TO SET OFF THEIR OWN COSTS (WHY WHAT IS TAKEN OUT OF DRAFT ORDER CAN BE AS IMPORTANT AS WHAT IS LEFT IN...)

COST BITES 377: THE COURT WOULD NOT STAY A PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT PENDING THE DEFENDANT’S APPEAL AND/OR APPLICATION FOR A RIGHT TO SET OFF THEIR OWN COSTS (WHY WHAT IS TAKEN OUT OF DRAFT ORDER CAN BE AS IMPORTANT AS WHAT IS LEFT IN…)

April 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Interim Payments, Members Content

Here we have an unusual issue, caused by the defendant agreeing to an unusual order (more accurately the removal of a proposed term of an order). The defendant was liable to pay the claimant’s costs of a hearing which were…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY:  COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP AGAIN (GUESS THE REASON...): YOUR STATEMENTS DID COMPLY WITH PD57AC SO WE ARE JUST GOING TO IGNORE THE ERRANT PARTS

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP AGAIN (GUESS THE REASON…): YOUR STATEMENTS DID COMPLY WITH PD57AC SO WE ARE JUST GOING TO IGNORE THE ERRANT PARTS

April 22, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Here we have (yet another) case about a failure to comply with PD57AC.  The response of the defendants here was simply to state that they would not cross-examine the claimants’ witnesses on material that was irrelevant or inadmissible. “I was…

SERVICE POINTS 35: HOT OFF THE PRESS:  THE HIGH COURT UPHOLDS INITIAL FINDING THAT AN ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RE-SEALED PRIOR TO SERVICE

SERVICE POINTS 35: HOT OFF THE PRESS: THE HIGH COURT UPHOLDS INITIAL FINDING THAT AN ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RE-SEALED PRIOR TO SERVICE

April 21, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

The cases on service of the claim form continue to flow.  Here the defendant appealed a decision that it was not necessary for a claimant to serve a sealed copy of an amended claim form.   As we shall see the…

EXPERT WATCH 43: WHEN AN EXPERT DOESN'T HAVE "REAL WORLD"  EXPERIENCE OF THE MATTERS IN THEIR REPORT - THEY START ON THE BACK FOOT...

EXPERT WATCH 43: WHEN AN EXPERT DOESN’T HAVE “REAL WORLD” EXPERIENCE OF THE MATTERS IN THEIR REPORT – THEY START ON THE BACK FOOT…

April 20, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The previous post on costs and mediation led to me to look at the initial judgment on liability.   This is because the court considered an argument that the situation with the claimant’s expert was so poor as to warrant indemnity…

AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP - BUT HINDER: "I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT'S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME"

AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP – BUT HINDER: “I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT’S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME”

April 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Here we have a case where an important time limit was, on the face of it missed, because the court itself “thwarted” genuine attempts to lodge an appeal in time.  It is an object lesson the care that needs to…

THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DANGERS OF LETTING WITNESSES GIVE "OPINION" EVIDENCE: TWELVE YEARS ON AND THINGS MAY HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT MUCH: APRIL 2014

THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DANGERS OF LETTING WITNESSES GIVE “OPINION” EVIDENCE: TWELVE YEARS ON AND THINGS MAY HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT MUCH: APRIL 2014

April 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at at post from twelve years ago concerning judicial protestations about opinion evidence in witness statements. Despite all the warnings have occurred since, and the advent of PD57AC, this remains a regular (and improper) occurrence.  We looked…

"OVERHEATED LANGUAGE" A "CAVALIER APPROACH" AND "THIN ALLEGATIONS": WHY IT PAYS TO BE CAREFUL AND DETAILED WHEN MAKING APPLICATIONS TO DISCHARGE INJUNCTIONS

“OVERHEATED LANGUAGE” A “CAVALIER APPROACH” AND “THIN ALLEGATIONS”: WHY IT PAYS TO BE CAREFUL AND DETAILED WHEN MAKING APPLICATIONS TO DISCHARGE INJUNCTIONS

April 16, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We have seen many cases where the courts have been critical of a party’s failure to comply with the duties of full and frank disclosure when obtaining an order without notice. However here we have a case where the judge…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE COMMERCIAL COURT REPORT AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: PD57AC WAS FIVE YEARS OLD THIS MONTH - STILL GUIDANCE IS NEEDED

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE COMMERCIAL COURT REPORT AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: PD57AC WAS FIVE YEARS OLD THIS MONTH – STILL GUIDANCE IS NEEDED

April 15, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The Business and Property Courts – The Commercial Court Report 2024-2025 makes interesting reading. It notes that PD57AC came into force some five years ago.  It still shows the need to emphasise that the Practice Direction needs to be complied…

