COST BITES 256: SHOULD THE COURT MAKE A “SANDERSON” ORDER WHEN A CLAIMANT HAS SUCCEEDED AGAINST ONE DEFENDANT BUT FAILED AGAINST ANOTHER? THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

Those who take examinations in civil procedure have to studiously consider the difference between a "Bullock" order and a "Sanderson" order.  Both relate to the liability of one defendant to pay the costs of another. The principles are considered in the case we are looking at here.  The claimant had...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below