Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2024 » November » 11
COST BITES 193: HOW COSTS OF £300,000 COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED: COURT OF APPEAL OBSERVATIONS

COST BITES 193: HOW COSTS OF £300,000 COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED: COURT OF APPEAL OBSERVATIONS

November 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

The Court of Appeal judgment in Clapham & Ors v Narga [2024] EWCA Civ 1388 contains important observations about the interaction of the law of adverse possession and the Land Registration Act 2002. However, this being a blog about litigation,…

COST BITES 191: COSTS BILL REDUCED TO NIL BECAUSE OF MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT: "THIS IS THE WORSE EXAMPLE OF TAMPERING WITH A FILE OF PAPERS THAT I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED"

COST BITES 191: COSTS BILL REDUCED TO NIL BECAUSE OF MISCONDUCT ON ASSESSMENT: “THIS IS THE WORSE EXAMPLE OF TAMPERING WITH A FILE OF PAPERS THAT I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED”

November 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to Simon Gibbs of GWS Costs for sending me a copy of the judgment of Costs Judge James in Kapoor -v- Johal [2024] EWHC 2853 (SCCO).  The judge made findings of serious misconduct by the receiving party…

THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT: APPEAL ALLOWED WHEN NO REASONS GIVEN FOR REFUSING APPLICATION

THE COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT: APPEAL ALLOWED WHEN NO REASONS GIVEN FOR REFUSING APPLICATION

November 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In EB Pension Fund & Ors v Froggatt [2024] EWHC 2721 (Ch) Mr Nicholas Thompsell (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) allowed an appeal where there had been a refusal to allow an adjournment.  He held that…

ADVOCACY THE JUDGE'S VIEW 7: WITNESS STATEMENTS "ACCURACY AND NOT LEGAL ARGUMENT IS THE KEY TO ENSURING A WITNESS STATEMENT IS AS EFFECTIVE AS IT CAN BE"

ADVOCACY THE JUDGE’S VIEW 7: WITNESS STATEMENTS “ACCURACY AND NOT LEGAL ARGUMENT IS THE KEY TO ENSURING A WITNESS STATEMENT IS AS EFFECTIVE AS IT CAN BE”

November 11, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In terms of preparation of client’s case, and prospects of success,  witness statements  are crucial.  The rules only allow the witness to give additional evidence in exceptional circumstances.  Many cases that go to trial are, in essence, about the credibility…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS A JUDICIAL REVIEW DECISION IN FAVOUR OF A SOLICITOR: THE OMBUDSMAN GOT NOTHING WRONG (QUITE A LOT HERE ABOUT VULNERABLE CLIENTS AS WELL…)
  • DEEPFAKES AND THE LAWYER: SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS AND LINKS: “VERIFICATION SHOULD OCCUR BEFORE EVIDENCE IS DEPLOYED, NOT AFTER AUTHENTICITY IS CHALLENGED…”
  • “DEEPFAKE” EVIDENCE POSSIBLY COMING TO A COURT NEAR YOU SOON: LESSONS FROM AMERICA…
  • WHEN A LOCAL AUTHORITY REQUIRES RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: “IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT THE PUBLIC BODY FILES ITS PAPERS IN A TIMELY FASHION AND CO-OPERATES WITH THE CLAIMANT”
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 82: THERE MAY BE A POTENTIALLY VIABLE CLAIM HERE BUT YOU HAVEN’T PLEADED IT: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN A DECISION TO GRANT PERMISSION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM

Top Posts

DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGES SHOULD BE CAREFUL WHO IS GIVEN THE TASK OF TRYING COMPLEX TRIALS: COURT OF APPEAL MISSIVE TO DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGES (& MANY OTHERS...)
NEW COURT FEES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 13th JULY 2026: SOME BRAND NEW PROVISIONS AND THE INFLATIONARY INCREASES: THE CIVIL AND FAMILY COURTS, THE MAGISTRATES' COURT, THE LANDS CHAMBER (AND MANY OTHERS)
COST BITES 403: JUDGMENT TODAY: SUCCESS FEE AND ATE PREMIUM NOT PAYABLE BY CLIENT WHEN THE SOLICITOR FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE ENQUIRIES ABOUT BTE INSURANCE
A NEW SERIES OF USEFUL ONLINE CALCULATORS FOR LITIGATORS AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION (WITH A 20% DISCOUNT FOR CLB READERS): MAKING IT ALL ADD UP
PROVING THINGS 291: WHAT WEIGHT DOES A JUDGE GIVE TO WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THE WITNESSES DO NOT ATTEND TRIAL AND (THE JUDGE FINDS) THERE IS NO GOOD REASON FOR THIS?

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.