PROVING THINGS 243: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: THE ACCURACY OF WITNESSES & “STORY CREEP”: GIVING THE DEFENDANT A FIVE STAR REVIEW IS NOT A STRONG BASIS FOR AN ACTION IN NEGLIGENCE

The result of clinical negligence cases sometimes rest on the views of expert witnesses. Sometimes it is the evidence of witnesses with different recollections of events.  On many occasions it is the two issues combined.   In Deakin-Stephenson v Behar & Anor [2024] EWHC 2338 (KB) Dexter Dias KC ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below