THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 89: AN APPELLANT CANNOT PURSUE AN UNPLEADED “NEW, NEW CASE”: APPEAL IN CASE AGAINST SOLICITORS WAS “WASTEFUL OF TIME AND RESOURCES”
This is a case that started off as a consideration of the way in which a defendant firm of solicitors adduced evidence to support assertions that there was a history of fraud in motor accident claims. The appellants here, the…
“ALL DOCUMENTS HAD AT LEAST TWO NUMBERS AND TECHNICALLY 3 IN SOME CASES”: A SMALL POINT ABOUT BUNDLES AND NUMBERING
For several years a post on bundles and “Sedley’s Laws” was the most read post on this site. Ever since then the preparation, presentation and numbering of bundles for applications and trials have formed a regular part of the material…
PROVING THINGS 295: HOW MUCH SHOULD A CARER BE PAID? INTERESTING READING FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AMONG OTHERS…)
This is a case about the costs of providing care. It is unusual in that it does not arise in the context of a claim for damages for personal injury or clinical negligence. Nevertheless there are issues of general relevance…
LIMITATION AND SEXUAL ABUSE CLAIMS: THE LAW CHANGED AFTER EVIDENCE AND SUBMISSIONS BUT BEFORE JUDGMENT: THE AMENDED ACT APPLIES
We have looked before at how the new sections 11ZA and 11ZB into the Limitation Act 1980 have already been considered by the courts. Here was have another example. The new provisions were held to apply in a case where…
THE DANGERS OF SUING A DISSOLVED COMPANY WHICH HAS BEEN RESTORED TO THE REGISTER: COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND THE PERIOD OF DISSOLUTION
Here we have an important judgement pointing out that, in effect, the limitation period starts running again once a company is restored to the register. The court cannot grant an order under the Companies Act which extends limitation beyond the…
EXPERT WATCH 68: THE MISUSE OF AI: “CREATE ME AN EXCEPTIONAL EXPERT WITNESS REPORT”: SHOW HOW MY CLIENT “IS 0% AT FAULT”: THIS WITNESS HAD A FEW PROBLEMS…
“What happens in America eventually happens over here” is a well known maxim. It is for that reason we are looking at a case about expert evidence and the use of artificial intelligence from the United States. (To be frank…
APPELLANT HAS £2.8 MILLION APPEAL STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: THE DANGERS OF INACTIVITY: “THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES CANNOT DETERMINE THE OUTCOME”
Here we see case where an appellant lost the chance to pursue an appeal worth £2.8 million primarily because of a failure to appoint new representatives or inform the Tribunal of details of how he could be contacted. Inactivity led…
EXPERT WATCH 67: LITIGANTS NOT ALLOWED TO RECOVER THE COSTS OF AN EXPERT WHOSE EVIDENCE ON SOME ISSUES WAS “LARGELY UNHELPFUL”
It is rare to be able to see a costs decision on the recoverability of the costs of expert evidence. We have such a case here where the Competition Appeal Tribunal considered whether to allow a successful party to recover…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: YOU CANNOT NECESSARILY RELY ON INTERLOCUTORY WITNESS STATEMENTS AT TRIAL
Here we have a case where the claimant, wrongfully, believed that she could rely on witness statements that had been served in the course of the proceedings in addition to the statement served for trial. She was given permission to…
COST BITES 442: AN IMPORTANT POINT TO WATCH WHEN SEEKING TO RECOVER COSTS ON A COUNTERCLAIM
Here we look at an important point in relation to the costs of a counterclaim. If a party is awarded the costs of the counterclaim those costs may be very narrowly confined. In this case the defendant attempted to recover…
COST BITES 441: NO ORDER FOR COSTS – EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICANT WAS SUCCESSFUL: THERE ARE MANY LESSONS TO LEARN HERE…
Last week this blog had a fairly detailed review of those circumstances which often lead to no order for costs being made. We have another example here. The applicant had succeeded in the application it had made, however the judge…
COST BITES 440: WHY INDEMNITY COSTS WERE ORDERED A LOOK AT THE CLAIMANTS’ PLEADED CASE: FIRSTLY IT WAS PLEADED TOO WIDELY, SECONDLY THERE WERE THEN ATTEMPTS TO PUT THE CASE OUTSIDE THE PLEADINGS
We look again at the award of indemnity costs in the Associated Newspaper case. The reasons for this were manifold. However there were two important factors relating to the statements of case. Firstly the case was pleaded far too widely;…
CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF WEBINARS COMING UP LATER THIS YEAR: A NEW DISCOUNT CODE
CLB members have a discount to a series of webinars on damages that start in September. The series is intended to provide practical guidance for practitioners dealing with claims of every size, from straightforward road traffic accidents to catastrophic injury litigation….
