Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2024 » December » 31
COST BITES 204: A SUCCESS FEE CANNOT BE RECOVERED AS DAMAGES: SUPREME COURT DECISION: "AN ORDER THAT PROVIDES FOR ONE PARTY TO PAY ANOTHER PARTY'S COSTS IS A COSTS ORDER"

COST BITES 204: A SUCCESS FEE CANNOT BE RECOVERED AS DAMAGES: SUPREME COURT DECISION: “AN ORDER THAT PROVIDES FOR ONE PARTY TO PAY ANOTHER PARTY’S COSTS IS A COSTS ORDER”

December 31, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Success Fees, Webinar

In Hirachand v Hirachand & Anor [2024] UKSC 43 the Supreme Court dismissed the idea that an award to a claimant could be increased to take account of the fact that the claimant was liable to pay a success fee…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • ONLINE POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS: A NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION, COURT COMMUNICATIONS AND SOME IMPORTANT DEADLINES: CAME INTO FORCE ON THE 29th SEPTEMBER…
  • MILLIONS OF DOCUMENTS, 27 FACTUAL WITNESSES AND THE ASSESSMENT OF CREDIBILITY: WITNESS EVIDENCE IN THE MANCHESTER CITY PROCEEDINGS
  • CARE CLAIMS IN PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION: WEBINAR 8th OCTOBER 2026
  • COST BITES 458 : SHOULD A COURT ORDER A THIRD PARTY TO PAY THE COSTS? CAN (OR SHOULD) AN ORDER BE MADE FOR PAYMENT BY BITCOIN? THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS ITS DOUBTS…
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN DOES THE ABSENCE OF DOCUMENTS JUSTIFY AN ADVERSE INFERENCE ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT? IS THE WITNESS EVIDENCE DEFINITIVE?

Top Posts

CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2026: HOUSING LAWYERS BE AWARE...
SUPREME COURT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDED: REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS, BUNDLES, COURT DRESS AND DRAFT ORDERS: WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE
WHEN POSSIBLE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT EMERGES - CAN A SOLICITOR SIMPLY CARRY ON AS BEFORE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: DOCUMENTS ARE ADMISSIBLE WHEN THEY ARE IN AN AGREED TRIAL OR APPLICATION BUNDLE BUT...
EXPERT WATCH 73: AN "AD HOMINEM ATTACK" ON A PARTY'S EXPERT FAILS TO IMPRESS THE JUDGE

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.