EXPERT WATCH 69: “THE APPROACH OF BOTH EXPERTS IS WRONG” : WHEN THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN VALUATION OF $170 MILLION… THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO SIMPLY PICK A SIDE..

In this case the judge was categoric in his view that the approach of the experts from both sides was wrong.  There was a major difference between the experts - just under $170 million.  In these circumstances the judge is not simply bound to follow one expert or the other.  The judge here adopted a...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below