COST BITES 439 : IS THE EXISTENCE OF A COSTS BUDGET A REASON NOT TO AWARD INDEMNITY COSTS ?
It is rare for an order about indemnity costs to make the headlines of the national press and media. We are looking at a case which has had a major amount of publicity, not least because of the celebrity status…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE RELEVANCE OF THE CLIENTS BEING SOLELY AT FAULT: SOME DIFFICULT ISSUES TO TACKLE
In many cases relating to breach from sanctions the fault may lie with the solicitor rather than the client. This case considers that question directly. The clients’ innocence was an important factor in the court’s discretion. “I take from the…
COST BITES 438 : CLAIMANT’S UNTENABLE ARGUMENTS LEADS TO REDUCTION IN COSTS RECOVERED: HOURLY RATES FAR TOO HIGH, EVEN WHEN THE CLAIM WAS “ONLY” FOR £9 MILLION
This decision as to costs gives rise to two interesting issues. Firstly the claimant’s costs of an injunction application were reduced substantially because assertions were put forward on a basis that were “unsustainable” and which should never have been pursued,…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION AN 8 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE (AUGUST 2019): AND LOOK AT THE LINKS…
This week we go back to August 2019 with a simple (but I hope effective) post on avoiding negligence claims in civil litigation. Eight of the major problem areas were identified and succinct solutions offered. (There have been hundreds of…
EXPERT WATCH 66: RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN “HONOURED IN THE BREACH”; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY’S CASE
This short series is looking at how you can spot “red flags” when looking at an expert report. There are often aspects of reports that “don’t fare well” when put under scrutiny at trial. “His response was that he usually…
EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY “WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT” TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG
This judgment is critical of the way in which an expert report was prepared. The problems were manifold in relation to the way in which the information was obtained, the way it was presented and the failure to consider primary…
ANOTHER INTERESTING DISCUSSION (ABOUT INTEREST…): THE STARTING POINT IS THAT THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO BE COMPENSATED FOR BEING OUT OF ITS MONEY (NO MATTER WHAT IT WOULD HAVE DONE WITH IT…)
Here is a relatively short judgment on an important point – if the purpose of interest is compensatory what is the position if a claimant would never have earned interest on the money in any event? As we shall see…
WHEN A COURT MAY MAKE NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE FACTORS CONSIDERED: 12 KEY POINTS AND A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS
Some posts earlier this week concentrated on a case where the judge made no order for costs. This is an unusual outcome, but still one that has to be considered and the client warned about. Here we take a…
COST BITES 437: SHOULD THE DEFENDANT’S CONDUCT OF THE ACTION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS BEING AWARDED? YES IT SHOULD…
In this case the judge decided that the defendant’s conduct of the litigation warranted an award of indemnity costs being made. There is an interesting consideration of the case law relating to when costs will be reduced because of lack…
INTEREST ON DAMAGES: (1) GENERALLY; (2) AFTER THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO BEAT A PART 36 OFFER: THERE IS NO NEED TO FIND DISHONESTY OR SERIOUS CONDUCT TO AWARD ENHANCED INTEREST
There are two issues of interest in this case. Firstly the judge’s decision on the appropriate rate for interest on damages generally. Secondly the judge’s observations that there is no need for the court to find misconduct to award enhanced…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: RED FLAGS AND WITNESS STATEMENTS (1): THE WITNESS THAT GIVES THE COURT THEIR OPINION
We have below a series of posts about the dangers of putting “opinion” evidence into witness statements. It has been a constant theme on this site for, at least, 12 years. There is no sign of this abating. Attempts have…
A WIDOW CANNOT BRING AN ACTION UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT WHERE HER HUSBAND SETTLED THE PERSONAL INJURY ACTION AGAINST A CONCURRENT TORTFEASOR IN HIS LIFETIME
This case emphasises a long existing principle that a second action cannot be brought if a claimant, now deceased, has settled proceedings in their lifetime. This principle extends to concurrent tortfeasors. There are also important observations outside the realm of…
COST BITES 436: THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFER: WAS IT UNJUST FOR THE USUAL CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY? THE IMPORTANCE OF INTEREST
Here we look at a judgment where the court considered an argument that the claimant had not beaten its own Part 36 offer. The judge held that the defendant’s argument fell at the first post because it failed to take…
