“UNNECESSARILY ARGUMENTATIVE OR WASTEFUL CORRESPONDENCE” NOT COUNTENANCED IN COSTS BUDGETING: “IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO”

The post earlier this morning on "intemperate" comments in court documents and correspondence reminded me that I meant to highlight a particular aspect of the  judgment in Pan NOx Emissions Litigations [2024] EWHC 1728 (KB).   The judgment highlights that unnecessarily argumentative correspondence w...