Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • My Account
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.

THE GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES: SEE THEM HERE: UPDATED FOR 2025 RATES

THE GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES: SEE THEM HERE: UPDATED FOR 2025 RATES

April 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The Guideline Hourly Rates changed on 1st January 2025. These are set out below.  The 2024 rates can be found underneath. Guideline hourly rates 2025 Grade Fee earner London 1 London 2 London 3 National 1 National 2 A Solicitors…

SANCTIONS: CASE WATCH

SANCTIONS: CASE WATCH

December 12, 2013 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

This section  looks at decisions in relation to relief from sanctions and the general principles of CPR 3.9. Often there are links to the decisions themselves, together with links to posts on this blog. CASES IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER DECEMBER 2024…

HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR'S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL

HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR’S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

Many, if not all, litigators will be familiar with the scenario whereby an estimate of costs is given and events develop so that the estimate is overtaken.  This scenario was considered in the case we are considering today.   An estimate…

SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Here we are looking at a case where a party, dissatisfied with the approach of a jointly instructed expert, applied to the court for permission to instruct their own expert. The judgment contains a useful summary of the relevant principles….

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD "SOMEONE HERE" MUST BE TO BLAME

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out, Summary judgment

We are looking at a case where the court struck out the claimant’s case against three defendants because of the inadequate way in which the case was pleaded.  General assertions that someone here must be to blame were not sufficient.  The…

BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE - MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER

BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER

June 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure

On the 10th June 2025* this site is becoming a membership site. All the past posts, and the vast majority of future posts will only be available to members who have joined.  This post explains what readers need to do…

SAD NEWS: THE DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE BRANCHFLOWER

SAD NEWS: THE DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE BRANCHFLOWER

June 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure

I was saddened to learn yesterday of the death of District Judge George Branchflower.   This is a sad loss to his family, his friends and the legal profession.   GEORGE’S ROUTE TO THE BAR George had an unusual route to…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 4: THE COURT'S REVIEW OF CASES WHERE AI HAD CAUSED TROUBLE - AT HOME AND ABROAD

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 4: THE COURT’S REVIEW OF CASES WHERE AI HAD CAUSED TROUBLE – AT HOME AND ABROAD

June 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

The use of AI which cites “false” cases is extremely worrying. It is clear that this is a widespread issue. In an appendix to the judgment the Divisional Court reviewed the cases, including many from foreign jurisdictions, where AI had…

UNDERSTANDING THE LAW AS TO FATAL ACCIDENTS 2025: WEBINAR 11th JUNE 2025

UNDERSTANDING THE LAW AS TO FATAL ACCIDENTS 2025: WEBINAR 11th JUNE 2025

June 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Damages, Fatal Accidents, Webinar

Part of a series on fatal accident litigation this webinar takes you through the essential elements you have to consider before you can advise whether a claim for fatal accident damages can be brought. Booking details available here   WHAT THE…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT...

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT…

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We are returning to (and not for the last time) to the Divisional Court judgment in relation to the citation of false authorities due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. The Court reviews the dangers, the guidance and the sanctions…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content

We are continuing with the examination of the Court’s judgment in relation to cases where false authorities have been cited as a result of a reliance on false authorities, generated by artificial intelligence.   Here we have a case where the…

CITING "FALSE" CASES TO THE COURT 1:  JUDGMENT  ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE

CITING “FALSE” CASES TO THE COURT 1: JUDGMENT ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content

This blog has already considered the case of Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1040 (Admin) on several occasions. False (presumably AI generated) authorities were put before the court.  That case,…

"THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE TRIAL IS NOT A REHEARSAL": THE DIFFICULTIES A CLAIMANT HAS IN A CLAIM UNDER THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010

“THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE TRIAL IS NOT A REHEARSAL”: THE DIFFICULTIES A CLAIMANT HAS IN A CLAIM UNDER THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a case where the claimant suggested that a preliminary issue trial be adjourned.  The court was firm in its rejection of that suggestion.  The judge stated that the trial “is not a rehearsal” and that if…

PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB

PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

This series may well be misnamed. A more apt description may well be “not proving things”.  That is what we are considering in looking at the case today.  There was a lengthy trial with a substantial claim for damages. The…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS "NOT PURSUED"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought.  Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…

FOUR PART 36 WEBINARS - ALL AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE: WHAT A TREAT - POTENTIALLY A WHOLE NIGHT'S VIEWING...

