THROWBACK FRIDAY: "I WROTE LOTS OF UNEDIFYING, AGGRESSIVE AND UNCOOPERATIVE LETTERS: LOOK WHERE IT GOT ME" (MAY 2016)

We are going back to 2016 to look at a post about a case where the judge had  noted that “both sides engaged in an aggressive and uncooperative correspondence that served only to heighten their mutual suspicion to newly raised…

EXPERT WATCH 45: THE JUDGE PREFERS THE EXPERT WHO HAD KNOWLEDGE AND "GENUINE EXPERIENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA"

We looked earlier this month at a case where the judge preferred the evidence of an expert who had “real world” experience of the matters in issue.  There are similar themes in the judgment here.  (We have looked at the…

ACTION STRUCK OUT UNDER CPR 3.4(2)(c) FOR NON COMPLIANCE: DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLIED

Here we have a reminder that failure to comply with rules and orders have consequences. In this case the consequences were that the Part 20 claimants’ action for damages was struck out.    There had been a series of failures…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 67 : YOU CANNOT RELY ON THE DEFENDANTS' ALLEGED SILENCE AS AN EXCUSE TO ATTEMPT AN UNPLEADED CASE THROUGH THE BACK DOOR

Here we have an unusual argument from the claimants.  The judge, whilst issuing a warning that the claimants had to refer back to their pleaded case, allowed the claimants some latitude in cross-examination. This led the claimants to argue that…