PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB

This series may well be misnamed. A more apt description may well be "not proving things".  That is what we are considering in looking at the case today.  There was a lengthy trial with a substantial claim for damages. The judge observed however, that in relation to many of the items of special dama...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below