Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2025 » June » 06
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT...

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT…

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We are returning to (and not for the last time) to the Divisional Court judgment in relation to the citation of false authorities due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. The Court reviews the dangers, the guidance and the sanctions…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content

We are continuing with the examination of the Court’s judgment in relation to cases where false authorities have been cited as a result of a reliance on false authorities, generated by artificial intelligence.   Here we have a case where the…

CITING "FALSE" CASES TO THE COURT 1:  JUDGMENT  ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE

CITING “FALSE” CASES TO THE COURT 1: JUDGMENT ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content

This blog has already considered the case of Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1040 (Admin) on several occasions. False (presumably AI generated) authorities were put before the court.  That case,…

"THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE TRIAL IS NOT A REHEARSAL": THE DIFFICULTIES A CLAIMANT HAS IN A CLAIM UNDER THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010

“THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE TRIAL IS NOT A REHEARSAL”: THE DIFFICULTIES A CLAIMANT HAS IN A CLAIM UNDER THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a case where the claimant suggested that a preliminary issue trial be adjourned.  The court was firm in its rejection of that suggestion.  The judge stated that the trial “is not a rehearsal” and that if…

PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB

PROVING THINGS 262: CLAIMANTS DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO PROVE THE DAMAGES SOUGHT: AN EXHAUSTING JOB

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

This series may well be misnamed. A more apt description may well be “not proving things”.  That is what we are considering in looking at the case today.  There was a lengthy trial with a substantial claim for damages. The…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS "NOT PURSUED"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought.  Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • YOU CAN’T SIMPLY WITHDRAW AN APPEAL WITHOUT PERMISSION: APPELLANT SEEKS TO WITHDRAW APPEAL & DOESN’T ATTEND – BUT THE APPEAL GOES AHEAD AND THE APPELLANT WINS …
  • PROVING THINGS 305 : DEFENDANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH ANY BREACHES AND (IN ANY EVENT) HAD MADE A PROFIT HERE NOT A LOSS: IF YOU PLEAD DAMAGES YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO PROVE THEM
  • SERVICE POINTS 59: AN APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM DID NOT EXTEND TIME FOR THE CLAIM FORM: NEITHER DID THE ACTUAL STRIKING OUT OF THE ACTION…
  • THERE HAS NOT BEEN FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE: THE DIFFICULTIES WHEN LITIGATION SPANS SEVERAL JURISDICTIONS: “THE SUPPOSED EXPLANATIONS BELATEDLY OFFERED … AMOUNT TO LITTLE MORE THAN AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FAILING WITH A RATHER LAME CONFESSION OF INABILITY TO EXPLAIN HOW OR WHY IT OCCURRED”
  • MI5: CONTEMPT OF COURT AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXTERNAL REPORTS: THEY ARE ADMISSIBLE BUT CANNOT BE USED TO PROVE ANYTHING: A POINT OF GENERAL RELEVANCE NOT JUST SECRET AGENTS…

Top Posts

WRITING LETTERS TO THE JUDGE AFTER A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS CIRCULATED: "THIS IS ABOUT AS FAR AWAY FROM THE CONDUCT OF SOLICITORS CONDUCTING LITIGATION AS IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET"
FORM N1 HAS BEEN SLIGHTLY AMENDED: THIS COULD BE A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY: PUTTING THE DEFENDANT'S EMAIL ADDRESS ON THE CLAIM FORM DOES NOT CHANGE THE RULES FOR SERVICE...
PROVING THINGS 304 : FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY ESTABLISHED IN A £7 MILLION CLAIM: "THE WASTE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES CAUSED BY THE CLAIMANT'S DISHONESTY IS SCANDALOUS"
YOU CAN'T SIMPLY WITHDRAW AN APPEAL WITHOUT PERMISSION: APPELLANT SEEKS TO WITHDRAW APPEAL & DOESN'T ATTEND - BUT THE APPEAL GOES AHEAD AND THE APPELLANT WINS ...
THE POWER TO GRANT AN INJUNCTION NORMALLY REQUIRES A CAUSE OF ACTION: (ONE OF) THE DIFFICULTIES OF AN ANONYMOUS LITIGANT

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.