One Response
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 35.2K other subscribers
Recent Posts
- WHEN A WITNESS COULD NOT SPEAK ENGLISH: A STATEMENT PREPARED SO BADLY THAT AN ADJOURNMENT WAS NECESSARY
- WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN PEOPLE ARE GIVING EVIDENCE OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED 12 1/2 YEARS PREVIOUSLY (AND SOME OF THEM WERE CHILDREN)
- AI USED IN THE WRITING OF A JUDICIAL DECISION: READ ALL ABOUT IT…
- ISSUING AN INJUNCTION MEANS “PROCEEDINGS” ARE UNDERWAY AND THE CLAIMANT HAS TO PAY THE COSTS AFTER IT WAS SET ASIDE: ALLOWING THE CLAIMANT’S ARGUMENTS IN THIS APPEAL WOULD BE AN “AFFRONT TO COMMONSENSE”
- UPDATED VERSION OF THE CHANCERY GUIDE: A USEFUL LINK
Top Posts
- THE PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MAZUR CONSIDERED: HOW NOT TO BREAK THE CRIMINAL LAW BY USING NON-QUALIFIED STAFF... WEBINAR 3rd OCTOBER 2025
- AI USED IN THE WRITING OF A JUDICIAL DECISION: READ ALL ABOUT IT...
- UPDATED VERSION OF THE CHANCERY GUIDE: A USEFUL LINK
- WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN PEOPLE ARE GIVING EVIDENCE OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED 12 1/2 YEARS PREVIOUSLY (AND SOME OF THEM WERE CHILDREN)
- ISSUING AN INJUNCTION MEANS "PROCEEDINGS" ARE UNDERWAY AND THE CLAIMANT HAS TO PAY THE COSTS AFTER IT WAS SET ASIDE: ALLOWING THE CLAIMANT'S ARGUMENTS IN THIS APPEAL WOULD BE AN "AFFRONT TO COMMONSENSE"
Archives
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
I think it was Lord Diplock in Edwards v Yorke Motors [1982] 1 WLR 444, [1982] 1 All ER 1024
“The appellant’s case runs to no less than 39 1/2 single spaced foolscap pages of detailed argument involving very long citations from judgments of the two cases relied on as key cases, and references to more than a score of other English authorities none of which was of more than peripheral relevance”