One Response
Comments are closed.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 35.2K other subscribers
Recent Posts
- SHOULD A CLAIMANT BE GIVEN PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THEIR OWN PART 36 OFFER? IS A “CHANGE OF MIND” A “CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES”: THE ISSUE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
- MAZUR MATTERS 25: WHAT DIFFERENCE WILL MAZUR MAKE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS?(2) : HOW ABOUT – “A LITTLE AND POSSIBLY QUITE A LOT”?
- OCCUPIER’S LIABILITY CASES IN THE COURTS: A PRACTICAL APPROACH: WEBINAR 29th OCTOBER 2025
- THE CLAIM FORM CASE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (2): LEAVING A CLAIM FORM OUT FOR THE DX TO COLLECT WAS NOT EFFECTIVE SERVICE
- ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL – AND ANOTHER CLAIMANT COMING TO GRIEF (1): NO “GET OUT OF JAIL FREE” CARD HERE…
Top Posts
- WHEN A SOLICITOR SIGNS THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH FOR A COMPANY: THE COURT CAN ORDER THAT THE COMPANY DELIVERS UP DETAILS OF WHICH INDIVIDUAL GAVE INFORMATION
- MAZUR MATTERS 25: WHAT DIFFERENCE WILL MAZUR MAKE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS?(2) : HOW ABOUT - "A LITTLE AND POSSIBLY QUITE A LOT"?
- COST BITES 299: PUTTING FORWARD A OVER-LARGE BILL IN NEGOTATIONS ON COSTS: SHOULD THIS LEAD TO THE BILL BEING REDUCED BY 75%?
- COST BITES 298: SHOULD THE DEFENDANT PAY ALL THE COSTS WHEN THE CLAIMANT DISCONTINUED AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS
- SHOULD THE COURT GIVE ADEFENDANT PERMISSION TO RELY ON WITNESS STATEMENT THAT WAS SENT "EARLY" BUT NOT SERVED AS A TRIAL WITNESS STATEMENT?
Archives
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
County Court. Opponent had spent some time successfully arguing that a certain document I wished to rely on should not be admitted into evidence.
Then he called his client to give evidence. Answering my first XX question, the witness began making a speech about the contents of the document I wasn’t allowed to rely on.
Me: Well Judge, as the witness has referred to that document in his answer, may it be admitted into evidence? Judge: Yes it may.
Moral: know the rules, and tell your client not to make speeches!