CIVIL EVIDENCE: "BARE ASSERTIONS" ARE INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A DISPUTED DEBT NOR WILL "VAGUE AND UNPARTICULARISED" EVIDENCE

CIVIL EVIDENCE: “BARE ASSERTIONS” ARE INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A DISPUTED DEBT NOR WILL “VAGUE AND UNPARTICULARISED” EVIDENCE

April 14, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

This case serves as a reminder that, if a debt is to be disputed, then the evidence in support of the denial has to be particularised and credible.  Here the respondents faced a debt of  £920,000. There was an attempt…

A REMINDER - DOCUMENTS IN AN AGREED BUNDLE ARE ADMISSIBLE AT THE HEARING AS EVIDENCE OF THEIR CONTENTS.

A REMINDER – DOCUMENTS IN AN AGREED BUNDLE ARE ADMISSIBLE AT THE HEARING AS EVIDENCE OF THEIR CONTENTS.

April 14, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We are just looking at a few lines from a judgment we looked at earlier this morning. They contain a reminder that documents in an agreed bundle are admissible as evidence at the hearing.  However this does not mean that…

MAZUR MATTERS 60: THE REVISED LAW SOCIETY GUIDANCE NOTE: SOME KEY POINTS: THIS WILL REQUIRE CLOSER OVERSIGHT OF THE WORK BEING DONE

MAZUR MATTERS 60: THE REVISED LAW SOCIETY GUIDANCE NOTE: SOME KEY POINTS: THIS WILL REQUIRE CLOSER OVERSIGHT OF THE WORK BEING DONE

April 14, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

One remarkable aspect of the Mazur decision is that in a very real sense it is the losers of the case who get to decide what goes on going forward.  The Court of Appeal rejected the submissions of the Law Society…

AN "EXTERNAL" REPORT IS RELEVANT TO THE ISSUES IN THE CASE BUT THE JUDGE WILL DETERMINE ALL KEY MATTERS THEMSELVES..

AN “EXTERNAL” REPORT IS RELEVANT TO THE ISSUES IN THE CASE BUT THE JUDGE WILL DETERMINE ALL KEY MATTERS THEMSELVES..

April 14, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have, for many years now, been looking at the way in which the courts consider the admissibility of reports prepared for related purposes.  We have that issue considered in this case.  A report was obtained in relation to allegations…

THERE WAS NO AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME  FOR SERVICE AS THE DEFENDANT ASSERTED: THE SCCO REFUSES TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE

THERE WAS NO AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE AS THE DEFENDANT ASSERTED: THE SCCO REFUSES TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT COSTS CERTIFICATE

April 13, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment, Witness statements

This is an interesting judgement on two levels. Firstly the judge did not accept the defendant’s contention that there had been an agreement to extend time for service of Points of Dispute to a bill of costs. Secondly, applying the…

MAZUR MATTERS 59: REMEMBER THAT MOST OF THIS AROSE BECAUSE SOMEONE DIDN'T KNOW (OR APPLY) THE CORRECT RULES AS TO FIXED COSTS

MAZUR MATTERS 59: REMEMBER THAT MOST OF THIS AROSE BECAUSE SOMEONE DIDN’T KNOW (OR APPLY) THE CORRECT RULES AS TO FIXED COSTS

April 13, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fixed Costs, Members Content

One underlying irony about the Mazur debacle is that most of the problems arise because of a mistake as to costs.  The Circuit Judge ordered Ms. Mazur and Mr Stuart £10,653 when, in fact, the costs should only have  been £636.00. …

WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION

WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHEN THEY WERE MISTAKEN AS TO WHO THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES CAUSATION

April 10, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Costs, Members Content, Wasted Costs

In this case a wasted costs order was made against a firm of solicitors for breach of warranty of authority. The stated to the defendant and the court, and believed, that they were instructed by the claimant’s insurers when, in…

SERVICE POINTS 33: COURT MADE AN ORDER FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON A RUSSIAN COMPANY'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

SERVICE POINTS 33: COURT MADE AN ORDER FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON A RUSSIAN COMPANY’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

April 9, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Here was have a successful application for alternative service on the defendant’s legal representatives.  It shows that in some circumstances the courts are willing to make such orders, particularly when the defendant is based abroad and there are potential issues…

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE RELEVANCE OF DELAY AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: THE RELEVANCE OF DELAY AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

April 9, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

For many years now we have been looking at the interaction between an application to set aside a default judgment and the “Denton” criteria.   Here we look at another case where the court considered relief from sanctions in this context. …

