PROVING THINGS 243: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: THE ACCURACY OF WITNESSES & “STORY CREEP”: GIVING THE DEFENDANT A FIVE STAR REVIEW IS NOT A STRONG BASIS FOR AN ACTION IN NEGLIGENCE
The result of clinical negligence cases sometimes rest on the views of expert witnesses. Sometimes it is the evidence of witnesses with different recollections of events. On many occasions it is the two issues combined. In Deakin-Stephenson v Behar &…
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW COURT 2024: TIME LIMITS AND PROCEDURAL RIGOUR
The latest Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide is now available and can be found here. It is dated October 2014 but was published yesterday – well ahead of time. I am simply highlighting two aspects of the Guide. “…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND COMPLIANCE: CLAIMANT ORDERED TO FILE COMPLIANT WITNESS STATEMENTS: IT COULD HAVE BEEN THE SOLICITORS NECK ON THE LINE…
We are returning to the judgment of Chief Master Shuman in In IlliquidX Ltd v Altana Wealth Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 2191 (Ch). This time looking at the issues relating to witness statements. There is a detailed consideration of the rules,…
You must be logged in to post a comment.