Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2018 » January » 11
THE PROBLEM IN OBTAINING AN ORDER YOU HAVEN'T ASKED FOR:AN APPLICATION UNDER CPR 3.4 WILL NOT BE TREATED AS AN APPLICATION UNDER PART 24

THE PROBLEM IN OBTAINING AN ORDER YOU HAVEN’T ASKED FOR:AN APPLICATION UNDER CPR 3.4 WILL NOT BE TREATED AS AN APPLICATION UNDER PART 24

January 11, 2018 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Striking out, Summary judgment

The judgment of Chief Master Marsh in Saeed & Anor v Ibrahim & Ors [2018] EWHC 3 (Ch) contains several important observations in relation to making applications.  The Master refused to treat an application, ostensibly made under CPR 3.4, as an…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WHO IS A PARTY AFFECTED BY A SUMMARY JUDGMENT? THE CPR; CRYPTOCURRENCY; DELAY IN APPLYING AND THE MERITS OF THE CASE CONSIDERED IN A COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT TODAY
  • GUIDE TO FATAL ACCIDENTS 5th EDITION: PUBLISHED LATER THIS YEAR: AVAILABLE TO PRE-ORDER
  • SUPREME COURT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDED: REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS, BUNDLES, COURT DRESS AND DRAFT ORDERS: WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE
  • WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT … HOUSING LAW, COSTS AND PROCEDURE: 10 KEY POINTS AND USEFUL LINKS
  • INTERIM PAYMENTS: THE EXISTENCE OF DISPUTED DEFENCES AND COUNTERCLAIMS DID NOT PREVENT AN AWARD OF £1.4 MILLION

Top Posts

CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2026: HOUSING LAWYERS BE AWARE...
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WAIVING LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE BY MENTIONING IT IN A WITNESS STATEMENT
SUPREME COURT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDED: REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS, BUNDLES, COURT DRESS AND DRAFT ORDERS: WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE
WHEN POSSIBLE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT EMERGES - CAN A SOLICITOR SIMPLY CARRY ON AS BEFORE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
EXPERT WATCH 73: AN "AD HOMINEM ATTACK" ON A PARTY'S EXPERT FAILS TO IMPRESS THE JUDGE

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.