A CLAIMANT’S PART 36 OFFER THAT GAVE A 9% DISCOUNT WAS “SOBER AND REALISTIC”: IT WAS NOT UNJUST FOR THE DEFENDANT TO FACE THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO BEAT IT

Here we have another case where the court considered an argument that it was "unjust" for an unsuccessful defendant to face the normal Part 36 consequences when they had failed to beat a claimant's Part 36 offer.  This judgment shows how difficult an argument this is to sustain, with the burden bein...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below