FOUR PART 36 WEBINARS – ALL AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE: WHAT A TREAT – POTENTIALLY A WHOLE NIGHT’S VIEWING…

June 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36, Webinar

The webinar on Part 36 that  I broadcast earlier this week is now available on YouTube and can be found here.  Links to previous webinars on Part 36 can be found below.   MATTERS COVERED IN THE 2025 WEBINAR This…

WRITING TO THE JUDGE AFTER THE DRAFT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN SENT OUT: THIS IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADVANCE FURTHER ARGUMENT

WRITING TO THE JUDGE AFTER THE DRAFT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN SENT OUT: THIS IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADVANCE FURTHER ARGUMENT

June 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

There have been a large number of cases where the courts have been critical of attempt to “re-open” judgments at the stage where the draft judgment is circulated.  We see another example here. The judge reviewed the cases on this…

PARTS OF WITNESS STATEMENT STRUCK OUT - THIS "CARRIES NO WEIGHT AS EVIDENCE":DOORS FIRMLY SHUT IN RELATION TO INADMISSIBLE COMMENTARY

PARTS OF WITNESS STATEMENT STRUCK OUT – THIS “CARRIES NO WEIGHT AS EVIDENCE”:DOORS FIRMLY SHUT IN RELATION TO INADMISSIBLE COMMENTARY

June 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

If we had a pound for every word in witness statements served in just one single month that was irrelevant or inadmissible we could probably go a long way to paying off the national debt.  The costs, however, are probably…

FATAL ACCIDENT LAW AND PRACTICE: SEVEN WEBINARS TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND LAW, PROCEDURE AND PRACTICE

FATAL ACCIDENT LAW AND PRACTICE: SEVEN WEBINARS TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND LAW, PROCEDURE AND PRACTICE

June 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Courses, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Webinar

Fatal accidents claims are often some of the most challenging areas for the litigator.  Claims have to be investigated (and defended) with great care and sensitivity.  To add to the difficulties the law relating to damages is almost wholly based…

THE CLAIMANT DID NOT NEED TO ANSWER THE PART 18 REQUESTS MADE: THESE REQUESTS ARE AKIN TO THE "PRE CPR-PROCEDURE"

THE CLAIMANT DID NOT NEED TO ANSWER THE PART 18 REQUESTS MADE: THESE REQUESTS ARE AKIN TO THE “PRE CPR-PROCEDURE”

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Statements of Case

There have been a number of cases recently relating to Part 18 questions and questions to experts.   Here we are looking at a case where the defendant raised numerous requests to the claimant and sought a peremptory order when it…

PART 35 QUESTIONS TO EXPERTS A POINT ABOUT THE CASE LAW: HOW FAR CAN THE QUESTIONS GO? A CLOSE LOOK AT THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN MUTCH

PART 35 QUESTIONS TO EXPERTS A POINT ABOUT THE CASE LAW: HOW FAR CAN THE QUESTIONS GO? A CLOSE LOOK AT THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN MUTCH

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

The previous post about when experts should be called to give evidence also contained a consideration of the nature of questions that can be put to experts.  One of my colleagues has suggested that the summary relating to the questioning…

WHEN SHOULD PARTIES BE ALLOWED TO CALL EXPERT WITNESSES TO GIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED (IN THE FAMILY COURT)

WHEN SHOULD PARTIES BE ALLOWED TO CALL EXPERT WITNESSES TO GIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED (IN THE FAMILY COURT)

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

When should the courts permit experts to give evidence at trial?  There are few cases on this topic and today we are looking at a decision in the family courts. The case is relevant to civil practitioners in that it…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 103: THE STANDARD FORM FOR PART 36 OFFERS

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 103: THE STANDARD FORM FOR PART 36 OFFERS

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

Yesterday I gave a webinar about Part 36, this will shortly be available on YouTube.  The webinar reviews cases over the past 12 months. One of the points being considered was the arguments in Henderson & Jones Ltd v Salica Investments…

COST BITES 243: EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL DID NOT ERR WHEN IT ORDERED THE APPLICANT TO PAY (UP TO) £210,000 IN COSTS

COST BITES 243: EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL DID NOT ERR WHEN IT ORDERED THE APPLICANT TO PAY (UP TO) £210,000 IN COSTS

