FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY IN PURSUING A LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIM: "IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CASE FOR THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER PSYCHIC POWERS EXIST"

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY IN PURSUING A LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIM: “IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CASE FOR THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER PSYCHIC POWERS EXIST”

April 20, 2021 · by · in Civil evidence, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to barrister Brian McCluggage for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Backhouse in Amdur -v- Krylov (13/04/21) a copy of which is available here  E14YJ570 Amdur v Krylov final 13.4.21 (1).    The judge…