COST BITES 448: PART 36 AND FIXED COSTS: “VERY LATE” ACCEPTANCE OF A DEFENDANT’S OFFER LEADS TO THE CLAIMANT RECOVERING NO COSTS AT ALL
It was probably inevitable that there would be difficulties in the construction of fixed costs and the interplay with Part 36. We have such a case here. The Court had to consider the implications of the precise wording of fixed…
SERVICE POINTS 56 : PERSONAL SERVICE NOT EFFECTED: COURT RETROSPECTIVELY APPROVES ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
There are very particular issues relating to service of committal proceedings. Normally an application has to be served personally. Sometimes, however, this is not easy. In this case the judge retrospectively authorised service of a committal application by an alternative…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: A CASE WHERE THE SOLICITORS’ EVIDENCE (OF THEIR OWN) LOSS WAS “WHOLLY INADEQUATE” (OCTOBER 2017)
The “Proving Things” series has recently passed number 300. A large number of the posts in that series are about a failure to prove things. We have here a claim brought by a firm of solicitors where the judge observed…
WILL AN INSURER PAY FOR THIS? A CRUCIAL QUESTION FOR MOST PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIMANTS: WEBINAR 30th OCTOBER 2026
The post earlier today about the difficulties in enforcing a judgment in a clinical negligence case against an individual doctor highlights the problems that arise if a defendant is not insured. The issue of when an insurer is liable to…
“LITIGATION SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS”: “THESE EPISTOLARY COMMUNICATIONS WERE LESS THAN SATISFACTORY…”
There is one brief observation in this judgment which is of some importance in relation to the way that litigators communicate with the court. Attempting to manage a case by correspondence is usually not satisfactory. “Court systems are not well…
ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 6: BEING SIGNED OFF WORK DOES NOT MEAN UNABLE TO ATTEND COURT: SUSPENDED COMMITTAL ORDER MADE AGAINST JUDGMENT DEBTOR (CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE AND PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATORS YOU MAY WANT TO READ THIS AS WELL…)
It is rare for a clinical negligence claimant to be involved in issues relating to the enforcement of judgments. We have an example here. Ironically enough it is also an example of inadequate medical evidence being presented in an an…
PROVING THINGS 301 : CAN AN APPLICANT IN COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS RELY UPON A JUDGMENT GIVEN AT TRIAL? WHAT WEIGHT SHOULD BE GIVEN TO IT?
It is always interesting to see the sequel of cases we have looked at earlier. We have an example here. We looked at this case in the context of a finding of fundamental d dishonesty. Different issues arise in relation…
EXPERT WATCH 79: WHEN A LITIGANT INSTRUCTS AN EXPERT AND THEN SEEKS PERMISSION TO RELY ON THEM: MIXED RESULTS
A party instructing an expert without obtaining permission from the court in advance runs a risk. Considerable expenditure can be incurred and yet the court may refuse permission. However, on occasions, it is necessary to actually have the report to…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHERE ARE WE NOW ON “MISSING” WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE ? TEN KEY POINTS WITH USEFUL LINKS
Much of litigation is taken up with the contents of witness statements and their veracity, or otherwise. However there is an important element in relation to missing evidence and “missing” witnesses. What inferences should the court draw if a…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 101: PUTTING A FIGURE IN THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM DOES NOT NECESSARILY ENTITLE A CLAIMANT TO DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR THAT SUM
Does the fact that a specific sum is claimed in the Particulars entitle a claimant to enter default judgment in that sum? Sometimes the answer to that question is no. That was the issue being considered in in this case. …
EXPERT WATCH 78 : “ROWING BACK”?: WHEN AN EXPERT CHANGES THEIR VIEW AFTER THE JOINT REPORT: “THAT IS NOT THE FAIR OR PROPER WAY FOR PUTTING NEW EXPERT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT”
Here we look at a case where an expert essentially changed their mind after a joint report. Although the expert stated that he had not “rowed back” the judge was clear that there had been a change of view and…
COST BITES 465 : WITHOUT PREJUDICE COSTS BREAKDOWNS REMAINED PRIVILEGED: A LOWER BILL DID NOT ESTABLISH “UNAMBIGUOUS IMPROPRIETY”