THE JUDGE FOUND AGAINST ME BECAUSE THEY GAVE TOO MUCH LEEWAY TO A LITIGANT IN PERSON : ALLEGATIONS OF THIS KIND SHOULD BE PARTICULARISED (AND CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT)

THE JUDGE FOUND AGAINST ME BECAUSE THEY GAVE TOO MUCH LEEWAY TO A LITIGANT IN PERSON : ALLEGATIONS OF THIS KIND SHOULD BE PARTICULARISED (AND CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT)

April 9, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Here we consider some unusual grounds of appeal.  An unsuccessful claimant appealed on the grounds, inter alia, that the judge had erred in giving leeway to the defendant who was a litigant in person. What is important here is that…

USEFUL CHECKLISTS TO HELP ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MAZUR: PART OF THE MATERIALS PROVIDED WITH THE WEBINAR ON THE 9th APRIL

USEFUL CHECKLISTS TO HELP ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MAZUR: PART OF THE MATERIALS PROVIDED WITH THE WEBINAR ON THE 9th APRIL

April 7, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Webinar

The webinar on Thursday provides a wealth of material in relation to compliance with the Court of Appeal guidance as to the conduct of litigation after  the Court of Appeal decision in Mazur. In addition there is a series of…

MAZUR MATTERS 58: LEARN HOW TO SUPERVISE STAFF PROPERLY - OR RISK GOING TO JAIL: IT IS WISE TO RECORD SUPERVISION ARRANGEMENTS FULLY

MAZUR MATTERS 58: LEARN HOW TO SUPERVISE STAFF PROPERLY – OR RISK GOING TO JAIL: IT IS WISE TO RECORD SUPERVISION ARRANGEMENTS FULLY

April 7, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Webinar

One key element of the Mazur decision, that needs repeating, is that it does not allow unauthorised persons to “conduct” litigation.  It allows unauthorised people to assist and conduct the tasks involved in litigation so long as they are properly…

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY (ON A TUESDAY...) : THE RULES ABOUT SERVING NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS: SERVE AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE - OR TAKE THE RISK

BACK TO BASICS MONDAY (ON A TUESDAY…) : THE RULES ABOUT SERVING NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS: SERVE AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE – OR TAKE THE RISK

April 7, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There are cases where those making applications make a tactical decision not to serve the application at once. They think, wrongly, that the rules only require three days notice to be given.  This belief if wrong. As we shall see…

MAXIMISING RECOVERY IN INTER PARTIES COSTS: THE ROLE OF THE FEE EARNER: WEBINAR 9th APRIL 2026: 12.00 pm: TRYING TO MAKE SURE YOU OBTAIN MAXIMUM RECOVERY ON ASSESSMENT

MAXIMISING RECOVERY IN INTER PARTIES COSTS: THE ROLE OF THE FEE EARNER: WEBINAR 9th APRIL 2026: 12.00 pm: TRYING TO MAKE SURE YOU OBTAIN MAXIMUM RECOVERY ON ASSESSMENT

April 6, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs

This webinar examines the crucial role of the fee earner in maximising the recovery of legal costs. Many litigators have limited experience of detailed assessments and may be unaware of the challenges that can arise during the process. The session…

ANOTHER CASE ON FAILING TO PAY THE COURT FEE: AN APPEAL WAS STILL LODGED IN TIME EVEN THOUGH NO FEE WAS PAID AT ALL

ANOTHER CASE ON FAILING TO PAY THE COURT FEE: AN APPEAL WAS STILL LODGED IN TIME EVEN THOUGH NO FEE WAS PAID AT ALL

April 2, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Court fees, Members Content

Here we have a case that extends the principles in Siniakovich v Hassan-Soudey. The Court of Appeal held that a statutory appeal was lodged within time, even though it was sent by email to the court and no fee was…

MAZUR MATTERS 54: THINGS WE STILL DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO (1)  WHAT IS MEANT BY "THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? THE COURT DID NOT SUPPLY AN "EXHAUSTIVE DEFINITION"

MAZUR MATTERS 54: THINGS WE STILL DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER TO (1) WHAT IS MEANT BY “THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? THE COURT DID NOT SUPPLY AN “EXHAUSTIVE DEFINITION”

April 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment given yesterday still leaves us with many uncertainties and litigators still need to tread with some care.  Here we look at one of the matters that the Court of Appeal was not able to give a definitive answer…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: COURT STRIKES OUT PARTS OF DEFENDANT'S WITNESS STATEMENT  AS NON COMPLIANT WITH PD57AC (AND THE DEFENDANT IS A BARRISTER...)

