CLAIMANT DID NOT RECEIVE PART 36 BENEFITS WHEN IT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER BY SEVEN PENCE:  A REQUEST TO CAPITULATE IS NOT A GENUINE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT

CLAIMANT DID NOT RECEIVE PART 36 BENEFITS WHEN IT BEAT ITS OWN OFFER BY SEVEN PENCE: A REQUEST TO CAPITULATE IS NOT A GENUINE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT

I am grateful to barrister James Miller for sending me a copy of the judgment of District Judge Griffith in Gohil -v-Advantage Insurance Company (County Court at Birmingham, 11th May 2023) a copy of which is available here. Gohil v…

PART 36: NORMAL COSTS PROVISIONS DISAPPLIED WHEN A CHILD ACCEPTED A PART 36 OFFER LATE:

PART 36: NORMAL COSTS PROVISIONS DISAPPLIED WHEN A CHILD ACCEPTED A PART 36 OFFER LATE:

Yesterday I gave a webinar on recent developments in Part 36*. Almost inevitably a new case was reported as soon as the webinar finished. Further that case addresses, directly, some of the interesting questions that arose in the webinar.  In…