EXPERTS NOT REALLY NECESSARY WHEN A JUDGE LOOKS AT BALLET SHOES: EVIDENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE EN POINTE

Instructing experts in circumstances where they are not necessary, or their evidence is not admissible, is a common theme in litigation.  This issue was considered by Mr David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Rothy's Inc v Giesswein Walkwaren AG [2020] EWHC 3391 (IPEC.

"I do not cons...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below