EXPERT’S REPORT DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES: ALL PARTIES AGREED IT WAS “FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED” AND COULD NOT BE RELIED UPON: JUDGE STATES THAT EXPERT SHOULD CONSIDER REPAYING THE FEE

Here we are looking a  judgment given last week where all the parties involved in a case agreed that an expert's report was "fundamentally flawed".  Part of the report was based on a rejection of findings of fact that had already been made by a trial judge.  Every party to the matter agreed that ano...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below