AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION: A LAWYER’S GUIDE 2O25: WATCH THIS SPACE…
Back in 2013 I wrote a series about avoiding negligence claims in litigation. This is an appropriate time to update and refresh that series (with the benefit of hindsight perhaps I should have done that annually). Some of the…
ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATED CASES”: PLUS THERE MAY BE “MISCHIEF” IN THE BACKGROUND
A few weeks ago I was cagey in reporting a case about AI generated false authorities because I could not believe any lawyer could do this and was wary of the accuracy (indeed authenticity) of the report. Today I am…
SUBSCRIPTION NEWS: YOUR GROUP SUBSCRIPTION INCLUDES A “PLUS ONE”
A question from a group subscriber today led me to discover that every group subscription includes a “plus one”, so the administrator of the group has access to the site in addition to the number of seats purchased. THE…
LITIGATION, INSOLVENT SOLICITORS, FUNDERS, NEGLIGENCE, INSURERS – AND THE SCOPE OF DISCLOSURE UNDER PD57AD: A LOT OF OF LITIGATION LIFE IS CONSIDERED IN THIS COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
For the second time today we are looking at a case involving the fallout following solicitors being involved in litigation and the funding thereof. It also involves companies in administration and allegations of cases being mishandled. The sums involved are…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 19: AN UNKIND OR CYNICAL READER OF THE DEFENCE “MIGHT BE TEMPTED TO CONCLUDE THAT THEIR VERY COMPLEXITY AND LENGTH WERE INTENDED TO CONCEAL THE LACK OF ESSENTIAL SUBSTANCE AT THEIR VERY HEART”
We are looking at a case where – in no short measure – the judge was highly critical of the defendant’s pleadings. They were described as “the very antithesis” of the paradigm urged upon pleaders by the guidance given in…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 18: SOLICITORS, OUTSOURCING AGREEMENTS, PLEVIN CLAIMS AND A PLEADING POINT ON A DAMAGES CLAIM: THERE IS MUCH TO CONSIDER HERE
The case we are looking at today has many levels. It involves the falling out of two entities that were involved in “mass litigation” for thousands of claimants. It shows something of the nature of this type of litigation. Arguably…
WHEN THE JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT REPORT IS OF “LITTLE OR NO” ASSISTANCE TO THE COURT: A CASE IN POINT
The courts encourages the use of jointly instructed experts However this does not mean that the case, or even key issues in the case, are necessarily determined by those experts. Here we have a case where the judge held that…
You must be logged in to post a comment.