EXPERT WATCH 13: “IT SUGGESTS THE WITNESS WAS SEEKING TO BUILD A CASE FOR THE CLAIMANTS RATHER THAN INDEPENDENTLY ANALYSE THE EVIDENCE IN REACHING HIS OPINION”: THE JUDGE FINDS THIS TROUBLING

Here we are looking a judicial observations about the role of forensic reconstruction experts.  There are telling comments on the reasons the judge preferred one expert over another. Again it comes down to a simple failure to consider  and apply the provisions of PD 35.

(PD 35 appears to be left ha...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below