2022 IN REVIEW (IV): CASE OF THE YEAR: PART 36 OFFERS AND MISTAKES

Choosing a case of the year is never easy.  There are many significant judgments throughout a year all of which have an impact on civil procedure. However this year I am returning to a decision in January. The decision of…

WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?

WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS’ PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?

We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Hildyard in Grant & Ors v FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3366 (Ch). Having determined that a valid and effective Part 36 offer had been made by…

2022 IN REVIEW (III): OPENING LINES OF JUDGMENTS 2022: AT HOME AND ABROAD: PADDINGTON, CARNIVALS, RAISING COMMONWEALTHS AND RUINING KINGS

Our annual review continues with the best “opening lines of judgments” for 2022.  This year there are a number of strong international contenders. Worries about misguided endeavours The Serious Fraud Office & Anor v Litigation Capital Ltd [2022] EWHC 3053…

2022: IN REVIEW (II): THE QUIRKIER STUFF

Some stranger statistics from the blog this year. Looking at the busiest times, the busiest day, referrers and the countries that visit most (and least).   BUSIEST DAY AND TIME The busiest day is Tuesday. The busiest time is 11.00…

PART 36 APPLIED TO COMPLEX OFFER: PART 36 WAS ENGAGED AND THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWED

PART 36 APPLIED TO COMPLEX OFFER: PART 36 WAS ENGAGED AND THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWED

In  Grant & Ors v FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3366 (Ch) Mr Justice Hildyard considered whether Part 36 applied to a complex offer made by the applicants.  This post looks at the judgment relating to…

2022 IN REVIEW (1) : SOME FACTS AND FIGURES

2022 IN REVIEW (1) : SOME FACTS AND FIGURES

2022 has been another busy year on this blog. It is always interesting to see what people have been reading.  The most recent posts are not always the most read.  Instead posts on basic issues, from earlier years, dominate the…

ANOTHER POTENTIAL BREACH OF AN EMBARGO ON A JUDGMENT: JUDGE DECIDES TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION TO INVESTIGATE

ANOTHER POTENTIAL BREACH OF AN EMBARGO ON A JUDGMENT: JUDGE DECIDES TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION TO INVESTIGATE

The judgment in  Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 3343 (KB) shows a variation on the risks of disclosing the contents of an embargoed judgment.  The claimant did not disclose the full judgment but various messages on social media could be…

AN ACTION ISSUED ON BEHALF OF AN ESTATE BY SOMEONE WITHOUT AUTHORITY AT THE TIME OF ISSUE IS "A DEAD THING INTO WHICH NO LIFE COULD BE INFUSED"

AN ACTION ISSUED ON BEHALF OF AN ESTATE BY SOMEONE WITHOUT AUTHORITY AT THE TIME OF ISSUE IS “A DEAD THING INTO WHICH NO LIFE COULD BE INFUSED”

One search term that regularly leads people to this site is “can I issue on behalf of an estate when I don’t have letters of administration”.  There are variations on this, but the central theme is always the same.   The…

COST BITES 40: NO ONE GETS THE COSTS OF AN AMENDMENT (WHICH WERE FAR TOO HIGH ANYWAY)

COST BITES 40: NO ONE GETS THE COSTS OF AN AMENDMENT (WHICH WERE FAR TOO HIGH ANYWAY)

In Walter Hugh Merricks CBE v Mastercard Incorporated and Others [2022] CAT 52 the Competition Appeal Tribunal considered the principles relating to the costs of amendments to statements of case after a contested hearing. On the facts of this case…

IF YOU DON'T COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS YOUR CASE CAN (AND THIS CASE DID) GO DOWN THE DRAIN

IF YOU DON’T COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS YOUR CASE CAN (AND THIS CASE DID) GO DOWN THE DRAIN

In Brendon International Ltd v Water Plus Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3321 (Ch)HHJ Cadwallader (sitting as a High Court Judge) found that numerous elements of the defendant’s witness statements were defective and non-compliant with the rules.  The case is…

DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE, AND FOR A FOUR YEAR STAY, REFUSED: JUSTICE IS ACHIEVED BY THE TRIAL DATE BEING MET

DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE, AND FOR A FOUR YEAR STAY, REFUSED: JUSTICE IS ACHIEVED BY THE TRIAL DATE BEING MET

In Benford (A Child) v East And North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (Rev1) [2022] EWHC 3263 (KB) Mr Justice Ritchie refused the defendant’s application for an adjournment of a trial date. The defendant argued that medical uncertainty meant that it was…