This judgment given today highlights some dangers in sending “without prejudice” bills of costs at an early stage. The paying party can (understandably) be suspicious when a later bill comes at a lower figure. The reasons for this need not…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: “STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR: THINGS WILL GO WRONG: “YOU GOTTA HAVE A PLAN”: DON’T CRASH…” (OCTOBER 2019)
Today we go back to a post in October 2019. It was part of a series of posts about “staying sane as a litigator”. This was the fifth in the series and makes the point that things go wrong in…
COST BITES 464 : THE IMPORTANCE OF MAKING A PROPER APPLICATION TO VARY A COSTS CAP: TICKING A BOX IS NOT ENOUGH: THE COURT APPLIES THE £5,000 AARHUS LIMIT: SOMETHING TO CHEW THE CUD OVER
It is not often we get to consider the issue of costs and cattle. Here the issue is considered in relation to costs limits imposed by the Aarhus Cap and delay by the defendants in challenging the application of the…
COST BITES 463: HOW SHOULD A COSTS ORDER BE PHRASED? MAKING SURE THAT IT DOES NOT JUST OVER “COUNSEL STANDING ON THEIR FEET DURING THE APPLICATION”
Here we have an unusual disagreement about how an order for costs should be phrased. The judge made it clear that the order should make it clear that it was not just covering advocacy. “I prefer the Bourlakovas’ formulation. It…
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT… INTERIM ORDERS FOR COSTS: 10 KEY POINTS AND USEFUL LINKS
We have looked at the issue of interim costs twice over the past few days. It is an important element of litigation. An order for costs does not put money in the receiving party’s bank account. Detailed assessment may take…
COST BITES 462: A “TOP-HEAVY” LEGAL TEAM AND £929,000 CLAIMED IN COSTS: COURT ORDERS A PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF LESS THAN 50%: THE “RULE OF THUMB” OF 60% IS NO ALWAYS APPROPRIATE
We are returning to the case we looked at yesterday. Having determined that it was appropriate for the court to order the applicants to pay the respondents’ costs of the application the judge then considered the question of the amount…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 99: ONCE AGAIN – A BARE DENIAL WILL NOT DO: DEFENCE STRUCK OUT: “THIS RULE IS NOT A MATTER OF FORMALITY”
This is far from the first time that we have looked at cases that have shown how a bare denial in a pleading is inadequate. Here Chief Master Shuman emphasised the real danger of pleading a bare denial. The defence…
HOUSING CASES AND ALLOCATION TO THE FAST TRACK: THE FACT THAT THE CLAIM WAS BASED ON AN EARLIER COMPROMISE DID NOT MEAN THAT THIS WAS A SMALL CLAIMS TRACK MATTER
Here we have an interesting decision on whether a dispute about a settlement agreement in a housing disrepair case should be allocated to the Small Claims Track. I am grateful to Steve Cornforth for sending me a copy of this…
THE DANGERS OF DELAY: A CASE WHERE THE COURT CRITICISES LATE SERVICE: IT IS IMPLICIT THAT COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE SERVED IN A “TIMELY MANNER”
This is the third case of the day about delay. Here there was a delay of eleven months in serving an order on named defendants. The judge found it unsatisfactory that the claimant council had not served the order in…
LEAVING FILING UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE IS “COURTING DISASTER”: ONE DAY OUT AND NO EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED
The previous post mentioned that a theme of today is the importance of complying with rules and directions. This case demonstrates that point clearly. The appellant was one day out in compliance and still no extension of time was given….
PARTIES SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED: JUDGE HIGHLY CRITICAL OF DEFENDANT’S CONDUCT OF LITIGATION
If there is a theme for today it is the importance of compliance with rules and directions. Here we have very strong criticism of the defendant Secretary of State (more accurately his legal team). The judge observed that the defendant’s…
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … OPPOSING APPLICATIONS TO AMEND STATEMENTS OF CASE? TEN KEY POINTS AND A BONUS POINT ABOUT LISTS OF ISSUES
A blog about civil procedure has to have balance. The previous post considered applications to amend from the applicant’s perspective. Here we consider the position of those opposing an application. Litigators are as likely to be opposing an application as…
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … APPLICATIONS TO AMEND STATEMENTS OF CASE? TEN KEY POINTS FOR APPLICANTS (PLUS A “BONUS POINT” AND USEFUL LINKS…).)