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

It is important for all litigators and litigants to know that some regimes, although normally costs free, do have a discretion to award costs.  The Employment Tribunal is an example of this.   In this case the Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld…

WITNESS STATEMENTS, FORGED DOCUMENTS AND A FINDING OF CONTEMPT OF COURT: A WHOLE BUNCH OF PROBLEMS

WITNESS STATEMENTS, FORGED DOCUMENTS AND A FINDING OF CONTEMPT OF COURT: A WHOLE BUNCH OF PROBLEMS

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Committal proceedings, Members Content, Personal Injury

This is a case where the judge found that the claimant and a witness relied on documents that they knew to be forged. It is an important reminder of the lengths that some people can go to in litigation.  It…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Personal Injury

The issues of an occupier’s duty in relation to those walking along unadopted highways are always complex.  Here we look at a case where the claimant was successful in establishing a breach of duty following an injury she sustained when…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 14: THE DEFENDANT COULD GIVE EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT WERE NOT PLEADED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 14: THE DEFENDANT COULD GIVE EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT WERE NOT PLEADED

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

Today we are looking at a case where the judge rejected an argument that evidence could not be given because the particular issue had not been pleaded.  The judge held that, on the facts of this case, the evidence was…

Interest rate reductions on the Court Funds Office special and basic accounts: 30 May 2025

Interest rate reductions on the Court Funds Office special and basic accounts: 30 May 2025

June 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Interest, Members Content

The Ministry of Justice announced on the 30th May 2025 that there is to be a reduction in the interest rates paid on funds in the Court Funds Office. Photo by micheile henderson on Unsplash THE ANNOUNCEMENT The announcement can be found here. “In…

DOES EVERY DOG DESERVE ONE BITE? LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS - RECENT CASES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 6th JUNE 2025

DOES EVERY DOG DESERVE ONE BITE? LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS – RECENT CASES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 6th JUNE 2025

June 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Liability, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

It is difficult to find anyone who has a good word to say about Section 2 of  the Animals Act, this webinar looks at recent cases relating to liability for animals and the practical steps litigators can take when considering…

COST BITES 242: THE WORDING OF THE RETAINER DID NOT ENABLE THE SOLICITOR TO RENDER INTERIM STATUTE BILLS: THE BILLS HAD INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN ANY EVENT

COST BITES 242: THE WORDING OF THE RETAINER DID NOT ENABLE THE SOLICITOR TO RENDER INTERIM STATUTE BILLS: THE BILLS HAD INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN ANY EVENT

June 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to my colleague Paul Hughes for sending me a copy of the decision we are looking at today.  Another case on the ongoing saga of whether a retainer allows a solicitor to serve interim statute bills.   The…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO BEAT DEFENDANT'S PART 36 OFFER "BY A WHISKER": IS IT UNJUST FOR THE USUAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY?

CLAIMANT FAILS TO BEAT DEFENDANT’S PART 36 OFFER “BY A WHISKER”: IS IT UNJUST FOR THE USUAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY?

May 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Here we are considering a High Court decision about the consequences of a Part 36 offer.   The claimant failed to beat the offer “by a whisker” because of the way in which interest was calculated.  The judge considered the claimant’s…

CAN THE COURT ORDER A CLAIMANT TO DELIVER UP REPLIES TO PART 18 QUESTIONS BEFORE A DEFENCE IS FILED? THE ISSUE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

CAN THE COURT ORDER A CLAIMANT TO DELIVER UP REPLIES TO PART 18 QUESTIONS BEFORE A DEFENCE IS FILED? THE ISSUE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

May 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

There are relatively few cases on procedural issues relating to Part 18.   In this case the judge considered whether the court had power to compel a claimant to reply to Part 18 questions from the defendant before a defence was filed. …

YOU SPENT £1.2 MILLION ON EXPERTS AND IT WAS MAINLY MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN: DEFENDANTS ALLOWED TO RECOVER 20% OF FEES INCURRED

YOU SPENT £1.2 MILLION ON EXPERTS AND IT WAS MAINLY MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN: DEFENDANTS ALLOWED TO RECOVER 20% OF FEES INCURRED

May 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Sometimes you have to go looking for a pun as a headline for a blog post. Often they simply write themselves. In a case involving water companies who spent £1.2 million on experts,  this was one of these cases.  The…

PERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND PROVISIONAL DAMAGES 2025: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2025

PERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND PROVISIONAL DAMAGES 2025: WEBINAR 4th JUNE 2025