COST BITES 435: ANOTHER APPLICATION TO REVISE A COSTS BUDGET (DURING A TRIAL): WITH A DIFFERENT RESULT: SOME INTERESTING COMMENTS ON CONDUCT ALONG THE WAY…
We have had a number of cases relating to amending costs budgets recently. This one has a different result. The need to revise the budget arose from the judge’s decision that there should be a separate hearing on damages. This,…
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: LITIGATORS HAVE TO WARN THEIR CLIENTS THAT SOMETIMES A COURT MAKES NO ORDER FOR COSTS AT ALL: THE PERILS IF YOU DON’T
This post obviously follows on from the post earlier today where the judge made no award for costs after a trial. Neither side had “won” and, in any event, the amount spent in pursuit of the claim was disproportional. This…
COST BITES 434 : JUDGE REFUSES TO INCREASE CLAIMANT’S BUDGET AFTER TRIAL, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT OPPOSED BY THE DEFENDANT: A PARTY MADE NO ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHY IT NEEDED TO SPEND THE PRICE OF THE AVERAGE UK HOUSE ON ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE
We are looking at another attempt to vary a costs budget. In this case the attempt was made after the trial and after judgment. Both parties, initially, sought large variations. Only the claimant proceeded with the application in relation to…
COST BITES 435: £4 MILLION SPENT IN COSTS AND NEITHER PARTY WILL RECOVER A PENNY FROM THE OTHER: A “PYRHHIC” VICTORY LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS…
This is case that should be considered by every litigator, and litigant. It involves legal expenditure on a major scale, with very little benefit to the parties at the end. The final result is unlikely to please either of the…
GIVING AN UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES WHEN OBTAINING AN INJUNCTION: REMEMBER IT CAN COME BACK TO BITE (AND SOMETIMES BITE HARD…)
When a party obtains an injunction they, usually, have to give an undertaking as to damages. There are now a number of cases where litigants have been found liable to pay damages as a result of that undertaking. We have…
CAN DELAY IN APPLYING TO STRIKE OUT AN ACTION FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS BE AN ABUSE OF PROCESS IN ITSELF? THE DANGERS OF LETTING TIME GO BY
Here we have a case where it was argued that the defendant’s delay in bringing an application to strike out for abuse of process was an abuse of process in itself. The case points to authorities that “acquiescing” in an…
THROWBACK FRIDAY: SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES: AN OVERVIEW AND THE RELEVANT GUIDANCE CONSIDERED (AUGUST 2020)
Man of the posts in August 2020 concerned the impact of Covid. This post is the exception. It arose out of a Court of Appeal decision that month that reviewed the principles relating to similar fact evidence in civil cases….
AN ORDER FOR WASTED COSTS NARROWLY AVERTED – BUT THERE WERE ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES: “NONE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN THIS CASE HAVE COVERED THEMSELVES WITH GLORY”
This is a case where the judge found the conduct of a firm of solicitors “utterly extraordinary”. However there were, in fact, a number of errors by both sides. This may (and probably would) have led to a wasted costs…
ATTEMPTS TO “REVISIT” THE PRELIMINARY ISSUES REFUSED: ALSO THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO SEE WITNESS STATEMENTS NOT JUST DOCUMENTS…
This is another case where a party attempts to “revisit” preliminary issues/a statement of issues that have been agreed and approved by the court. That application did not get very far. Further the judge observed that, although the parties were…
ADVOCACY THE JUDGE’S VIEW A RECAP OF THE SERIES 3: “THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE”: WHY ALL LITIGATORS SHOULD KNOW THESE THINGS…
Back in the dim and distant days of 2018 this site ran its third series on “Advocacy: the Judge’s View”. A new series will start shortly. However before that we are “recapping” on the guidance given in the four previous…
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS: AN APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY “BARE ASSERTION”
The need to provide evidence and not simply make bare assertions is as important in applications as at trial. Here we see a case where the claimant obtained summary judgment in the face of a “paucity of evidence” from the…
COST BITES 433: WHAT ARE “SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS” WHEN YOU WANT TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET? WHY THERE WERE NO SUCH DEVELOPMENTS HERE
We are continuing our consideration at the appeal case where the defendant’s appeal against a decision to vary the claimant’s budget. The first reason the appeal was successful was because the first instance judge found that there were no “significant…
