Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Advertising Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham.
Browse: Home » Witness statements

“HIS WITNESS STATEMENT … CONTAINED A GREAT DEAL OF ANALYSIS, SUBMISSION AND COMMENTARY ON DOCUMENTS”

January 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Webinar, Witness statements

Because of the imminent changes in the rules in the Business and Property courts it is an opportune time to see how often the basic principles of witness evidence are not being observed. We see this in the judgment in YJB…

NEW RULES ON WITNESS STATEMENTS IN THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS FROM APRIL 2021: IN-HOUSE WEBINAR AVAILABLE

NEW RULES ON WITNESS STATEMENTS IN THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS FROM APRIL 2021: IN-HOUSE WEBINAR AVAILABLE

January 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Webinar, Witness statements

In April this year those practising in the Business and Property Courts will be subject to much more stringent requirements in relation to the preparation of witness statements relating to trial.  The lawyer conducting the case will have to sign…

WITNESS STATEMENTS: IMMINENT NEW RULES IN THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS

January 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Rule Changes, Witness statements

Last year we looked at the report of the Witness Evidence Working Group for the Business and Property Courts. This set out why changes were needed to the drafting of witness statements in those courts.   Some of the proposals in…

DIVIDING FACTS FROM COMMENTS AND SUBMISSIONS: WHY IT MATTERS AND HOW IT CAN HELP YOUR CASE

December 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The judgment is Scottow -v- Crown Prosecution Service [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin) is of interest for many reasons. This, however, is a blog about procedure.   It  is worthwhile looking at the comments that the Divisional Court made about the way…

PROVING THINGS 192: WHEN A WITNESS GIVES EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT TOOK PLACE 50 YEARS AGO: HOW THE JUDGE WEIGHS THE EVIDENCE

PROVING THINGS 192: WHEN A WITNESS GIVES EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT TOOK PLACE 50 YEARS AGO: HOW THE JUDGE WEIGHS THE EVIDENCE

December 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Personal Injury, Witness statements

In Pinnegar v Kellogg International Corporation & Anor [2020] EWHC 3431 (QB)  HHJ Platts (sitting as a High Court judge) considered the weight to be given to evidence of matters that had happened some 50 years previously.  It shows that…

WITNESS STATEMENTS THAT REQUIRE TRANSLATION OR WHERE THE MAKER IS NOT LITERATE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULES IS NOT SIMPLY A “TECHNICAL BREACH”

December 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

In Diamond v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 3313 Mr Justice Calver considered the weight to be attached to witness statements that did not comply with the Civil Procedure Rules.   The case shows why everyone should…

"SADLY, THIS IS AN ALL-TOO-COMMON FAILURE IN WITNESS STATMENTS PROVIDED IN CIVIL LITIGATION"

“SADLY, THIS IS AN ALL-TOO-COMMON FAILURE IN WITNESS STATMENTS PROVIDED IN CIVIL LITIGATION”

December 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

The comments of Mr Justice Murray today in Guest Supplies Intl Ltd v South Place Hotel Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3307 (QB) repeat what has been mentioned numerous times on this blog.   “It will perhaps be seen from…

CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON NEW WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED PART-WAY THROUGH A TRIAL: LATE WITNESSES COULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLUG GAPS

CLAIMANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON NEW WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED PART-WAY THROUGH A TRIAL: LATE WITNESSES COULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PLUG GAPS

November 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In  PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov & Ors [2020] EWHC 3250 (Comm) Mrs Justice Moulder refused the claimant’s application for permission to rely on new evidence which was served in the middle of a trial.  Not only is this a consideration…

MORE ON OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT LARGELY STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE

MORE ON OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT LARGELY STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE

November 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Witness statements

The judgment in Flaxby Park Ltd v Harrogate Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3204 (Admin) that was looked at yesterday referred to the earlier case of JD Wetherspoon plc v Harris [2013] 1 WLR 3296.  Since that decision pre-dated this blog. I thought it…

WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD "NOT MAKE POINTS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY A MATTER FOR LEGAL SUBMISSION OR ARGUMENT": HIGH COURT DECISION

WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD “NOT MAKE POINTS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY A MATTER FOR LEGAL SUBMISSION OR ARGUMENT”: HIGH COURT DECISION

November 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

In  Flaxby Park Ltd v Harrogate Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3204 (Admin) Mr Justice Holgate made some telling comments on witness statements.  Statements should not provide a commentary on documents or make points which are essentially legal submissions or argument. …

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND  CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

IF YOU WANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS – PUT THE DEFAULT RIGHT AT ONCE, AND CERTAINLY WELL BEFORE ANY APPLICATION FOR RELIEF: DEFENDANT FAILS ON APPEAL WHEN WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

November 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In the many posts I have written about seeking relief from sanctions one matter that has been stressed is the overwhelming importance of rectifying the breach immediately. The dangers of  not doing so are exemplified in the judgment of Mr…

PROVING THINGS 186: WHEN THE ONE WITNESS IN THE CASE HAD LITTLE KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THE FIGURES IN THE SCHEDULE HAD BEEN REACHED - THERE IS TROUBLE AHEAD...

PROVING THINGS 186: WHEN THE ONE WITNESS IN THE CASE HAD LITTLE KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THE FIGURES IN THE SCHEDULE HAD BEEN REACHED – THERE IS TROUBLE AHEAD…

November 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Witness statements

In Crazy Bear Group Ltd v Patel & Anor [2020] EWHC 3023 (Ch) Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Jones (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered whether defendants in an action had proven that they had suffered damages…

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

COURT REFUSES PARTY PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE

November 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In RGB Plastering Ltd v TAWE Drylining and Plastering Ltd [2020] EWHC 3028 (TCC)  HHJ Jarman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) refused the defendant permission to rely on a witness statement that was served late. “Ms…

WITNESS STATEMENTS COULD BE DISCLOSED IF MENTIONED IN OPEN COURT: DEPP, THE UNCALLED WITNESSES AND THE MEDIA

WITNESS STATEMENTS COULD BE DISCLOSED IF MENTIONED IN OPEN COURT: DEPP, THE UNCALLED WITNESSES AND THE MEDIA

November 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

There are many aspects of the judgment in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) that have gained wide media attention.  Here I want to look at two issues in relation to the failure…

"A MARKED 'DISCONNECT' BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT'S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY": ANOTHER "ARGUMENTATIVE" WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

“A MARKED ‘DISCONNECT’ BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT’S WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND HIS ORAL TESTIMONY”: ANOTHER “ARGUMENTATIVE” WITNESS STATEMENT BITES THE DUST

November 5, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements

The judgment of ICC Judge Barber in Leopard v Robinson [2020] EWHC 2928 (Ch) provides another example of a written witness statement being misused. The judge held that the statement consisted of “assertions and legal submissions”. These have no place…

THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING EVIDENCE EARLY:  "I DON'T REMEMBER NOW & I WON'T REMEMBER ANYTHING IF I COME TO COURT"

THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING EVIDENCE EARLY: “I DON’T REMEMBER NOW & I WON’T REMEMBER ANYTHING IF I COME TO COURT”

October 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Witness statements

The observations of Mr Justice Nicklin in Rayner v Seabourne-Hawkins [2020] EWHC 2895 (QB) highlight the importance of gathering evidence promptly.  It also contains the text of a highly perceptive letter from a prospective witness that, in many ways, highlights…

SERVE WITNESS STATEMENTS LATE AT YOUR PERIL: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NECESSARY AND LATE SERVICE IS NEARLY ALWAYS A SERIOUS BREACH

October 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

There are many interesting aspects of the judgment of HHJ Mithani QC in Patel & Anor v Barlows Solicitors (a firm) & Ors [2020] EWHC 2753 (Ch). Here I want to look at the part of the judgment that considers…