May 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

This webinar looks at recent cases in relation to periodical payments and periodical payments, including an interesting negligence case brought against solicitors who failed to claim provisional damages. Booking details are available here.      It then looks at the…

COST BITES 241: LEGAL OMBUDSMAN'S DECISION IN RELATION TO FAILURE TO INFORM THE CLIENT ABOUT COSTS WAS NOT IRRATIONAL: SOLICITOR PAYS £35,000

COST BITES 241: LEGAL OMBUDSMAN’S DECISION IN RELATION TO FAILURE TO INFORM THE CLIENT ABOUT COSTS WAS NOT IRRATIONAL: SOLICITOR PAYS £35,000

May 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content

The lawyer’s duty to keep the client fully informed of the costs being incurred is an important one.  This duty is highlighted in the case we are considering today. The Administrative Court upheld a finding of the Legal Ombudsman that…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 13:  INAPPROPRIATE PLEADING OF FRAUD LEADS TO COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 13: INAPPROPRIATE PLEADING OF FRAUD LEADS TO COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS

May 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

I am not sure whether there are more cases about pleadings recently, or whether I am noticing them more having started this series.  However issues relating to statements of case keep arising. Here we look at a case where the…

THE JUDGE WAS WRONG TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A "MINI TRIAL"

THE JUDGE WAS WRONG TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A “MINI TRIAL”

May 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content, Summary judgment, Witness statements

Today we are looking at a case where the claimants were successful on appeal in overturning an order granting the defendant summary judgment.  The case shows the limits of applications for summary judgment, in particular arguments that evidence was not…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 6: HOW IS THE COURT GOING TO APPROACH THE COSTS OF ACCOMMODATION WHEN THE CLAIMANT HAS A REDUCED LIFE EXPECTANCY - & HOW DOES THE COURT DEAL WITH THIS ON AN APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT?

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 6: HOW IS THE COURT GOING TO APPROACH THE COSTS OF ACCOMMODATION WHEN THE CLAIMANT HAS A REDUCED LIFE EXPECTANCY – & HOW DOES THE COURT DEAL WITH THIS ON AN APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT?

May 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Interim Payments, Members Content, Personal Injury

The decision in Swift -v- Carpenter set out the approach the courts should normally take when a claimant needs to purchase accommodation because of their injuries.  However that judgment, expressly, left open issues relating to the approach the courts should take…

INTEREST ON DAMAGES AND COSTS THAT HAVE TO BE REPAID FOLLOWING AN APPEAL: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE RATE?

May 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

Losing a case on appeal is always painful.  Having to repay the damages and costs that have been received is more painful still. Another element of pain is the fact that the losing party has to pay interest on the…

A SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE WITH A TWIST IN THE TAIL: AND WHAT A TALE THIS IS...IT LEADS TO A LOT OF WASTED COSTS (AND A POTENTIAL WASTED COSTS ORDER)

A SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE WITH A TWIST IN THE TAIL: AND WHAT A TALE THIS IS…IT LEADS TO A LOT OF WASTED COSTS (AND A POTENTIAL WASTED COSTS ORDER)

May 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment

Today we are looking at a case about a failure to serve the claim form properly. The claimant did not consider whether they knew, or had served, on the defendant’s “last known residence”.   As a result a default judgment, order…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 12: A DEFENDANT IS NOT EXPECTED TO DIVINE THE NATURE OF THE CLAIMANT'S CASE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 12: A DEFENDANT IS NOT EXPECTED TO DIVINE THE NATURE OF THE CLAIMANT’S CASE

May 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Today we are looking at a pleadings issue that arose in the course a lengthy contractual dispute.  The claimant made certain, specific allegations, and pleaded that these matters breached a large number of contractual obligations.  However, at trial, the claimant…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 5: THE PUBLICAN WAS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OF A SEPARATE SECURITY COMPANY

May 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury

When a claimant is injured by  doormen working on licensed premises is the publican vicariously liable if the assailants were employed by a separate security company ? The answer is “it depends”. The issue is primarily one of control. It…

PART 36 IN THE COURTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WEBINAR 3rd JUNE 2025: KINGS CHAMBERS

