Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2021 » February » 08
THE CORRECT COURT FEE WHEN ADDITIONAL PARTIES ARE JOINED INTO AN ACTION: NOT £55 BUT £10,000 (OH, AND YOU CAN'T RELY ON WHAT THE COURT TOLD YOU...)

THE CORRECT COURT FEE WHEN ADDITIONAL PARTIES ARE JOINED INTO AN ACTION: NOT £55 BUT £10,000 (OH, AND YOU CAN’T RELY ON WHAT THE COURT TOLD YOU…)

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content

There are not many cases where a judge is asked to determine what the appropriate court fee should be. However this is precisely what occurred in the judgment of HHJ Pearce in Walayat & Ors v Berkeley Solicitors Ltd [2021]…

WHEN A SOLICITOR SAYS "BURN IT" IN RELATION TO DOCUMENTS THIS GIVES RISE TO A PRIMA FACIE ISSUE OF  CONTEMPT OF COURT: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

WHEN A SOLICITOR SAYS “BURN IT” IN RELATION TO DOCUMENTS THIS GIVES RISE TO A PRIMA FACIE ISSUE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Disclosure, Members Content

In the judgment today in  Ocado Group PLC & Anr v McKeeve [2021] EWCA Civ 145 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision that  the court should not allow an application for contempt of court against a solicitor to proceed….

JUDGE REFUSES PERMISSION TO A DEFENDANT TO RELY ON A WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE: THE APPLICATION DID NOT FLY...

JUDGE REFUSES PERMISSION TO A DEFENDANT TO RELY ON A WITNESS STATEMENT SERVED LATE: THE APPLICATION DID NOT FLY…

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Manchester Airport PLC & Anor v Radisson Hotel Manchester Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3739 (Ch)  HHJ Halliwell refused a defendant’s application to serve witness evidence late. “There cannot be any reasonable justification for adjourning the trial to give the…

HOURLY RATES AND THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES

HOURLY RATES AND THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: SOME INTERESTING ISSUES

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In ABS Company Ltd v Pantaenius UK Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 3720 (Comm)  HHJ Pelling QC assessed costs at the end of a trial.  There are some interesting observations in relation to hourly rates, and the conduct of litigation…

IF A DEFENDANT IS BEING SUED FOR TOO MUCH MONEY THEN IT SHOULD USE PART 36: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN DECISION THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO ORDER FOR COSTS

IF A DEFENDANT IS BEING SUED FOR TOO MUCH MONEY THEN IT SHOULD USE PART 36: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN DECISION THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO ORDER FOR COSTS

February 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

In Global Energy Horizons Corporation v Gray [2021] EWCA Civ 123 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision that there be no order for costs. The fact that the claimant had succeeded on a fraction of its claim was not…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION AN 8 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE (AUGUST 2019): AND LOOK AT THE LINKS…
  • EXPERT WATCH 66: RED FLAGS AND EXPERTS (1) :THE DUTY TO CONSIDER THE RANGE OF OPINIONS: OFTEN “HONOURED IN THE BREACH”; OFTEN FATAL TO A PARTY’S CASE
  • EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY “WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT” TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG
  • ANOTHER INTERESTING DISCUSSION (ABOUT INTEREST…): THE STARTING POINT IS THAT THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO BE COMPENSATED FOR BEING OUT OF ITS MONEY (NO MATTER WHAT IT WOULD HAVE DONE WITH IT…)
  • WHEN A COURT MAY MAKE NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE FACTORS CONSIDERED: 12 KEY POINTS AND A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS

Top Posts

COST BITES 435: £4 MILLION SPENT IN COSTS AND NEITHER PARTY WILL RECOVER A PENNY FROM THE OTHER: A "PYRHHIC" VICTORY LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS...
COST BITES 436: THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANT'S PART 36 OFFER: WAS IT UNJUST FOR THE USUAL CONSEQUENCES TO APPLY? THE IMPORTANCE OF INTEREST
EXPERT WATCH 65 : WHEN THE JUDGES SAY "WE ATTACH VERY LITTLE WEIGHT" TO A REPORT IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG
A WIDOW CANNOT BRING AN ACTION UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT WHERE HER HUSBAND SETTLED THE PERSONAL INJURY ACTION AGAINST A CONCURRENT TORTFEASOR IN HIS LIFETIME
WHEN A COURT MAY MAKE NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE FACTORS CONSIDERED: 12 KEY POINTS AND A USEFUL CHECKLIST FOR PRACTITIONERS

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.