PROVING THINGS 184: PROVING YOU CAN'T A CLAIM WILL BE "STIFLED"  REQUIRES A DETAILED EXPLANATION

PROVING THINGS 184: PROVING YOU CAN’T A CLAIM WILL BE “STIFLED” REQUIRES A DETAILED EXPLANATION

October 26, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Setting aside judgment

In National Tourism Council of Qatar v Mehdiyev [2020] EWHC 2638 (Ch) Deputy Master Hansen considered the defendant’s evidence as to means when deciding whether or not to impose terms when setting aside a judgment.  It is important to note…

LIFE IN LAW ISN'T ALWAYS GLAMOROUS:  A CLIENT CAN BLAME THEIR LAWYER (OR FORMER LAWYER) FOR THEIR WITNESS STATEMENT

LIFE IN LAW ISN’T ALWAYS GLAMOROUS: A CLIENT CAN BLAME THEIR LAWYER (OR FORMER LAWYER) FOR THEIR WITNESS STATEMENT

October 19, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fundamental Dishonesty, Witness statements

A classic example of a client seeking to blame their lawyer for the contents of a witness statement can be seen in the judgment in  Simpson v Payne, reported in the PI Brief Update Law Journal.   THE CASE The claimant…

A CAREFUL APPROACH IS NEEDED TO THE GATHERING OF EVIDENCE AND THE SIGNING OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: A LOCAL AUTHORITY FALLS WELL SHORT OF THE MARK

A CAREFUL APPROACH IS NEEDED TO THE GATHERING OF EVIDENCE AND THE SIGNING OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: A LOCAL AUTHORITY FALLS WELL SHORT OF THE MARK

October 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Statements of Truth, Witness statements

It is unusual for this blog to cover family cases, particularly decisions made some three years ago.  However the judgment of HHJ Corbett in E (A Child : Care proceedings : Costs) [2017] EWFC 118 has recently been published on…

1 2 … 14 Next →

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2021. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
In-House Webinar

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22,677 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • PROVING THINGS 203: EVIDENCE AND SCOTT SCHEDULES IN COERCIVE CONTROL CASES: SCOTT SCHEDULES “INEFFECTIVE AND FREQUENTLY UNSUITABLE”
  • ANOTHER WITNESS STATEMENT THAT STRAYED INTO INADMISSIBLE ARGUMENTS, PROTRACTED COMMENTARY AND EXPERT EVIDENCE
  • CLAIMANTS SUED THE WRONG (NON-EXISTENT) DEFENDANT – AND THE LIMITATION PERIOD HAD EXPIRED: DON’T START BREAKING THE CROCKERY JUST YET
  • PROVING THINGS 201: THE WHITE LION HOTEL CASE AND PROVING BREACH OF DUTY BY AN OCCUPIER
  • LAWFULNESS OF DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

Top Posts & Pages

  • CLAIMANTS SUED THE WRONG (NON-EXISTENT) DEFENDANT - AND THE LIMITATION PERIOD HAD EXPIRED: DON'T START BREAKING THE CROCKERY JUST YET
  • ANOTHER WITNESS STATEMENT THAT STRAYED INTO INADMISSIBLE ARGUMENTS, PROTRACTED COMMENTARY AND EXPERT EVIDENCE
  • PROVING THINGS 203: EVIDENCE AND SCOTT SCHEDULES IN COERCIVE CONTROL CASES: SCOTT SCHEDULES "INEFFECTIVE AND FREQUENTLY UNSUITABLE"
  • PROVING THINGS 201: THE WHITE LION HOTEL CASE AND PROVING BREACH OF DUTY BY AN OCCUPIER
  • LAWFULNESS OF DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 14th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Hardwicke
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • www.Bailii.org

Archives

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies.
To find out more, as well as how to remove or block these, see here: Our Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2021 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by WordPress and Origin