Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Advertising Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » 2013 » November » 01

NEW GUIDE TO CHANCERY PROCEDURE: "COMMON LAWYERS" DON'T SWITCH OFF

November 1, 2013 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure

HM Courts and Tribunal Service has provided a new Chancery Guide. It is available at http://www.chba.org.uk/for-members/library/practice-directions-court-notices/chancery-guide-updated-october-2013 It is worthwhile reading for non-Chancery lawyers.  The book contains invaluable advice about disclosure, preparing for hearings, statements of case and witness statements. It is…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND CPR 3.9: TWO CASES WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WAS GRANTED

November 1, 2013 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

The issues caused by the new CPR 3.9 have featured many times on this blog.   Here we look at two High Court decisions where relief from sanctions was granted.  Kesabo –v- African Barrick Gold Plc and (because the full transcript…

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2022. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 26,208 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • PAYING PARTY REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON LATE POINTS OF DISPUTE IN ASSESSMENT: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL
  • JUDGE REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION ON THE BASIS OF “ILLEGALITY”: THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT CAPABLE OF COMMITTING “CRIMINAL” ACTS
  • THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010 AND THE DATE OF “ACTIONABLE DAMAGE”: COURT REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT THE CLAIMANT’S CASE
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THE WITNESS CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH: “IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HE IN FACT SIGNED THE STATEMENT”
  • PROVING THINGS 233: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AFTER 14 YEARS: THE CRUEL CONCEPT OF CAUSATION IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

Top Posts & Pages

  • THE DANGER (FOR CLAIMANTS) OF LEAVING PART 36 OFFERS OPEN: CLAIM £125,000, GET £950
  • WITNESS DEMEANOUR: NOT THAT IMPORTANT (INDEED PROBABLY UNIMPORTANT): COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
  • JUDGE REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION ON THE BASIS OF "ILLEGALITY": THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT CAPABLE OF COMMITTING "CRIMINAL" ACTS
  • THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010 AND THE DATE OF "ACTIONABLE DAMAGE": COURT REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT THE CLAIMANT'S CASE
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THE WITNESS CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH: "IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HE IN FACT SIGNED THE STATEMENT"

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 14th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • Website of 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, Catastrophic Injury Group
  • www.Bailii.org

Archives

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2022 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by WordPress and Origin