May 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36, Webinar

There is always a batch of interesting cases on Part 36, for the past four years I have reviewed this in a webinar arranged by my chambers. This year is no different and the webinar takes place on the 3rd…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 11: THE COURT WON'T STRIKE OUT PARTS OF THE DEFENCE BECAUSE... ITS ACTUALLY THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM THAT DON'T MAKE MUCH SENSE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 11: THE COURT WON’T STRIKE OUT PARTS OF THE DEFENCE BECAUSE… ITS ACTUALLY THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM THAT DON’T MAKE MUCH SENSE

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

Here we are looking at a judgment that is all about statements of case (or at least the part of the judgment we are looking at).  The claimants applied to strike out large parts of the defendant’s defence.  The judge…

EXPERTS IN COURT: "TRESPASSING ON THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION" AND "SEEKING TO ADVOCATE" ON BEHALF OF PARTY: THIS RARELY ENDS WELL...

EXPERTS IN COURT: “TRESPASSING ON THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION” AND “SEEKING TO ADVOCATE” ON BEHALF OF PARTY: THIS RARELY ENDS WELL…

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

There is no shortage of posts on this blogs where judges are critical of expert witnesses. Today we look at another such case where the judge found the expert’s approach “concerning” and went on to state that the expert was…

SERVICE OF INJUNCTIONS: THE COURT ALLOWS SERVICE BY EMAIL RATHER THAN PERSONAL SERVICE

SERVICE OF INJUNCTIONS: THE COURT ALLOWS SERVICE BY EMAIL RATHER THAN PERSONAL SERVICE

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Serving documents

Injunctions normally have to be served in person.  Here we are looking at a short point as to when it is permissible to serve an injunction by email.     THE CASE  Chanel Ltd v Skeens [2025] EWHC 619 (KB)…

THE WITNESS STATEMENT "IS IN LARGE PART UNRELIABLE AND ALSO LACKS CREDIBILITY": THE ENDURING PROBLEM OF "RETROSPECTIVE RECONSTRUCTION"

THE WITNESS STATEMENT “IS IN LARGE PART UNRELIABLE AND ALSO LACKS CREDIBILITY”: THE ENDURING PROBLEM OF “RETROSPECTIVE RECONSTRUCTION”

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked many times at the problems caused by witness statements, including when a witness “tries” to remember matters they really cannot, or reconstructs what they feel did happen (or should have happened). This is a feature of all…

PROVING THINGS 261: PROVING FUTURE INTENTIONS: AN INTENTION TO HAVE MEDICAL OPERATIONS CARRIED OUT PRIVATELY

PROVING THINGS 261: PROVING FUTURE INTENTIONS: AN INTENTION TO HAVE MEDICAL OPERATIONS CARRIED OUT PRIVATELY

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

Today we are looking at a case where the defendant appealed against a decision that the claimant could recover the future cost of medical treatment to be carried out on a private basis.  Statute states that there is no duty…

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)

May 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content

Today we are taking a rare trip into the criminal courts, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. However we are looking at an issue that affects most, if not all, lawyers.  A client can attempt to blame their lawyer for…

COST BITES 240:  THERE IS NOT A "CATCH 22" POSITION IN RELATION TO THE DRAFTING OF THESE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS

COST BITES 240: THERE IS NOT A “CATCH 22” POSITION IN RELATION TO THE DRAFTING OF THESE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS

May 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

We are continuing to work through the results of one case in relation to the recoverability of success fees from a client’s damages.  The claimants, seeking to challenge their former solicitors deduction of costs from their damages, argued that the…

COST BITES 239: HOW MUCH NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED TO A CLIENT ENTERING INTO A CFA?

COST BITES 239: HOW MUCH NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED TO A CLIENT ENTERING INTO A CFA?

May 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Members Content

We will, for the next few posts in this series, be working our way through one case. We have already looked at the judge’s observations in relation to the claimants’ witness statements.  We now consider the issue of how much…

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025

May 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury, Professional negligence,

“We go back through your claim in fine detail and if we find that your previous solicitor wasn’t thorough enough and your claim was mishandled, we’ll squeeze out all the compensation that you’re entitled to, getting you more money, and…

1 2 … 123 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR’S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL
  • SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME
  • BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER
  • SAD NEWS: THE DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE BRANCHFLOWER

Top Posts & Pages

  • BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE - MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER
  • Pricing
  • SAD NEWS: THE DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE BRANCHFLOWER
  • CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 4: THE COURT'S REVIEW OF CASES WHERE AI HAD CAUSED TROUBLE - AT HOME AND ABROAD
  • SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...