COST BITES 256: SHOULD THE COURT MAKE A "SANDERSON" ORDER WHEN A CLAIMANT HAS SUCCEEDED AGAINST ONE DEFENDANT BUT FAILED AGAINST ANOTHER? THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

COST BITES 256: SHOULD THE COURT MAKE A “SANDERSON” ORDER WHEN A CLAIMANT HAS SUCCEEDED AGAINST ONE DEFENDANT BUT FAILED AGAINST ANOTHER? THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

Those who take examinations in civil procedure have to studiously consider the difference between a “Bullock” order and a “Sanderson” order.  Both relate to the liability of one defendant to pay the costs of another. The principles are considered in…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 23: THE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GUESS THE CASE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO MEET: CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITOR STRUCK OUT

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 23: THE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GUESS THE CASE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO MEET: CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITOR STRUCK OUT

We are looking at another case where it was held that the claimant’s Particulars of Claim were pleaded in an unsatisfactory manner.  Even at the third attempt of amendment the case did not make sense and the action struck out….