COST BITES 432: THE COURT CANNOT ALTER THE COSTS BUDGET UNLESS THERE ARE “SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS” : HIGH COURT DECISION
This case reiterates the essential point that the court has no freestanding discretion to vary a costs budget. An essential prerequisite of variation is that there must be a “significant development” that warrants a variation. There was no such development…
COST BITES 431: A CASE WHERE BOTH SIDES NEEDED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS SO THAT THEY COULD ARGUE ISSUES OF COSTS: THE PROBLEMS FLOCK TOGETHER…
Here we look at a case where both parties required an extension of time in order to raise very significant arguments in relation to costs. The claimant had been late in filing essential documents for his own costs protection, the…
SERVICE POINTS 53: HOW DOES THE COURT PROTECT THE POSITION OF A PARTY WHO WANTS TO APPEAL DECISION IN RELATION TO JURISDICTION BUT RISKS “ACCEPTING” JURISDICTION IN THE MEANTIME? A PUZZLE SOLVED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
This judgment highlights the risk that a party who wishes to dispute jurisdiction can accidentally accept it. What, if any, steps should the courts take to protect an appellant in these circumstances. The litigant may wish to appeal to a…
SHOULD AN ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES GO AHEAD PENDING AN APPEAL? £8 MILLION COSTS COULD HELP AVOID £45 MILLION: THE TRIAL COULD MATERIALLY ADVANCE THE LITIGATION AND NARROW FUTURE DISPUTES
Here the court considered whether an assessment of damages should be stayed pending the claimants’ application for permission to appeal. This raised issues in relation to costs management and proportionality. The judge engaged in an exercise of looking at the…
FAILING TO GIVE THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: THE JUDGE MAY THINK THAT THERE IS SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON HERE…
There is, it appears, no end to the number of cases in which non-compliant witness statements are served. We have another example here. One major issue relates to the failure to give the source of information and belief for the…
CLAIMANT’S SUCCESSFUL APPEAL AGAINST THE STRIKING OUT OF A CASE BECAUSE A WITNESS STATEMENT HAD NOT BEEN PROVIDED: THE SMALL CLAIMS PROTOCOL IS (VERY) DIFFERENT…
I am grateful to barrister Simon Murray for sending me a copy of this decision that deals with some important procedural issues on the Small Claims Track. In particular it highlights the fact that witness statements are not mandatory on…
COST BITES 430 : THE ARMED FORCES HEARING LOSS LITIGATION? WHO WON AND WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS?
The issue of “who won” in litigation is usually a relatively easy one. Here we have a judgment in a complex series of test cases where the parties disagreed who had been successful. There was a major difference in views….
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: THE 70 KEY POINTS OF THE DENTON JUDGMENT: REVISITING THE BASICS AFTER TWELVE YEARS…
It is now twelve years since the judgment in Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. However it is still a judgment that appears regularly in the reports (we will be looking at such a case this week). Over the years…
COST BITES 429: A REMINDER THAT A CLAIMANT IS STILL LIABLE TO PAY COSTS EVEN IF PROCEEDINGS ARE NEVER SERVED: SOMETHING ABOUT PRE-ACTION CONDUCT TOO…
This judgment illustrates two important things. Firstly that a claimant’s liability to pay costs starts upon issue and remains even if proceedings are never served. Secondly that pre-action conduct can have an impact on the decision that a judge makes…
SETTING ASIDE A JUDGMENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD: WHAT IF ONE OF THE PARTIES WAS INNOCENT? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE: SOMETHING ABOUT LACHES TOO…
Setting aside a judgment obtained by fraud is very different to other applications to set aside. It requires a separate action and there is a high burden of proof. However what should happen if one of the parties to the…
ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 5: AN APPLICATION FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY PAID TO ENFORCEMENT AGENT DISMISSED: IT WAS TOO LATE AND MISCONCEIVED IN ANY EVENT
There are several issues in the case of general importance, particularly for those seeking to challenge Enforcement Agents. Firstly as to the strict timetable involved; secondly as to what constitutes “controlled goods” and finally as to the appropriate means for…
A MYRIAD OF PROCEDURAL ISSUES A BANKRUPT CLAIMANT; AN APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM AN ADMISSION AND AN ATTEMPT TO STRIKE OUT A COUNTERCLAIM FOR “WAREHOUSING”
This is a case that bristles with procedural issues. Firstly as to what happens when a claimant, involved in a partnership with others, goes bankrupt. Secondly whether that litigant could withdraw an admission that he had not status. Thirdly whether…
You must be logged in to post a comment.