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: COURT STRIKES OUT PARTS OF DEFENDANT’S WITNESS STATEMENT AS NON COMPLIANT WITH PD57AC (AND THE DEFENDANT IS A BARRISTER…)

April 1, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out, Witness statements

This case adds to the growing number of cases where the courts have considered whether a  witness statement breaches PD 57AC and the consequences for breach.  The  defendant’s initial statement contained numerous breaches of PD57. A revised statement was more…

THE MAZUR DECISION TODAY 5: THE "NUANCED" BITS: IT IS ALL ABOUT DELEGATION OF TASKS AND SUPERVISION (AND HERE IT IS OVER TO THE REGULATORS...)

THE MAZUR DECISION TODAY 5: THE “NUANCED” BITS: IT IS ALL ABOUT DELEGATION OF TASKS AND SUPERVISION (AND HERE IT IS OVER TO THE REGULATORS…)

March 31, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Uncategorized

I have already written that the judgement is Mazur is far more nuanced than many commentators have suggested.  It does not give a “free for all” for non-authorised persons to litigate. Rather it gives authorised lawyers the ability to delegate…

THE MAZUR DECISION TODAY 3: NO DEFINITIVE DEFINITION OF THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION: BUT WE DO HAVE THE "MAGNIFICENT SEVEN"

THE MAZUR DECISION TODAY 3: NO DEFINITIVE DEFINITION OF THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION: BUT WE DO HAVE THE “MAGNIFICENT SEVEN”

March 31, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content

We continue our look at the judgment today by looking at the court’s more detailed consideration of what was meant by the “conduct of litigation”.  The court did not give a definition. However it did give seven key points as to…

PROVING THINGS 285: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES THAT THE CLAIMANT WAS FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: "IT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH QOCS TO EXTEND IT TO CLAIMANTS WHO KNOWINGLY TELL UNTRUTHS ABOUT SOMETHING FUNDAMENTAL TO THEIR CLAIM..."

PROVING THINGS 285: THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES THAT THE CLAIMANT WAS FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: “IT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH QOCS TO EXTEND IT TO CLAIMANTS WHO KNOWINGLY TELL UNTRUTHS ABOUT SOMETHING FUNDAMENTAL TO THEIR CLAIM…”

March 31, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

This is a judgment on fundamental dishonesty where the judge considers, in some detail, the burden of proof and what a defendant needs to establish.  There are important observations about the burden of proof and consideration of the term “dishonesty”…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 65: THE REASON WHY PLEADINGS ARE IMPORTANT IN ALL TYPES OF CASES: "IF THE DEFENDANT FEELS SHE HAS FAILED TO ESTABLISH ANY PART OF HER CASE BY REASON OF INADEQUATE PLEADINGS ... SHE MAY NEED TO TAKE THAT UP WITH HER SOLICITORS..."

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 65: THE REASON WHY PLEADINGS ARE IMPORTANT IN ALL TYPES OF CASES: “IF THE DEFENDANT FEELS SHE HAS FAILED TO ESTABLISH ANY PART OF HER CASE BY REASON OF INADEQUATE PLEADINGS … SHE MAY NEED TO TAKE THAT UP WITH HER SOLICITORS…”

March 30, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

I appreciate that today has been a “pleadings heavy” day on this site. However the reason for this is that pleadings are important across the board.  Earlier today we looked at pleadings in a multi-million pound dispute between two banks.  Here…

1 2 … 28 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AN INSURER’S ADMISSION BINDS INSURED DEFENDANT EVEN THOUGH INDEMNITY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN: APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM THAT ADMISSION DISMISSED…
  • SERVICE POINTS 39: ISSUES OVER CORRECT SPANISH ADDRESS DID NOT RENDER SERVICE INVALID
  • COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING “MIXED” SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO…)
  • WHEN A CASE – WEEKS AWAY FROM TRIAL WAS “UNTENABLE”: HOW DID WE GET HERE?
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 71: COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO AMEND EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT CASE WAS “UNTENABLE”: LESSONS HERE FOR EVERYONE

Top Posts

  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHAT TO WEAR TO COURT: "IF YOU ATTEND COURT DRESSED INAPPROPRIATELY, COURT STAFF MAY REFUSE YOU ENTRY"
  • AN INSURER'S ADMISSION BINDS INSURED DEFENDANT EVEN THOUGH INDEMNITY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN: APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM THAT ADMISSION DISMISSED...
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 71: COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO AMEND EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT CASE WAS "UNTENABLE": LESSONS HERE FOR EVERYONE
  • WHEN A CASE - WEEKS AWAY FROM TRIAL WAS "UNTENABLE": HOW DID WE GET HERE?
  • COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING "MIXED" SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO...)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.