The posts earlier this morning highlighted the major obstacles facing a litigant who wants to amend their pleadings at a very late stage. This is a good time to look at previous posts on amendments, together with links to the…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 98 : THE COURT REJECTS A LATE APPLICATION TO AMEND: THE CLAIMANT DID NOT HAVE A STRONG CASE
We have already look at this case in relation to the claimant’s application for relief from sanctions. The claimant was granted relief in relation to late service of the proposed amendments. However that did not, in fact, get the claimant…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 97 : CLAIMANT GIVEN LEAVE TO APPLY TO AMEND PLEADINGS THAT WERE SERVED LATE, BUT DIDN’T GET VERY FAR (OH, AND LEADING COUNSEL BEING ON HOLIDAY IS NOT A GOOD REASON FOR A BREACH…)
This is a case we are looking at in two parts. Firstly we are looking at the claimant’s application for relief from sanctions when it served amended Particulars of Claim outside the time period ordered by the court. A second…
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … THE “AUTHENTICITY” OF DOCUMENTS (OR OTHERWISE)? TEN KEY POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS CONSIDERING THE RISKS POSED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
The post earlier this morning where the Upper Tribunal considered the problems with very authentic looking documents being produced by Artificial Intelligence is illustrative of a very real problem for civil practitioners. The judgment contains a timely reminder that documents…
COSTS BITES 461: WINNING THE CASE BUT LOSING THE MAIN BATTLE MEANS CLAIMANT RECOVERS 85% OF COSTS: DEFENDANT CANNOT SEEK THE ADVANTAGES OF PART 36 WITHOUT MAKING A PART 36 OFFER
It is wise for a party that is likely to be on the losing side of a case to make a Part 36 offer. A court is unlikely to have much sympathy for a litigant that has failed to protect…
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … APPLYING TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE (2): A GUIDE FOR RESPONDENTS: 10 KEY POINTS WITH USEFUL LINKS
This post is (obviously) the mirror image to the earlier post on applying to rely on expert evidence. Here we look at guidance for those opposing an application to rely on expert evidence. Again there are links to posts that…
COST BITES 460: THE FACT THAT A DEFENDANT LOST ON A COUNTERCLAIM DID NOT PREVENT THE COURT FROM ORDERING THE CLAIMANT TO PAY 70% OF THEIR COSTS: ORDER UPHELD ON APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT
There are certain cases that litigators should keep in their cabinets to show to clients who are overkeen to litigate. This is one of them. The parties were arguing over a boundary line, with one of the issues being whether…
THE DISCLOSURE OF PART 36 OFFERS: IS THE DATE OF AN OFFER PART OF ITS “TERMS”? A QUESTION THAT HAS SOME PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES: THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE ISSUE
The rules allow the parties to disclose the existence of a Part 36 offer after a split trial. However the judge cannot be told the “terms” of the offer. Here the court considered the interesting (and important) issue of whether…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: 10 KEY POINTS ABOUT DRAFTING A DEFENCE AND THE POSTS THAT SHOW WHY THIS MATTERS
The post last Friday about the inadequate drafting of a defence was the 19th this year on the way in which defences are pleaded. This is a useful time to visit some basic principles in relation to how a defence…
DECODING THE DIRECTORIES: ALSO WHO ASSESSES THOSE WHO ASSESS US: CAN LAWYERS BITE BACK? A WHOLLY FICTIONAL EXAMPLE…
I first wrote about the “true meaning” of entries into directories eight years ago. Since they are in the news this week this is a good opportunity to remind people of what those phrases actually mean. However recent developments have…
THE CHANCERY DIVISION IS NO MORE: A PRACTICE NOTE FROM THE CHANCELLOR OF THE HIGH COURT
Today is the first day that we don’t have a Chancery Division. Here we look at a Practice Note that set out some practical changes. “Ah, cousin, cousin, it’s a weary word this Chancery!” — Charles Dickens, Bleak House, Chapter…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 96: WHEN YOU HAVE PLEADED AN INADEQUATE DEFENCE IT IS NOT A GOOD PLAN TO DEMAND THAT THE CLAIMANT PAY FOR ADEQUATE PARTICULARS TO BE PROVIDED…
Here is a classic case of a failure to draft a Defence properly. It contains a number of surprising elements. Firstly the defendant, having filed an inadequately particularised Defence, stated it would provide further particulars only if the claimant paid…
AI AND CIVIL JUSTICE: PREPARING FOR THE TSUNAMI – LORD BRIGGS ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL RULES AND THE HUMAN JUDGE
Issues relating to the use of AI continue to “interest” the legal profession. They also interest judges. Here I summarise Lord Briggs’ Keynote Address to the Oxford Civil Justice Systems in the 21st Century Conference. “… if human judges want…
ONLINE POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS: A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS
The post earlier this morning set out the major elements of the new Practice Direction on the Online Procedure Rules for Possession Proceedings. At the moment these have limited geographical scope. However it is likely that they will apply more…
ONLINE POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS: A NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION, COURT COMMUNICATIONS AND SOME IMPORTANT DEADLINES: CAME INTO FORCE ON THE 29th SEPTEMBER…
The Practice Direction: Online Procedure Rules for Possession Proceedings, updated on 29 September 2026 (and came into force at 12.00 that very day), introduces a procedural framework for specified County Court possession claims. It supplements the Online Procedure Rules 2026…
WHO IS A PARTY AFFECTED BY A SUMMARY JUDGMENT? THE CPR; CRYPTOCURRENCY; DELAY IN APPLYING AND THE MERITS OF THE CASE CONSIDERED IN A COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT TODAY
We are likely to see much litigation, and quite a few procedural wrangles, arising from Bitcoin and similar “currencies”. Here we have an interesting, and important, question under CPR 40.9. Firstly in relation to whether a party was “directly affected”…
INTERIM PAYMENTS: THE EXISTENCE OF DISPUTED DEFENCES AND COUNTERCLAIMS DID NOT PREVENT AN AWARD OF £1.4 MILLION
Lord Denning once observed of Cashflow that “It is the very lifeblood of the enterprise”. This remains the case for most modern businesses. In this respect an application for an interim payment can be a powerful tool. Sometimes essential to…
DOES AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT AMOUNT TO A “STEP IN THE ACTION” SO THAT AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS DISPLACED? AN IMPORTANT QUESTION CONSIDERED ON APPEAL
If the parties have agreed to an arbitration clause and one of them issues proceedings then the right to seek a stay of that action can be lost if the defendant takes a “step in the action”. This case considers…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: FOR WANT OF A PAGE IN A BUNDLE THE DAMAGES WERE LOWER… (SEPTEMBER 2015)
Here we look at a post from 2015 about a missing page in a trial bundle. The claimant argued that the missing page meant that damages had been too low. The judge held that that an application the day after…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 93 : CAN YOU CLAIM £2.569 MILLION IN DAMAGES WHEN YOU HAVEN’T PLEADED IT? NOW THAT’S AN IMPORTANT QUESTION…
If ever there was a case that would persuade you of the importance of pleadings it is this one. The claimant had succeeded on many issues at a trial. It now wanted to claim £2,569 million in damages. However an…
PROPORTIONALITY AND LITIGATION (2): WHERE DOES IT ALL START TO GO WRONG? (AND HOW DO YOU AVOID IT?)
This short series on proportionality is aimed, primarily, at protecting the client and the lawyer. A client may be exposed to excessive costs and the lawyers get blamed for this. There are (it is to be hoped) few cases where…
THE SRA CANNOT COMPEL A SOLICITOR TO DISCLOSE A CLIENT’S PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS: THE FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE OF LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE
This is an important case about legal professional privilege. The headline result is that the SRA have no power to override such privilege when carrying out an investigation. It also highlights the hurdles any party can face when seeking to…
PROPORTIONALITY IN LITIGATION (1): A TEN POINT GUIDE FOR CIVIL LITIGATORS: A REVIEW OF CASE LAW AND POSTS OVER THE PAST 13 YEARS
Yesterday we looked at a judgment in the Court of Appeal where the sum at stake was £25. The court was, shall we say, “sceptical” about whether this litigation was for the benefit of the actual client. For a while…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: THE NEED TO SERVE A SEALED CLAIM FORM: LITIGATORS HAVE BEEN COMING TO GRIEF ON THIS ISSUE FOR WELL OVER A DECADE (AT LEAST…)
Last week we looked at (another) case where a claimant had come to grief when it failed to serve a sealed claim form in time. This is an opportune time to remind readers of the basic point that to be…
COST BITES 454 : INTEREST ON COSTS: A SERIES OF CHECKLISTS AND USEFUL LINKS FOR THE PAYING PARTY
Last week we looked at a recent judgment which concerned interest on costs. That post also contained a series of checklists relating to interest on costs for the receiving party. I promised corresponding checklists for the paying party. There are…
A FITTING END TO THE BAYEUX THEMED WEEK: SHOULD FRANCE HAVE JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE? MORE ABOUT LAWYERS USING WITNESS STATEMENTS TO PUT FORWARD LEGAL ARGUMENTS (DO IT IF YOU WILL – BUT IT NEVER HELPS…)
Observant readers (and possibly the less observant ones) will have noticed that this week we have been paying homage to the arrival of the Bayeux Tapestry in the UK. It is fitting then that we end the week with a…
WHEN CHAT GPT DRAFTED A “SKELETON” ARGUMENT – 300 PAGES AND 132,000 WORDS LONG: THE LITIGANT RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE RULES
We have here another example, in a judgment today, of the difficulties caused by the use of AI. ChatGPT “helpfully” drafted a “skeleton” argument that was 300 pages long (the maximum page length allowed was 20 pages). This was coupled…
You must be logged in to post a comment.