TRYING TO LODGE ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS SIX WEEKS AFTER THE HEARING: SUPREME COURT SAYS NO
There is a short footnote to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Tindall and another (Appellants) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Respondent) [2024] UKSC 33. It contains a warning to all of those advocates (that is probably…
The Supreme Court decision in Oakwood -v- Menzies: Deducting costs from damages:The practical implications for solicitors and clients: Webinar 13th November 2024
In Oakwood Solicitors Ltd (Respondent) v Menzies (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 34 the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal decision that the sending out an account and deducting costs from damages meant a bill had been “paid” for the purpose…
COST BITES 187: SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN MENZIES -v- OAKWOOD: THE BILL CAN GO FORWARD FOR ASSESSMENT
In the judgment today in Oakwood Solicitors Ltd (Respondent) v Menzies (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 34 the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal decision. The upshot of this is that there will now be an assessment of the solicitor/own client…
You must be logged in to post a comment.