THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 28: WHY THE PROPOSED AMENDED PARTICULARS DID NOT SAVE THE CLAIMANT: “MERE ASSERTION IS NOT SUFFICIENT”

We are continuing to examine the case looked at in the previous post.  The claimant, faced with an application that the amended Particulars of Claim did not comply with the requirements of a court order, or the rules, made an application for permission to file re-amended Particulars.  The judge held...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below