PROVING THINGS 244 (& COST BITES 39): WHY COSTS LAWYERS HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT PROVING THINGS

We are returning to the decision on Mr Justice Cavanagh in Shepherd & Co Solicitors v Brealey [2022] EWHC 3229 (KB) to consider another aspect of the rules relating to costs.  The solicitors were seeking to persuade the court to…

A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION FOR A SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY: HIGH COURT JUDGMENT TODAY

A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION FOR A SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY: HIGH COURT JUDGMENT TODAY

In Shepherd & Co Solicitors v Brealey [2022] EWHC 3229 (KB) Mr Justice Cavanagh made some observations on the practice of making submissions once a judgment is sent out in draft.  This was not an invitation to the parties to…

ANOTHER QOCS AND PART 36 CASE: COURT MAKING ORDER UNDER PART 36 DID NOT LEAD TO QOCS PROTECTION BEING OUSTED

ANOTHER QOCS AND PART 36 CASE: COURT MAKING ORDER UNDER PART 36 DID NOT LEAD TO QOCS PROTECTION BEING OUSTED

In University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust -v- Harrison [2022] EWCA Civ 1660 *  the Court of Appeal rejected the defendant’s argument that QOCS protection was lost when the court was called upon to make an order…

SHOULD AN ISSUE IN THE REPLY BE IN THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM? A WORKING EXAMPLE

SHOULD AN ISSUE IN THE REPLY BE IN THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM? A WORKING EXAMPLE

In Griffiths & Anor v Gilbert [2022] EWHC 3122 (TCC) HHJ Sarah Watson considered a pleading issue.  Should a point made in a Reply have been pleaded in the Particulars of Claim.  She held that, on the facts of that…

QOCS PROTECTION APPLIED TO THE PERIOD BEFORE THE CLAIM WAS AMENDED TO PLEAD A CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURY: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

QOCS PROTECTION APPLIED TO THE PERIOD BEFORE THE CLAIM WAS AMENDED TO PLEAD A CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURY: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

In Pathan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2022] EWHC 3244 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne held that an action could not become subject to QOCS part way through. If the claim was a personal injury claim at trial then…

IF YOU DON'T SAY WHO YOU ARE THEN YOU CANNOT ARGUE POINTS AT A DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

IF YOU DON’T SAY WHO YOU ARE THEN YOU CANNOT ARGUE POINTS AT A DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

In Wright v Person Or Persons Unknown Responsible for the Operation and Publication of the Website bitcoin.org [2022] EWHC 2982 (SCCO) Costs Judge Rowley held that if a paying party wanted to take part in a detailed assessment of costs…

WHEN THE WORDING OF THE CLAIM FORM COMES UNDER CLOSE SCRUTINY: SOMETHING TO REMEMBER

WHEN THE WORDING OF THE CLAIM FORM COMES UNDER CLOSE SCRUTINY: SOMETHING TO REMEMBER

The precise wording of the claim form came under close scrutiny in the judgment of Mr Justice Trower in Honda Group-UK Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd & Ors v Mercer Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3197 (Ch).  It is one of…

CLAIMANT'S LATE ACCEPTANCE OF A PART 36 OFFER DID NOT PERMIT DEFENDANT TO SET OFFCOSTS AGAINST DAMAGES: QOCS PRINCIPLES REIGN SUPREME

CLAIMANT’S LATE ACCEPTANCE OF A PART 36 OFFER DID NOT PERMIT DEFENDANT TO SET OFFCOSTS AGAINST DAMAGES: QOCS PRINCIPLES REIGN SUPREME

In  Chappell v Mrozek [2022] EWHC 3147 (KB) Master Stevens rejected the defendant’s argument that the claimant’s entitlement to costs, arising from late acceptance of a Part 36 offer,  could be enforced from the claimant’s damages.  The judgment examines the…

TIME FOR CHALLENGING SOLICITOR'S BILL HAD NOT PASSED: CLAIMANT'S APPEAL ALLOWED AND ASSESSMENT TO PROCEED

TIME FOR CHALLENGING SOLICITOR’S BILL HAD NOT PASSED: CLAIMANT’S APPEAL ALLOWED AND ASSESSMENT TO PROCEED

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL SEE Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 844 In  Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors Ltd [2022] EWHC 3199 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne allowed an appeal on the…