Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Copyright
  • Advertising Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » 2014 » January » 26

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND PROVING LOSS OF EARNINGS

January 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Witness statements

The previous post dealt with the importance of witness statements in proving heads of loss.   An example was given of a failure to prove loss of earnings through inadequate evidence. LOSS OF EARNINGS ON MY OTHER BLOG I maintain…

MAKE SURE YOUR WITNESS STATEMENT PROVES YOUR CASE

January 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Damages, Striking out, Witness statements

 The genesis of this article is a tweet earlier today where a solicitor reported that a claim for the cost of hire and storage had been struck out because the witness statement was deficient. “C entire hire, storage & recovery…

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2022. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 26,205 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • PAYING PARTY REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON LATE POINTS OF DISPUTE IN ASSESSMENT: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL
  • JUDGE REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION ON THE BASIS OF “ILLEGALITY”: THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT CAPABLE OF COMMITTING “CRIMINAL” ACTS
  • THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010 AND THE DATE OF “ACTIONABLE DAMAGE”: COURT REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT THE CLAIMANT’S CASE
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THE WITNESS CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH: “IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HE IN FACT SIGNED THE STATEMENT”
  • PROVING THINGS 233: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AFTER 14 YEARS: THE CRUEL CONCEPT OF CAUSATION IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

Top Posts & Pages

  • WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THE WITNESS CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH: "IT IS DOUBTFUL THAT HE IN FACT SIGNED THE STATEMENT"
  • JUDGE REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION ON THE BASIS OF "ILLEGALITY": THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT CAPABLE OF COMMITTING "CRIMINAL" ACTS
  • THE THIRD PARTY (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 2010 AND THE DATE OF "ACTIONABLE DAMAGE": COURT REFUSES TO STRIKE OUT THE CLAIMANT'S CASE
  • PROVING THINGS 233: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AFTER 14 YEARS: THE CRUEL CONCEPT OF CAUSATION IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
  • PAYING PARTY REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON LATE POINTS OF DISPUTE IN ASSESSMENT: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 14th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • Website of 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, Catastrophic Injury Group
  • www.Bailii.org

Archives

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2022 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by WordPress and Origin