COST BITES 449: HAD A CLAIMANT BEATEN ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER? IT IT HAD WAS IT UNJUST FOR THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY? MINING THE RULES FOR AN ANSWER…

Here was have a complex case where the claimant made a complex Part 36 offer.  The judge had to consider whether the claimant had considered it was effective. If it was effective was it "unjust for the normal consequences to apply? "Whilst therefore I am satisfied that the Part 36 Offer included an ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below