Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2020 » March » 18
HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

HMCTS GUIDANCE: CLOSURE OF COUNTERS IN THE QBD AND COURT OF APPEAL

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In press Notices sent out at 21.55 this evening HMCTS announced the closure of counters at the QBD and  Court of Appeal.  These are both set out in full below.   QBD “The Queen’s Bench Division is making some temporary…

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

HMCTS GUIDANCE ON TELEPHONE AND VIDEO HEARINGS DURING CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

HMCTS has published guidance HMCTS telephone and video hearings during coronavirus outbreak   THE GUIDANCE “Running our courts and tribunals is an essential public service. Audio and video technology has long played a part in the justice system and can now…

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE CORONAVIRUS: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS IN AN UNCERTAIN TIME: WEBINAR 25th MARCH 2020

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

On the 25th March 2020 at 1.00 pm I am giving a webinar on civil procedure and coronavirus, dealing with the best means of coping with procedural and other issues arising from COVID-19.  This is aimed primarily at personal injury…

KINGS CHAMBERS: NEW SITE ON THE LEGAL AND COMMERCIAL EFFECTS OF COVID-19

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Useful links

Kings Chambers have started a new site ” CORONAVIRUS: GUIDANCE FOR LAWYERS AND BUSINESSES”     THE AIM OF THE SITE The aim of the site is to draw across the whole range of expertise in chambers to help lawyers and…

COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF FACT: THE STANDARD OF PROOF FOR DISHONESTY:  ALSO DELAY OF 22 MONTHS IN GIVING JUDGMENT UNACCEPTABLE

COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDINGS OF FACT: THE STANDARD OF PROOF FOR DISHONESTY: ALSO DELAY OF 22 MONTHS IN GIVING JUDGMENT UNACCEPTABLE

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

In Bank St Petersburg PJSC & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Anor [2020] EWCA Civ 408 the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial because of doubts in relation to the trial judge’s findings of fact.  The judge had applied too high…

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: THE WHEELS OF JUSTICE SHOULD NOT GRIND TO A HALT

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE FROM THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: THE WHEELS OF JUSTICE SHOULD NOT GRIND TO A HALT

March 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

The update, issued yesterday is available here.  KEY POINTS “It is not realistic to suppose that it will be business as usual in any jurisdiction, but it is of vital importance that the administration of justice does not grind to…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • AN INSURER’S ADMISSION BINDS INSURED DEFENDANT EVEN THOUGH INDEMNITY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN: APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM THAT ADMISSION DISMISSED…
  • SERVICE POINTS 39: ISSUES OVER CORRECT SPANISH ADDRESS DID NOT RENDER SERVICE INVALID
  • COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING “MIXED” SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO…)
  • WHEN A CASE – WEEKS AWAY FROM TRIAL WAS “UNTENABLE”: HOW DID WE GET HERE?
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 71: COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT PERMISSION TO AMEND EVEN THOUGH THE CURRENT CASE WAS “UNTENABLE”: LESSONS HERE FOR EVERYONE

Top Posts

  • AN INSURER'S ADMISSION BINDS INSURED DEFENDANT EVEN THOUGH INDEMNITY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY WITHDRAWN: APPLICATION TO RESILE FROM THAT ADMISSION DISMISSED...
  • COST BITES 383: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS FOLLOWING "MIXED" SUCCESS AT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION? WHAT IS A FAIR AND REASONABLE AMOUNT? (SOMETHING ABOUT APPROPRIATE DELEGATION AND HOURLY RATES TOO...)
  • SERVICE POINTS 39: ISSUES OVER CORRECT SPANISH ADDRESS DID NOT RENDER SERVICE INVALID
  • WHEN A CASE - WEEKS AWAY FROM TRIAL WAS "UNTENABLE": HOW DID WE GET HERE?
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHAT TO WEAR TO COURT: "IF YOU ATTEND COURT DRESSED INAPPROPRIATELY, COURT STAFF MAY REFUSE YOU ENTRY"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.