Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2024.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 35K other subscribers
Recent Posts
- SENIOR MASTER COOK’S GUIDANCE ON COST MANAGEMENT HEARINGS: A PIECE BY PIECE GUIDE (1): THE GENERAL APPROACH AND HOURLY RATES
- ANOTHER LATE CLAIM FORM CASE: COURT HAD NO POWER TO EXTEND TIME: IF IT DID THEN THE CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION WOULD HAVE BEEN REFUSED IN ANY EVENT
- COST BITES 184: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION THAT COUNSEL ON DIRECT ACCESS NOT ENTITLED TO RECOVER FEES FROM THEIR (FORMER) CLIENT BECAUSE THE CONTRACTUAL TERMS WERE UNFAIR
- FATAL CLAIMS AND THE VICTIMS OF CRIME: WEBINAR 15th OCTOBER 2024
- FISH FILES, LITIGATORS AND LITIGATION: GET BY WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM YOUR FRIENDS…
Top Posts & Pages
- SENIOR MASTER COOK'S GUIDANCE ON COST MANAGEMENT HEARINGS: A PIECE BY PIECE GUIDE (1): THE GENERAL APPROACH AND HOURLY RATES
- ANOTHER LATE CLAIM FORM CASE: COURT HAD NO POWER TO EXTEND TIME: IF IT DID THEN THE CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION WOULD HAVE BEEN REFUSED IN ANY EVENT
- STRIKING OUT AMENDED PLEADINGS, EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND THE ISSUE OF THE "IMPLIED SANCTION": COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
- CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF INFLATION WHEN LOOKING AT THE JUDICIAL COLLEGE GUIDELINES: A CASE TO POINT
- COST BITES 184: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION THAT COUNSEL ON DIRECT ACCESS NOT ENTITLED TO RECOVER FEES FROM THEIR (FORMER) CLIENT BECAUSE THE CONTRACTUAL TERMS WERE UNFAIR
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Archives
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy